Slashdot Mirror


The Poincaré Conjecture has Been Proved

Martin Dunwoody, a famous mathematician who works in the field of topology has a preprint that provides a proof of the Poincaré conjecture. This was one of the seven Clay Mathematics Institute millenium prize problems (reported on Slashdot here). The solution to each of the problems carries a monetary reward of 1 million dollars. However there are a number of conditions that still need to be met for the prize to be awarded in the case of the Poincaré conjecture.

15 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. now I've seen it all by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Poincaré Conjecture proved, and microsoft ads on slashdot

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
  2. teacup == donut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    so we finally have mathematical proof that a teacup is a donut for every teacup in the known (Euclidean) universe

    1. Re:teacup == donut by Quirk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Charles Dodgson, somewhere thru the looking glass, is at tea with the Mad Hatter discussing this very matter.

      :)
      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
  3. Re:Wierd Problem by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 3, Funny

    Without reading the preprint, I cannot say (not that I could understand it anyway :) ). But it wouldn't surprise me if the proof was just for 3.

    R^3 is kind of a magical place. R^2 might not have enough wiggling room, but R^4 might have too much. There exists a cross product in only R^3.

  4. In related news.... 4 = 5 by dimator · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here's the proof:

    assume a, b, c such that: a + b = c

    then 5a + 5b = 5c
    and 4c = 4a + 4b

    adding the two: 5a + 5b + 4c = 4a + 4b + 5c

    shifting some terms around: 5a + 5b - 5c = 4a + 4b - 4c

    simplifying: 5 (a + b - c) = 4 (a + b - c)

    dividing by the common factor (a + b - c): 5 = 4

    :)

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:In related news.... 4 = 5 by Rhinobird · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh sure you can, but then winston churchill becomes a carrot...and other such nonsense.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  5. Re:The problem is... by nucal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Still, by the Poincaré Conjecture - Gumby is equivalent to Pokey.

  6. the eric conspiracy by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny


    Maybe we should give these problems to the people at the next ACM International Programming Contest.

  7. Re:proof has been announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    At the very least, the past participle form should be used, making it "The Poincaré Conjecture has Been Proven"

  8. Re:Wierd Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've discovered a truly remarkable proof myself. I just can't fit it into this HTML text box.

  9. Cows have an infinte number of legs by Jhan · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Cows have an even number of legs.
    2) Cows have forelegs and two back legs, equalling six legs.
    3) Six is an odd amount of legs for a cow.
    4) By 1 and 3 cows have both an even number of legs and an odd number of legs.
    5) The only number that is both odd and even is infinity.

    Cows have an infinite number of legs. QED.

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  10. Re:Nah by Cowculator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be careful how you phrase that last sentence - your carefree use of the word "obvious" in reference to math calls to mind an old joke:

    Two mathematicians were talking one day about some recent work they'd done. One described a proof to the other but quickly glossed over a complicated step. The second one said, "Wait a minute - you didn't prove your last assertion." The reply: "It's obvious."

    So the second mathematician wordlessly took a piece of chalk, went to the nearby blackboard, and began to fill it with long statements full of obscure symbols. Nearly half an hour later, he stopped writing, turned around, and said, "You're right. It is obvious."

  11. Re:Statement of conjecture on wolfram incorrect? by lyosha · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's the better proof that R^3 and S^3 are not homeomorphic. Here it goes:

    S^3 is compact and R^3 is not.

  12. Re:...has been "PROVEN", ...has been "PROVEN" by Anonynnous+Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fair enough. But the first one is more likely the correct one, while the second one was added as a concession to the fact that so few could get it right. It's like "data are" and "data is"--both are considered correct now, but literate people use the first.

  13. Re:...has been "PROVEN", ...has been "PROVEN" by Anonynnous+Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    D'oh!

    But the first one is more likely the correct one

    Which, I see now, is the one that had been used. Sorry.