Slashdot Mirror


Unix Isn't Dead

windows bios world writes: "Compaq, Sun, SGI, and IBM are releasing new machines running Unix. From cnet.com: 'Compaq has begun shipping test versions of a new line of AlphaServer Unix servers using the EV7 "Marvel" version of the company's Alpha processor. ... As expected, IBM released on Monday its p670, a 16-processor machine that's essentially a smaller version of Big Blue's top-end 32-processor p690 "Regatta" server introduced in late 2001.' Also, Sun teamed up with Sony to release video-on-demand servers." And of course, there's OS X.

36 of 436 comments (clear)

  1. You post at -1? by pclminion · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    What did you do to deserve such recognition?

    1. Re:You post at -1? by pclminion · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      And it just keeps happening.

      Don't you people realize I'm purposefully wasting your points? Why don't you exercise some restraint?

    2. Re:You post at -1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Thanks Ralph! I think I'll make another account now, so that I can preserve my final "karma score of 44" for posterity. Then I'll try my best to make slashdot suck as much as humanly possible (although I won't have to do much).

      Thanks for putting off an actual contributor to the site. I've been modded to 5 many times in the past, but I guess that counts for nothing, especially when I try to make an honest joke.

      You people can't realize why slashdot is such a haven of bullshit? Why don't you look toward yourselves...

  2. Re:borkbork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Yuck. For a while there, I was thinking that's the ugliest clit I've ever seen...

    Will this replace goatse.cx??

  3. Thank god by pclminion · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Thank god the moderators stepped in to mark you "troll" within 30 seconds of the article posting.

    Why don't you people grow up? Wait for the good comments, and mod them up. Why not be constructive? You're just wasting your points.

    1. Re:Thank god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Do editors moderate?
      The Slashdot Editors have unlimited mod points, and we have no problem using them. These moderations represent approximately 8% of all moderation, and according to Meta Moderation, the fairness of these comments is statistically indistinguishable from the moderation of non admin users (92-93% of moderations are ruled 'Fair'). You can argue that this is somehow inherently unfair, but one of the goals of Slashdot is to produce readable content for a variety of readers with a variety of reading habits, and this process improves discussions for the vast majority of Slashdot Readers, so it will stay this way.
      Answered by: CmdrTaco
      Last Modified: 1/24/02

    2. Re:Thank god by pclminion · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I believe I've proved my point.



      Morons.



      For christ's sake, mod me down. If you don't, the world will explode.

  4. Slashdot Poll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    What's better?

    (a) A Unix project

    or

    (b) Sex with a mare

    ?

  5. Unfortunately, Linux will soon be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ...if it's community and companies doesn't straighen up.

  6. Maria by pclminion · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Sex with a mare? Why would I want to have sex with a dark, basalt-rich region of the lunar surface?

  7. OSX 0wn3z j00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    reel hax0r3z uz3 0sX f0re hax0r1ng

  8. off topic but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    wow... just imagine having a 32 processor machine...that baby would get some keen fps in QA3 no doubt!... of course the video would max out at some point but hey at least there is claiming rights ;)

  9. Its not dead it's just resting it eyes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    lets shave UNIX's eyebrows while it sleeps...

  10. Re:Nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    mortally challenged

    So, you mean to say that it's not infact mortal, and is invincible?

  11. nice title of the article by flynt · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Unix servers breaking out all over

    Kind of like its Users huh? :)

    1. Re:nice title of the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I'll shoot you! I'll shoot all of you!

  12. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    sir, you may talk like that in the locker room at the gym or in the privacy of your own home, but slashdot is a family site and i implore you to kindly watch your language, this is not the boiler room of an ocean-going vessel, there is no need for the f word.

    thanks, ed

  13. Has Apple paid the Open Group by ahde · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    for licensing the Unix name? As nice as OS X is, I don't think it could pass the compatability tests anyway.

    Besides, I'm pretty sure the article is talking about servers. No link though.

  14. Re:Does this mean ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    No, BSD is still dying, it's just SysV that will live. :-)

  15. Re:Does this mean ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    What it means is *BSD is dying, mr.potato head. What part you don't understand?

  16. Re:Does this mean ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    you guys are fucking retarded

  17. You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    You know, the sick thing is, you've turned me into a troll! I started out posting what I BELIEVED was a funny comment on the meaning of the word "mare," and all the moderators see fit to do is mod it down.

    I never intended to troll (I tried it once, and it just wasn't satisfying, so I stopped). I was hoping for some positive mod points for making a joke.

    Like many of you other disgruntled users, I could just go away and forget about /., but now that you've demonstratred your stupidity in the most obvious way, I think I'll make it my mission to troll as much as possible!

    Thanks for the inspiration!

    (Try thinking, next time. It's great fun.)

  18. Re:bsd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hey! Like we DID NOT know that, you fucknut!? HELLO, MR. POTATO HEAD, ANYBODY HOME???

  19. Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Don't you know Editors have unlimited Mod Points? You ain't wasting shit.

  20. UNIX isn't dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It's pining for the Fjords.

    --Monty Python

  21. Re:Does this mean ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Mr. Potato Head! MR. POTATO HEAD!

    asdfgkjdfglkjaf;ldsfkælaksdfpoweiræasldkfasf
    as dfdfsdflskdfksjdfdf
    sadfsdfsdlewoksældkfS

  22. Re:Here's the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You dimwit... next time try a closing tag.

  23. How about Toast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    seriously, put your beef with Roxio aside, their Mac stuff is the best.

  24. pointless article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Summary:

    EV7 not out yet.

    Fuel has been out for a while, now.

    IBM, Sun, HP continuing business as normal.

    Slow news day.

    In other news, I will not be programming in Java today, because whatever slashdot says, it does not make you more virile. I plan to do a study, but C seems to be the studliest language.

    OTOH, I was working in PHP the day I met michelle... Well, mostly I was reading slashdot, but I was also doing a little bit of PHP.

  25. Re:who ever said it was? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Prove it.

  26. Unix isn't dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Well, duh.

  27. Re:bsd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Netcraft has officially confirmed: *BSD is dying

    Yet again a crippling bombshell has hit the already beleaguered *BSD community. IDC has now confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    *BSD is dying

  28. c'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    yes it is!

    http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/default.asp

    MUHAHAHAHAHAHHAAA!!!

  29. Re:who ever said it was? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Netcraft officially has confirmed: *BSD is dying

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered *BSD community when recently IDC confirmed that *BSD accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Cming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS hobbyist dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dead

  30. Re:Does this mean ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    It is official - Netcraft has confirmed: *BSD is dying

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when industry stalwart IDC confirmed that *BSD has dropped to less than a fraction of 1 percent of market share. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BS is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS hobbyist dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dead

  31. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    It is official; Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BS market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels f the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dead