Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Eight New Security Holes in IIS

Posted by timothy on from the nobody's-perfect dept.

TedCheshireAcad writes: "A story at the Register asserts that MS's 'Trustworthy Computing' campaign has failed once again, with eight new IIS vulnerabilities discovered. The vulnerabilities include such delights as a buffer overflow in the ASP ISAPI filter, improper HTTP header handling, FrontPage Server Extensions problems and more goodies. Both IIS 4 and 5 are vulnerable. Thanks to eEye and @Stake for their advisories here(1) and here(2)."

4 of 46 comments (clear)

  1. Ridiculous headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot:
    Eight new security holes in IIS

    Any Site with Journalistic integrity:
    Microsoft fixes Eight new security holes in IIS

    http://geek.com/news/geeknews/2002apr/gee200204110 11151.htm
    http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/04/10/ 020410hnflaws.xml

  2. trustworthy computing fails again? by mikemulvaney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems to me that the Trustworthy Computing campaign is succeeding. They found 8 new bugs, and fixed them (well, they didn't find all 8, but they did find some of them...).

    Yes, it would be better if they didn't have any bugs in the first place, and yes, it would be a lot better if they would announce the bugs before they had the patches ready, but you can't say that the months of code review failed after they actually found something.

    I would be a lot more worried if they didn't find any bugs...

    -Mike

  3. Failure, or success? by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This can be spun many ways. Could it be that Microsoft found these ten flaws thanks to their month of heavy code checking in February, and are working on fixes for them?

    I mean, why is it a failure to find flaws and fix them? If you're trying to get trustworthy computing, seems like it's a failure if you don't fix any flaws.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  4. Re:it's actually 10... by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yeah, when the announcement first came out they rejected it because it was evidence that MS is delivering on the promises they made. Now, two days later, late at night, it slipped in accidentally as an MS bashing article. Duh.

    They should be applauding MS for biting the bullet and announcing these flaws. MS could have kept them secret, you know. This sort of press will only hurt the chances of more companies being more open with their security issues.

    Shame, shame..