'Virtual' Child Porn Act Ruled Unconstitutional

wiredog writes "The United States Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, has found the Child Pornography Prevention Act to be unconstitutionally vague and far-reaching." You might read the Act. There were a number of cases challenging the constitutionality of the Act; I believe three Appeals courts eventually upheld it, and one ruled it unconstitutional, guaranteeing that the Supreme Court would take one of the challenges for review. A summary of the decision is available, and see that pages for links to the majority opinion and dissenting opinions.

Comments

Some $hit is just wrong. . .

[ebonic plague]

. . .but two wrongs don't make a right.

Re:fuckin a

[First Post Counter]

Congradulations, trollercoaster! Your first post has been officialy recognized as the true First Post

Current Statistics:

Logged in FPs: 7
AC FPs: 4

First Posters:

2 - trollercoaster
1 - morhoj
1 - Spanko
1 - teambpsi
1 - Tensor
1 - xnok