Slashdot Mirror


End Of the Road for Duron

yorgasor writes: "AMD announced that their Duron processor will no longer be produced near the end of this year. They plan on focusing all of their CPU production energy on Athlons and Hammers. The Register has more about it."

4 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. This really sucks... by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For the cash strapped, making a linux server on lower end hardware is the way to go (my server is on a P1-120MHz box). Why must they push the envelope so hard?

    The lowest end CPU you can find now-a-days is like 800Mhz, unless you go to auctions...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  2. No biggie by jht · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When processors cost $300 and up on average, having a budget processor line was important. Now that a lower-end Athlon processor (the Socket A 950) is all the way down around $70, it's more worth while for AMD to just produce Athlon series chips in the 32-bit world. Heck, the top-of-the-line processors are generally right around the $300 that used to be an average selling price!

    Fewer chip lines=more efficient production=lower costs=lower prices on balance.

    Intel's pretty much done the same thing, except they've all but killed the P3 in favor of the Celeron at the low end.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  3. Pity, I kinda like the Duron by roguerez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the other hand, AMD's pricing hardly justifies a value processor, since compared to Intel processors they are already pretty cheap.

    If they widen the XP line just a little bit by extending the slower models lifetime a little, they can fill the gap the Duron leaves behind with the XP itself.

    Also: when the Hammers arrive, the XP will fade away and presumably act as a value processor for a while. A Duron as an even cheaper CPU wouldn't make sense in such a scenario.

    Another reason I can think of, is that it doesn't make so much sense to make a CPU with a 100 MHz FSB. With today's materials this will probably not be cheaper to procuce than 133 MHz parts. So you're actually producing less than you can for the same cost, just to create a difference between models. Essentially the smaller L2 cache is the probably the only difference in cost of production between the Duron and the XP.

  4. Re:New motherboard (again) by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why??

    I bought my Dual system a while ago with a pair of P-III 800's in it.. and I just got a pair of P-III 1.2ghz's , the limit of the motherboard, for it. no problems, and 2 gig of SDRAM from my 1Gig was trivial. Geforce3 is still happily plugging away and the U160 SCSI bus still has room for another 10 drives. no problems at all upgrading over a year later..

    You gotta spend the money up front to be able to keep the upgrade path open.. a el-cheapo mobo will lock you down.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.