Slashdot Mirror


Review: Creative Labs Video Blaster - Digital VCR

An anonymous reader sent in a review of Creative's Digital VCR, a TV tuner card supposedly offering functionality similar to a Tivo or ReplayTV dedicated box. From the review, it seems like there are still a few bugs to be worked out.

"Two weeks ago, I dropped by my Local Frys Electronics to pick up the Creative Labs Video Blaster Digital VCR. I picked up the card for the lovely price of $99. I felt at the time that the days of a PVR was upon me. I hooked it up into my modest system and got started right away. My modest system includes:

  • Pentium III 1Ghz System
  • 512 MB of PC-133 SDRAM
  • 1 40 GB 7200 WD Drive, on ATA-66
  • 1 60 GB 7200 Maxtor Drive, on ATA-100
  • ATI Radeon VE
  • LG 24x CD Burner, on ATA-66
  • Running Windows XP Pro
My Maxtor Drive was a new purchase that was going to be dedicated to my Digital VCR Experience, hence my marooning the drive on my onboard HighPoint HPT370 controller card. The installation of the card was a snap, and the drivers were quick and painless.

Now, at home, I don't subscribe to any digital video services: I get pretty good reception over an old-fashioned antenna. I primarily wanted the card so I could capture my tape collection of Enterprise episodes to MPEG-2, so I could burn VCDs for my DVD player. I also wanted to begin my trek down the PVR road, and eventually do away with VHS forever.

I spent an evening a couple of days ago, playing with settings on screen-size, capture quality and file sizes. One thing I noticed quite quickly is that the Digital VCR system does not encode directly to MPEG-2. Creative sets up many segment files on your system, each in 32mb blocks, to store your recorded shows and timeshifting buffer. It is essentially a filesystem on top of a filesystem. In order to get the MPEG-2 files out of the Digital VCR, you use a 'File Converter' that they provide in the Creative Menu. The results of this setup is that when you setup the system, you specify how long you want to record (19 hours in my case) and it takes up the appropriate harddrive space (45 GB in my case) for use for future recording. The tool works pretty well overall, even going so far as to create new MPG files every 650 MB. The problem with this is that its possible that your recording could be sliced mid-sentence in your show. The other problem though, didn't occur until last night.

I recorded the episode of Enterprise last night, as well as I had some previous shows of 'Friends' in my 'Saved Shows' menu. After watching the episode again, I pulled up the file convert tool to convert Enterprise to MPG, and flipped onto Live TV, so I could watch the news. Then, the unspeakable happened. Digital VCR froze. I tried to kill it from the Task Manager (which worked perfectly well), but to no avail. There was no killing this app at all. This crash spread like a bad flu across the rest of my system and I was forced to hard reboot. Returning to Windows, I brought up the convert tool to start again, this time not to make the mistake of watching television at the same time. There was only one problem: All of the shows recorded in the last 2 days were wiped out. No data on disk, nothing.

In the end, there were very few positive points that I would give to the Digital VCR product: it just doesn't seem ready for primetime. All in all, the issues I found were as follows:

  • Jerky on startup
  • Processor Intensive during playing (I'd recommend at least a 1.5 Ghz)
  • Menu System is slow
  • No Linux Drivers
  • Instability in proprietary filesystem
  • Mpeg Splitting (what about 700mb CDRs or DVDS)
In the end, I'd give this product a 2.5 out of a possible 5 score. The unit has a lot of potential, but it seems far from it. Dedicated PVR equipment seems a much better choice, even if pricey."

9 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. 2.5 by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    This reminds me of a homeless guy on local radio who rates movies.

    He'll rail on a movie, go on about how it sucks and then give it 50 stars (out of 5)

    This thing doesn't even really work and it gets 2.5 out of 5? Sounds like 2.5 out of 10 may have been more appropriate.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:2.5 by Schnapple · · Score: 3, Funny
      "I give it my lowest rating ever! Seven thumbs up!"
      --Homer Simpson
  2. Re:Doesnt the ATI AIW do this? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Funny

    No kidding. I have had had a 50 quadrillion terrabyte TiVo server in the bat cave for like 25 years.

    The coolest was looping that scene in Brady Bunch where they looped the scene of that girl getting hit in the face with the football.

    Alfred was in stitches for weeks.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  3. Re:TV watch or surf? by MisterBlister · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where can I buy DVD movies about surfing the net? They sound interesting. I'd like to buy them online, got any links?

  4. Re:too bad you are running XP on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Okay, since the parent got an insightful, I'll try the same approach:

    XP sucks,
    technology has come far, which is cool,
    technology will go furher, which s also cool,
    The governmet sucks!

  5. Re:Modest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My Sun Sparc20 with the dual 75MHz CPUs is modest.. a PIII-500 is a fucking dream system.

  6. Re:I watch TV's on my computer... by gribbly · · Score: 2, Funny

    2.) Easy to glance at, no more turning my head. Face it, no matter how close your TV is, you'll have to turn your head.

    Yes, god forbid you should have to *turn your head*.

    Once again, technology to the rescue!

    --
    maybe
  7. Re:anonymous reviews by otherwhere · · Score: 3, Funny

    >Everyone could have an alterier motive. Or even an ulterior one.

  8. Re:anonymous reviews by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    So you're saying an anyonymous review has less credibilty than someone named, say CmdrTaco, or PunchMonkey??? :-)

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...