Slashdot Mirror


Intenet2 Backbone Upgrades

An anonymous reader "Looks like Abilene, the backbone for Internet2 will join Canada's CA*Net3 and Europe's GEANT as one of the fastest research networks on the planet. According to this press release, Internet2 will be deploying 11 of Juniper network's freshly announced T640 platform. These puppies can cram 32 OC-192 (or 128 OC-48) interfaces into a single chassis. All in half a rack, too!" I'm sure those students are very happy with their ping times. Meanwhile in the real world... ;)

7 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Whoops! sorry.... by nochops · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Designed for deterministic performance with 640-Gbps font-panel throughput and 1,280-Gbps rear-panel throughput"

    That's a lot of bandwidth killed if someone trips on the power cord.

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  2. Re:But Why? by Raindeer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ofcourse your joking. :-) And everybody knows MP3's don't take that much bandwidth. Movies do :-)

    But yes we do need that bandwidth. Espescially in Research and in Healthcare. I'm now doing some work on hooking up some healthcare organisations to glassfiber. They've done some interesting trials where they have several cameras and sensors looking at the patient, who is performing a walking excercise. The knowledge of the way a person is supposed to walk and the problems associated with that is scattered around the country. For half an hour they watch with several experts from across the country. Every doctor can interact with the patient and with each other. They can point things out to eachother etc. This results in better treatments and the identification of specific problems.

    The amount of bandwidth that is needed for this is quite high. 5 to 6 cams with real-time video and real-time sensor read outs and then real-time discussions over multiple locations. Now imagine they do this for multiple patients at the same time :-)

    And then ofcourse there was the doctor that asked us if he could send real-time MRI scans to colleagues in the USA. (an estimated 1Gbit+/second):-)

  3. More regions get connected by rutger21 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like Abilene, the backbone for Internet2 will join Canada's CA*Net3 and Europe's GEANT as one of the fastest research networks on the planet

    According to this page at Geante,

    An important element of GÉANT is the development of connectivity with equivalent Research Networks in other world regions. Connectivity is being consolidated with the existing equivalents of GÉANT in North America (Abilene, CA*net) and in Asia-Pacific (SINET, KOREN, SingAREN) and developed further between Europe and the Asia-Pacific, North American, South American and Mediterranean regions

    a bunch of extra regions get connected as well.

  4. ping time / bandwith by Eivind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You would expect the slashdot *editors* would have discovered the distinction between latency and troughput by now. 128 (or whatever) OC-12 running in parallell does not give you a lower ping-time than a single one. (unless your high ping is caused by congestion)

    What it does is allow you to transfer more data. Consider this analogy: Sending a hundred postcards at once doesn't make your message get there faster, but it *does* give you space for a longer message.

    Ofcourse Internet2 is also built to have low latencies, however the humongous bandwith doesn't contribute directly to this, except as in making congestion less likely.

  5. Re:Ping times? by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As a network administrator at an I2 University, I can tell you that your lamentable ping times are directly attributable to P2P apps. Throw more bandwidth at it? Wrong. We went from 1 DS-3 to 3 DS-3s and it took 2 days for the I2 and Dorm links to become saturated. Traffic analysis showed 75% to 80% of the traffic was FastTrack alone. Turn off your music sharing software and get the sorority girl next door to stop serving up 5000 songs to the world and your will see incredible performance increases. By doing some evil Cisco (the M$ of networking) proprietary tweaks we throttled Kazaa and other Fastrack type stuff and the performance rebounded. What happened next? The Helpdesk starts getting bitches about how slow Kazaa is! To be honest with you, when we get calls from kids complaining about the speeds of their online gaming, we laugh. I always have them read the Acceptible Use Policy and then tell them to get back to studying. We are not the intramural playing fields. Get over it.


    But these P2P apps adapt (simply because they are evil) and we are already seeing increases traffic. So guess what? We have to buy more bandwidth. I wonder if Joe Taxpayer likes the idea that his pennies on the dollar toward education go for through bandwidth at a blackhole so kids can playu Quake instead of studying. We roll the 622Mbps link on July 1 with one of those badass Juniper routers ($80000) to boot.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  6. The hay days of networking by kyoko21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    During the good old days of networking when I was at Virginia Tech, they had a pretty interesting setup. As far as I understood, VT used to sit on a NAP on the I2. The closer you were to the NAP, the fatter your pipe. There were some plans to open the NAP up for local residental access since most of the Blacksburg residents were students and faculty. I don't know if that was ever accomplished or not.

    Anyways, before digressing, VT's outgoing pipe had two logical interface. Any packets bound to universites or other educational institutions that had access to the I2 via their local NAP points, would go through the then established oc-3. (The pipe might be fatter now). Any other packets that were bound for networks outside of these destinations were forwarded through the dual t-3 that was used for 'all other traffic'.

    I onced did a traceroute to www.ucla.edu from a computer lab on campus during the middle of the day during the middle of the week and got amazing results. I found that there was only 8 hops between that desktop and the webserver that was in CA somewhere and all ping responses were less than 10ms. Talk about insane.

    I believe other schools share the same network setup as VT and i wouldn't be surprised many of those once old pipes have now been upgraded to fatter ones. Then again, MCI does have a lot of dark fiber laid around the AMTRAK rails that has yet lit up.

    However, despite with all this nice connection, I was recently told by several Virginia Tech on-campus residents that their connection has been capped up. I did some digging around and I believe that CNS is now capping the wall connections with the use of the catalyst 6500 catalysts from Cisco which I belive can limit network usage from reading all their marketing material... lol :-)

    Bottom line: Even if your organization or institutions had fat pipes to external networks, if your network capacity is limited from the point where you plug in your RJ45... don't expect to see blazing speeds).

    BTW, as far as I know, they got the ports to the residents dorms set up to 10mpbs half duplex... ewwwww...... :-/

  7. Traffic that goes over Ca*Net3 = (surprise!) KaZaA by _repressor_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been living on-campus at a canadian university for 2 years now and only recently discovered how amazing the research network is. (Our regular commercial line is really slow, slow enough to prompt the luckier, and geekyer, residents with TV to get cable internet in addition to the residence internet.)

    If you check out the traffic graphs, you can see that well over half the traffic is kazaa. (click on application-bits)

    http://205.189.33.73/www/flowscan/nrc.html

    Taxpayers' dollars hard at work indeed! The cool thing is that at most times these nodes aren't anywhere near their maximum data transfers at any time that I check them. That's probably just because nobody really knows about it and only use it if they happen to connect to someone else on the network and their university has the routing setup correctly... Also, not all the universities in Canada I've connected to make full use of the network, some limit bandwidth to their users even on this "free" (gov't subsidized) network. From what I hear though, the free part will soon change and the universities/gov't offices will have to pay for it in the upcoming years, but right now it's basically free bandwidth for those on the network.