Slashdot Mirror


DreamWorks Switches to Linux

tal-home writes "Newsforge has a story about the decision Dreamworks made to port ALL of their front-end servers and workstations to Linux. Their new movie, called 'Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron' which will hit the theaters in late May, was created in a 100% Linux enviroment, unlike older movies like Shrek and Lord of the Rings that used IRIX servers as a rendering farm. It's a good time to mention that this move by DreamWorks also includes porting the artists workstations to Linux, in addition to the servers. Redhat and HP helped out in the switch." Word has it that Adobe may be pursuing unix versions of it's toolset as DreamWorks isn't the only shop switching.

8 of 463 comments (clear)

  1. Shrek WAS rendered on Linux... by Ryu2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article summary is wrong. IRIX was used for frontend modelling. But Shrek WAS rendered finally on Linux -- indeed Shrek was distinctive as it was the first major full-length film to be totally rendered on Linux.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  2. "Fellowship of the Ring" also rendered on Linux by rogerbo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Clearly this guy didn't do his research, as others have pointed out Shrek was rendered on Linux, and Weta used a render farm of SGI 1200 Intel Linux boxes for "Lord of the Rings".

    See here:
    http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/linux/2 001/011 56783.html

    Weta used mostly SGI Octanes for 3D and compositing workstations so whats new about dreamworks is that they are switching all the artists workstations to Linux because already for several years now most big VFX houses have been using SGI and NT workstations and Linux render farms.

  3. Re:I need a better solution than boycotting Adobe. by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Do you pirate expensive software? If not, you have no reason to fear the DMCA."

    Not true. The DMCA prevents me from doing legitimate things, such as backing up a DVD I bought. Since I need DeCSS to do that in a useful manner, I'd be violating the DMCA because it circumvents copy protection.

    The DMCA takes away a number of our freedoms, even if we're working legitimately. THat's why we're fighting it.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  4. Re:A little surprised they switched Workstations t by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Informative

    "You could always try it on OS X..."

    Want to hear something interesting? LW 7.5 (and 7 I think..) has a license that explicitly lets you change between Mac and PC. I have a USB dongle with LW 7, so If I had a Mac around I could install LW on it. (I need the Mac disk, though...)

    I am sooooo happy with Newtek about this. I will be buying a new laptop within the next year, and I'm really having a tough time deciding between a PC Laptop and a Mac laptop. Now that I can run LW on either platform, I really don't have a whole lot of reason to not get a Mac. Now I can spend more time worrying about the color of the casing... *G*

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  5. Re:Isn't Bill Gates part owner of Dreamworks? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 3, Informative

    If G was for Gatesberg, I might have believed you. ;-). However, G is in fact for David Geffen.

    -Paul Komarek

  6. Re:Isn't Bill Gates part owner of Dreamworks? by wct · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dreamworks SKG is Spielberg, Katzenberg and G=David Geffen, as in Geffen Records.

  7. Re:Remember SKG? by pressman · · Score: 3, Informative

    No. The "G" in SKG is for Geffen, not Gates.

    --
    Pooty tweet
  8. Re:SSSCA was killed by MenTaLguY · · Score: 3, Informative

    CBDTPA, actually. If he searches for what you said I doubt he'll find anything. One wonders if they deliberately gave it an impossible-to-remember name. :P

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...