Video Games Not Protected Form of Speech
E-Rock writes "Video Games are lumped with child porn as unprotected forms of speech. "A federal judge said local governments can limit children's access to violent or sexually explicit video games, saying games are not constitutionally protected forms of speech." Story with limited details at Nando."
They're *entertainment*, not speech...
Unless someone comes out with a pro-[insert political agenda here] game, I'm gonna have a hard time swallowing that something like GTA3 or Final FantasyXXVVVIIII has some kind of constitutional protection...
-----
Is Darwin an evolutionary OS?
Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
Why can't parents, and not the government, keep their children from violent and explicit games? And why can't we have a few more judges that have some common sense?
Every day you see more and more proof that the left is gaining more and more ground in this country. Things like this where government protection seems to be the only solution, so we slowly learn to accept more and more governmental control.
Yeah, I know, T(H)GSB, but oh well. This is important to me.
--- witty signature
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
This says nothing about fucking video games.
-c
I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.