Slashdot Mirror


Nature's Building Blocks

The redoubtable Stella Daily writes: "For many, the word 'chemistry' brings up deliberately suppressed memories of acid-base titrations and annoying stoichiometry problems. 'Nature's Building Blocks' by John Emsley has the singular ability to take chemistry out of the tedium of the high school lab and bring to the reader the sort of childlike wonder that pioneering chemists like Mendeleev and Lavoisier must have had when making their discoveries." She's got a bit more to say about this book, below. Nature's Building Blocks author John Emsley pages 539 publisher Oxford University Press rating 8 reviewer Stella Daily ISBN 0-19-850341-5 summary Bedtime stories for chemists

From actinium to zirconium, Emsley covers each of the elements of the periodic table in alphabetical order and includes a short section on the periodic table arrangement itself. Though the result looks rather formidable at 500-plus pages, Nature's Building Blocks is less like a college chemistry text (or the staple of every chemist's bookshelf, the CRC Handbook), than like a collection of bedtime stories. For one thing, the book need not be read front to back; just pick an element, any element, and start wherever you like; it's not even necessary to read any chapter beginning to end. Each is broken down into cleverly named subtopics such as "Human Element," "Economic Element," and by far the most fun, "Element of Surprise." Besides information on the history, uses, origin, and chemistry of each element -- all of which are a pleasure to read -- Emsley uses the "Element of Surprise" section to present the reader with facts that range from the commonsensical "I never thought of that!" variety to the utterly unexpected and fascinating. The gee-whiz quality with which he writes is truly refreshing.

The book demands about a high-school knowledge of chemistry, though many sections can be read without even that much, and even lifelong chemists will find it full of surprises. The stories and facts gathered therein include the clever way Niels Bohr is said to have hidden his gold Nobel Prize medal from the Nazis when he fled Germany, how nonstick Teflon sticks to aluminum frying pans, how magnetic mines work, how the British government accidentally killed 31 of its own citizens with silver iodide, and, in the "Who Knew?" category, the fact that a piece of indium metal lets out a high-pitched shriek when bent. As you read, don't be surprised to find yourself saying the words "Too cool" aloud fairly frequently.

So why does this book get an eight instead of a nine or ten? Unfortunately, Emsley is a lot better at talking about the elements' history, usage, etc. than he is about their chemistry. He often seems to be unsure of whether the reader is a knowledgeable chemist or reading about the subject for the first time; in the chapter on silicon, for example, he explains why silicon dioxide is a neutral compound -- a no-brainer for anyone who's had high school chemistry -- but two paragraphs later says that silicon is part of n- and p-type semiconductors without explaining what the heck an n- or p-type semiconductor is. Elsewhere, the text contains serious errors that any half-decent copy editor should have caught. The periodic table section of the book contains the phrase, "Most hydrogen atoms consist of a single proton." In context, he means hydrogen as opposed to deuterium or tritium, whose nuclei contain neutrons in addition to protons, but a hydrogen atom consists of a single proton and an electron; a single proton is a hydrogen ion. This sort of careless error is common enough to be seriously annoying (and possibly deceiving to the chemistry beginner).

Though it must be read with the proverbial grain of sodium chloride, Nature's Building Blocks is a worthy read indeed -- the kind of book that can get people excited about a subject that usually inspires groans and protests of "I hate chemistry!" And for that, this former chemist is grateful indeed.

You can purchase Nature's Building Blocks from bn.com. Want to see your own review here? Just read the book review guidelines, then use Slashdot's handy submission form.

8 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. UK, tactically vote Liberal Democrat today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    • To choose Conservative or Labour is to choose to go the current way of America. Do you really want no public services but taxes as high as today? If so, show your affinity for the Tories. Do you want a lapdog for G. W. Bush for your leader? If so, show your affinity for Labour.
    • To not vote at all is to play on the apathy which has made Labour so strong. And we must take a warning from France as to what else abstainment will do!
    These are not general elections, so you may have individual causes that are important to you, and override the candidates' party affiliation. This is OK. But remember, the spirit of the nation is reflected in the sum of the attitudes of its individual people, which begins with local democracy.

    Yes, democracy is a mess, but think how much worse it is in countries where there is no opportunity at all to have a voice. Let's not lose what we have.

    1. Re:UK, tactically vote Liberal Democrat today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Why would a vote for the Liberal Democrats only be a tactical vote?

      >Let's not lose what we have.

      What do you mean? How would this happen? France isn`t going to get Le Pen as president - ain`t gonna happen. What the ruling parties should do is to take note of the fact that the one thing all the new wave of right-wing parties have in common is they are soaking up the votes of people unhappy with the way immigration is being managed. There is a difference between being racist, and not wanting loads and loads of people from particular parts of the world, and this difference is being lost on the mainstream parties, but is being lapped up by the BNP and whatever other nazi-lite parties exist.

    2. Re:UK, tactically vote Liberal Democrat today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Why would a vote for the Liberal Democrats only be a tactical vote?
      It wouldn't only be tactical to those who support the LD cause anyway. But to those who are undecided, or feel apathy, a sensible tactic in favour of change, independent thought, and democracy is to vote Liberal Democrat.

      France isn`t going to get Le Pen as president - ain`t gonna happen.
      Even though Le Pen is obviously not going to gain power this election, remember that to capture a vote a candidate needs to appeal to the electorate. So, future Presidents will take Le Pen's manifesto into account (i.e. by following some of its policies in one way or another) whenever they risk being voted out.

      This would never have happened if more voters for the traditional parties had got off their arses during the previous round of elections... the media, other nationalists, etc, would have nothing to ride on.

      Appealing to bullshit, as the Tory party did last election, is a desperate cry that inevitably results in the ruling party following suit in some way or another. That's why Blunkett could get away with saying that London schools are "swamped by asylum seekers" and then refuse to retract or apologise, despite the instant objection from several inner London headteachers.

      Don't show yourself as sheepish and apathetic, and your potential representatives won't resort to desperation and silliness.

    3. Re:UK, tactically vote Liberal Democrat today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      But to those who are undecided, or feel apathy, a sensible tactic in
      favour of change, independent thought, and democracy is to vote
      Liberal Democrat.


      By that reasoning, for those who dislike radical socialists, the best tactical vote is for a neo-fascist. Realistically, a guy like Buchanan or Le Pen has zero chance of winning a national election. But if their support gets bumped up a notch, it really scares the shit out of the left wing.

  2. Just do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    This is The Party you all should vote for!

    Voting for them breaks the two-party system and deprives the far-right of your apathetic vote.

  3. Re:Element of Surprise by oever · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It'll explode!

    --
    DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
  4. Re:Element of Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hey: for the MORON that moderated this offtopic, you suck or are stupid. Take your pick.

    The reason? If you know ANYTHING about chemistry at all, this is funny as hell.

  5. Re:Surely, by rosewood · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    i might read it and I hate chemistry

    but I hate chem due to my asshole science teacher

    He purposly tried to fail me (losing assignments, giving me no credit for a test)

    but I got even