OpenOffice.org Team Releases Version 1.0
DenialS writes: "Congratulations to the OpenOffice.org team! Version 1.0 of the open office suite has been released. I'm downloading it now; I've had good luck with the previous stable builds. Release notes haven't been posted yet, so I can't say what the major differences are between 1.0 and the previous stable build, 641d, but I'm looking forware to finding out!"
Anyway, there's a press release available on the mailing list (and assumedly somewhere else). From what I gather from glancing over it, it doesn't contain any useful information, but maybe someone can extract something out of it or pass it on to his boss.
The release notes are available too. There's no changelog as such, but it says
Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
As usual. I don't suppose anyone has a list of mirrors?
your point? it dont matter what the tool is written in, what matters is does it work. oh, maybe you're one of those anti-Java nutcases taht still think Java's slow as molasses. HEre's why you think that: JRE 1.1 was a pos in terms of performance (and fwiw, everything else), and is now long outdated. It's also the version that MS embraced/extended to misrepresent real Java, which adds to the confusion. The current version is 1.4, and uses HotSpot, which does compiles bytecode down to native at run-time, and can match speeds with any native application.
The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
The link appears to be slashdotted already, as it produces an error page on my browser.
Btw, something I don't understand about the slashdot effect. If slashdot can take all of these users who MUST have come to slashdot before following the link, how comes th sites to which slashdot links crash when slashdot users go there?
social sciences can never use experience to verify their statemen