Slashdot Mirror


21.3" LCD Monitor Reviewed

SLDave wrote in to plug his review of the 21" NEC MultiSync LCD 2110, the monster LCD that lists for a scant $3800. The largest Apple screen is cheaper, and I'm not sure how I would feel about being forced into 1600x1200 all the time. And at the price of a decent used car? Update: 05/01 18:31 GMT by T : ARP has another idea, writing: "Here is a review of Samsung's 210T which is another 21.3" LCD. Not only is this cheaper than the NEC, but it also has DVI as well as RCA and S-video inputs that turn into a high-definition multimedia display."

2 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Re:A review of... a monitor? by selectspec · · Score: 1, Redundant

    LCD monitors don't have refresh rates.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  2. Resolution matters by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1, Redundant

    1600x1200 != 1280x1024