NASA Eyes Shuttle Replacements
jonerik writes "According to this article at Space.com, NASA yesterday released a status report on the first year of NASA's Space Launch Initiative; the search for a space shuttle replacement, currently planned to begin operating ten years from now. The competing contractors - Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and a team consisting of Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Corp. - have their work cut out for them. NASA is looking for both a ten-fold improvement in per-pound launch costs (from $10,000 per pound to $1,000) and massive improvements in crew survivability."
In related news, Rubyflame writes: "Aviation Now has a
story about four new kerosene-fueled rocket engines being developed by Aerojet, Pratt & Whitney, Rocketdyne, and TRW. These are engines that will produce a million pounds of thrust, intended to outdo Russian designs in reliability and launch cost, and one of them may power a new reusable launch vehicle. Kerosene has the advantage that it's denser than hydrogen, so the fuel tanks can be smaller."
Oh my god, what kind of monster have I created?
I've opened the haiku box, and now, there's no way to stuff the verse back inside...
Oh, the humanity!!!
Mod this guy up, He sure knows his shit, Oh do it, God Damn It!!!
I sig, therefore I was.
There once was a posting to Slashdot
By a man wielding plus two who dare not
Make plus one the score
Of his posting, a door
Away from his boredom and skull-rot
I had to post the moderations on this:
/. coder #218
Moderation Totals: Offtopic=1, Funny=3, Overrated=1, Underrated=2, Total=7.
And yet, my Karma went up... 2 points.
"Math? I don't need no stinkin' math!." -
My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so