Salon on Video Games and Free Speech
EyesWideOpen writes: "There is an article at Salon that covers a U.S. District Judge's ruling that computer games don't deserve First Amendment protection. The ruling is in response to The Interactive Digital Software Association's request for the dismissal of an ordinance that requires parental consent before children under 17 can buy or play violent or sexually explicit video games. From the Salon article: 'From his ruling, [US District Judge] Limbaugh appears to believe that no amount of contextual information, or additional narrative, in a game is enough to make it a work of art or expression worthy of the name 'free speech.'' The judge's deliberations were based in part on his review of four games: 'Fear Effect,' 'Doom,' 'Mortal Kombat' and 'Resident Evil'."
with that list I'm suprised he didn't make video games illegal.
Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
The Judge's first name was Rush?
Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
I offer this as an example of what probably happened to him while he was playing.
qslack.com
The time for a counterstrike is now.
Supreme LAAAAAAAAAN Party!
Buy a Nintendo DS Lite
[T]he Court simply did not find the 'extensive plot and character development' referred to by the plaintiffs in the games it viewed
Someone should donate Everquest so the Judge can play it. I bet in three months he will be out of courts. Wearing black rags with a sword in his hands, and shouting "l00t!".
Than we can talk if it doesn't help to develop a character...
Buy a Nintendo DS Lite
do you know how frustrating it is to post the same opinion before you (twice actually), and not have anyone read it?
I brought this up before...
and above in this very thread also
The moderation system is just so frustrating these days...