Slashdot Mirror


Another DMCA Attack Looms

ndege writes "In this Wired article, Rep. Rick Boucher is finally ready to try and dismantle a key part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Boucher, a Virginia Democrat, said last July that he wanted to amend the DMCA to permit certain 'fair uses' of digital content, such as backing up an audio CD by bypassing copy protection technology. In an interview on Thursday, Boucher said he now has sufficient support from the tech industry, librarians, and Internet activists."

9 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. How about repealing it? by TechnoLust · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Copyrighted music was already protected under copyright law. Fair use was already protected under other laws. Why do we keep writing and amending and rewriting laws that do the SAME THING as previous laws?

    The only thing the DMCA did was make it hard on cryptographers, security analysts, and researchers to do their jobs and report their results. You want unbreakable crypto? (Well, that will likely never happen, but do you want it to be so hard that it isn't worth the effort?) Then honest people have to try to break it and report on it's strengths and weaknesses. If you pass a million laws saying you can't circumvent encryption, someone in another country where our laws don't apply can still do it. People in America who aren't going to obey the laws anyway can still do it. And people who wouldn't steal the music, but just want to break it for the challenge will still do it.

    It is illegal to steal cars, but "slim-jims" are legal, why? Because they can help you get your car open if you lock your keys in. Shouldn't it be legal for me to make a backup copy of my CD in case I drop the original in the lake while on my boat? With the DMCA as it stands, if that disk is copy protected, it is ILLEGAL for me to do that.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
  2. Responds to E-mail Too! by JLester · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a constituent of Boucher's, I sent an e-mail to him after his CNet interview a couple of months ago thanking him for his support of fair use for digital media. He sent a very nice response detailing how fair use rights for digital media is one of his highest priorities. His fair-use rights included custom compilation CDs and circumventing technological protection measures in order to archive or excerpt material. The last part really covers almost anything we've been worried about.

    He also stated that the potential to penalize and prosecute individuals who excercise such rights is an affront to First Amendment protections, a harm to consumers, and inhibits the creation and public use of intellectual property!

    To say I'm glad to be represented by him is an understatement.

    Jason

    --
    "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  3. Hey Rep. Boucher by Spackler · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best thing you could do for the DMCA, and copyright law in general, is to go down the hall and beat the crap out of Senator Fritz Hollings!

  4. A letter from Congressman Boucher by jhines0042 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What follows is the thank you letter that I received from Congressman Boucher for writing him about this subject.


    Congress of the United States

    House of Representatives

    Rick Boucher

    9th District, Virginia

    NINTHNET@mail.house.gov

    HTTP://www.house.gov/boucher/

    May 3, 2002

    Thank you for your kind expression of support for my efforts to prevent the erosion of fundamental fair use rights in the digital era.

    Please be assured that reaffirming the rights of consumers to exercise legitimate fair use rights is among my highest priorities. From such routine practices as making custom compilation CDs of lawfully-acquired songs for personal use to more advanced actions such as circumventing technological protection measures in order to archive or excerpt material for research and educational purposes, the American public traditionally has enjoyed the ability to make convenience and incidental copies of copyrighted works without obtaining the prior consent of the copyright owner. The potential to penalize or prosecute individuals who exercise such rights, or who create or publish software and devices which facilitate the exercise of individual fair use rights, affronts First Amendment protections, harms consumers, and ultimately inhibits the creation and public use of intellectual property.

    As Co-Chairman of the Congressional Internet Caucus, my work in Congress focuses on the intersection of the Internet and other technologies with our nation's intellectual property laws. I intend to introduce various legislative measures which will protect fair use rights, and your expression of support for these efforts with your Congressional representatives will be most welcome.

    I appreciate your taking the time to share your views with me. With kind regards and best wishes, I remain

    Sincerely,

    Rick Boucher
    Member of Congress

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  5. The problem with the DMCA by Qwerpafw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The inherent issue here is not actually copyright law, but the failure of the political system.

    Here we have an issue that is disliked by everyone that knows about it, and fundamentally runs against several precepts of the constitution (and the original idea behind copyright law).

    Yet it is law. Why? Because it allows media companies to increase their profits. Yet even that is debatable. A better description of the DMCA is that it allows media companies to think that they are increasing their profits.

    And because of the money involved, these companies have a bunch of cash to blow on lobbyists. Media companies are very very large, and, as a result, have an enormous financial intrest in Washington.

    So only the little guys are left. Librarians, Internet activists, and some tech companies (some. Microsoft seems to back the DMCA. Most try to be DRM neutral.). The problem is that the little guys don't have enough cash to buy the best politicians. Yes, buy politicians. So we have to find semi-honest politicians who agree with the cause. Which is near-hopeless.

    Of course, the ban on soft money should help, but the underlying problem is the same. Washington is dominated by corporate interests. The only real fix is to make digital rights management and the abhorration that is the DMCA a public issue. Only then will people look at a politicians record vis a vis copy protection come november. And only then will justice finally be done.

  6. Yellow Journalism Email? by mikeboone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remeber a couple years ago there was a chain-type email going around warning people that congress was going to start charging $ to send email or something like that. It was pretty inflamatory, but looked somewhat legitimate by naming people and bill numbers (even though they were fake if I remember). I believe congress got tons of calls and mail about this issue.

    So someone needs to write up an inflamatory email about not being able to listen to your CDs anymore, due to Senator Smith and his bill S.9876. Then we just start forwarding it to everybody, and let them get on their congresscritters.

    1. Re:Yellow Journalism Email? by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, 100 people showing up in person is worth a LOT more than 10,000 people sending in e-mail.

      Yes, except that 100,000 people getting an inflammatory chain letter, espeically if it gets press coverage, can have a strong "chilling effect" on any legislation even remotely related.

      A while back, there was some consideration about changing US coin designs (something that's way overdue in many collectors' opinions, including mine). An incorrect rumor got started that congress was going to remove "In God We Trust" from coins, a call-in and letter-writing campaign ensued, and the legitimate legislation (which NEVER contemplated removing any of the currently mandated legends or devices) died a swift and silent death.

      I've often wondered about whether some of the chain letters out there weren't deliberately placed. Maybe taking a page from Ayn Rand or Ender's Game (Demosthenes, etc.) would be an effective way to get stuff done. After all, it's all about public opinion, and the best way to sway that is with FUD, as we all know too well.

      Of course, it's sort of stooping to "their" level, but sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.

      I wrote a nice rant about this some time ago, but I can't manage to find it with /.'s lousy search system. Something about "modem tax" and "chain letters" and such, to try to get "normal people" inflamed and calling their representatives. Does anyone know of a way to search *all* of one person's postings?

  7. Give this man your cash by RandomPeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the US of A, it is perfectly legal for any American to purchase any politician. You don't need to be from Virgina to contribute to Mr. Boucher's reelection efforts. I'm sure certain nefarious organizations will fund his opponents. Do your part and keep this guy from getting crushed for standing up to legalized racketeering.

    1. Re:Give this man your cash by Rinikusu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My question is, why haven't we done this already? Why don't we have a political action group? For example, Senator Hollings is in SC. Even though we may not be from SC, we can sure be pissed off at what he does. So, why don't we start a group that targets Sen. Hollings and contributes to his opponent's campaigns, media campaigns, etc, to educate HIS constituency of the things he's doing to screw EVERYONE over? What's to stop someone from buying up billboard space in downtown Charleston, SC and putting up ads that read "Sen. Hollings thinks YOU are a criminal" with maybe a link to a website with a rational, well reasoned point by point explanation of the son-of-SSSCA (forgot the new version) and why that means the consumer is a criminal. And Etc. We may be few across the states, but together, we may get people out of office and then Congress will realize that they, once again, serve the PEOPLE, not corporate "interests". Think of it as concentrated firepower, m'kay?

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai