Slashdot Mirror


Michael Smith Leaves Core

Donald Burr of Borg writes "Following in the footsteps of Jordan Hubbard, Michael Smith leaves the FreeBSD core team. Reasons cited are similar to those that jkh gave, including displeasure at the bureacracy and politicking, and FreeBSD not being "fun" anymore."

1 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. Text of the email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I stood for election to the FreeBSD core team nearly two years
    ago, many of you will recall that it was after a long series of
    debates during which I maintained that too much organisation, too many
    rules and too much formality would be a bad thing for the project.

    Today, as I read the latest discussions on the future of the FreeBSD
    project, I see the same problem; a few new faces and many of the old
    going over the same tired arguments and suggesting variations on the
    same worthless schemes. Frankly I'm sick of it.

    FreeBSD used to be fun. It used to be about doing things the right
    way. It used to be something that you could sink your teeth into when
    the mundane chores of programming for a living got you down. It was
    something cool and exciting; a way to spend your spare time on an
    endeavour you loved that was at the same time wholesome and
    worthwhile.

    It's not anymore. It's about bylaws and committees and reports and
    milestones, telling others what to do and doing what you're told.
    It's about who can rant the longest or shout the loudest or mislead
    the most people into a bloc in order to legitimise doing what they
    think is best. Individuals notwithstanding, the project as a whole
    has lost track of where it's going, and has instead become obsessed
    with process and mechanics.

    So I'm leaving core. I don't want to feel like I should be "doing
    something" about a project that has lost interest in having something
    done for it. I don't have the energy to fight what has clearly become
    a losing battle; I have a life to live and a job to keep, and I won't
    achieve any of the goals I personally consider worthwhile if I remain
    obligated to care for the project.

    Discussion
    ==========

    I'm sure that I've offended some people already; I'm sure that by the
    time I'm done here, I'll have offended more. If you feel a need to
    play to the crowd in your replies rather than make a sincere effort to
    address the problems I'm discussing here, please do us the courtesy
    of playing your politics openly.

    From a technical perspective, the project faces a set of challenges
    that significantly outstrip our ability to deliver. Some of the
    resources that we need to address these challenges are tied up in the
    fruitless metadiscussions that have raged since we made the mistake
    of electing officers. Others have left in disgust, or been driven
    out by the culture of abuse and distraction that has grown up since
    then. More may well remain available to recruitment, but while
    the project is busy infighting our chances for successful outreach
    are sorely diminished.

    There's no simple solution to this. For the project to move forward,
    one or the other of the warring philosophies must win out; either the
    project returns to its laid-back roots and gets on with the work, or
    it transforms into a super-organised engineering project and executes a
    brilliant plan to deliver what, ultimately, we all know we want.

    Whatever path is chosen, whatever balance is struck, the choosing and
    the striking are the important parts. The current indecision and
    endless conflict are incompatible with any sort of progress.

    Trying to dissect the above is far beyond the scope of any parting
    shot, no matter how distended. All I can really ask of you all is to
    let go of the minutiae for a moment and take a look at the big
    picture. What is the ultimate goal here? How can we get there with
    as little overhead as possible? How would you like to be treated by
    your fellow travellers?

    Shouts
    ======

    To the Slashdot "BSD is dying" crowd - big deal. Death is part of the
    cycle; take a look at your soft, pallid bodies and consider that right
    this very moment, parts of you are dying. See? It's not so bad.

    To the bulk of the FreeBSD committerbase and the developer community
    at large - keep your eyes on the real goals. It's when you get
    distracted by the politickers that they sideline you. The tireless
    work that you perform keeping the system clean and building is what
    provides the platform for the obsessives and the prima donnas to have
    their moments in the sun. In the end, we need you all; in order to
    go forwards we must first avoid going backwards.

    To the paranoid conspiracy theorists - yes, I work for Apple too. No, my
    resignation wasn't on Steve's direct orders, or in any way related to work
    I'm doing, may do, may not do, or indeed what was in the tea I had at
    lunchtime today. It's about real problems that the project faces, real
    problems that the project has brought upon itself. You can't escape them
    by inventing excuses about outside influence, the problem stems from
    within.

    To the politically obsessed - give it a break, if you can. No, the
    project isn't a lemonade stand anymore, but it's not a world-spanning
    corporate juggernaut either and some of the more grandiose visions
    going around are in need of a solid dose of reality. Keep it simple,
    stupid.

    To the grandstanders, the prima donnas, and anyone that thinks that
    they can hold the project to ransom for their own agenda - give it a
    break, if you can. When the current core were elected, we took a
    conscious stand against vigorous sanctions, and some of you have
    exploited that. A new core is going to have to decide whether to
    repeat this mistake or get tough. I hope they learn from our errors.

    Future
    ======

    I started work on FreeBSD because it was fun. If I'm going to
    continue, it has to be fun again. There are things I still feel
    obligated to do, and with any luck I'll find the time to meet those
    obligations.

    However I don't feel an obligation to get involved in the political
    mess the project is in right now. I tried, I burnt out. I don't feel
    that my efforts were worthwhile. So I won't be standing for election,
    I won't be shouting from the sidelines, and I probably won't vote in
    the next round of ballots.

    You could say I'm packing up my toys. I'm not going home just yet,
    but I'm not going to play unless you can work out how to make the
    project somewhere fun to be again.

    = Mike

    --
    To announce that there must be no criticism of the president,
    or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not
    only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to
    the American public. - Theodore Roosevelt