Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Benchmarking Intel C++ 6.0 to GNU g++ 3.0.4

Posted by timothy on from the religious-fervor dept.

axehind writes: "Here is a good article detailing a benchmark [comparison] between the two compilers. The results are very interesting."

4 of 59 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Intel Compiler & Exceptions by lprimak · · Score: 3, Informative

    Intel compiler works great, except for handling exceptions in a multi-threaded program. The exception stacks get mangled if multiple threads throw/catch exceptions at the same time. gcc exception handling is completely thread-local so there is no locking and it works great. That's why I can't use icc for my own product. My info is about 3 months old. I wonder if they fixed this...?

    --
    Lenny Primak PP-ASEL-IA,Heli
  2. Re:Inlining slows performance? by V.+Mole · · Score: 4, Informative

    What can happen with inlining is that code size expands to be larger than the available CPU cache memory. (Re-)Loading code from main memory (or slower cache, for CPU's with multi-level caches) is slower than a few register updates. You can see the same effect with loop-unrolling, although given the way CPU caches have grown means it's becomeing less of a factor.

    Note in particular the article's observation that "inlining doesn't show any slowdown" is exactly that: an observation, applicable to that particular processor. A serious project would have to benchmark their particular application on their particular target machine to determine the best choice of compiler options.

  3. Official Addendum by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 5, Informative

    At the least the site stayed running with the spike in hits...

    I'm putting together some "large" benchmarks for the "rematch" when gcc 3.1 hits reality next week. The problem with most "real world" programs is that they're interactive or I/O bound, masking the code generator's abilities.

    I need to be clear about one thing: Anyone who tosses out gcc over this review is a fool. Intel C++ is a good product for very specific applications, but it does not replace gcc. All the benchmarks show is that Intel C++ can provide a performance boost for certain classes of computationally-bound programs. For some of my scientific work, Intel kicks ass in comparison to gcc... for some other projects, gcc comes out on top. What's important is choice and competition, which fuel evolution...

    I urge people to read the entire article before making any assumptions about my goals or the results.

    --
    All about me
  4. Profiling feedback by Skuto · · Score: 3, Informative

    They missed the most important part: profile feedback optimizations.

    This is one part where Intel C really gets way and beyond the GCC compiler. Compile first with -prof_genx, run program, recompile with -prof_use.

    The speedups are _big_. Intel C will totally kick GCC's butt with this option enabled.

    GCC can also do profiling feedback optimizations, but it is not nearly as good.

    --
    GCP