Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars: AOTC Reviews Pour In

Dork King writes "The New York Time's Review of AOTC (free reg, yada yada) notes that Attack of the Clones doesn't look good for fans. Thankfully, I'm not a fan." Also, dw5000 writes "The BBC has a favorable review of Attack of the Clones on its news website, as well as an executive summary of what the UK papers are saying about AotC. The populist tabloids love it, while the broadsheets are giving cautious approval. Hmm. Maybe I won't wait for DVD ..." I also noticed Variety has a review up as well. Also, for those who have lost all hope for Star Wars, I submit to you the date of the Spider-Man sequel: May 7th, 2004. You should know that spoilers exist in one or more of these stories. Beware!

3 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Overwhelmingly Positive Reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    slashdot is just about dead, in case you havne't noticed, this website just plain sucks!. They cant' afford a decent editing crew, 'cause they are to poor, they spent all their IPO money. Now they are begging for donations. How pathetic is that?

  2. Give me a break! by bumbadi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You americans think always think starwars is the greatest thing in the universe. I am reaaaally bored with this! Sigh. somehow people fighting with tubelights entertains people.

    --
    When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson
  3. NYT can't spell by Iberian · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    In the article the use the word "beleaguered" however spell it as "beleagured". How can we expect our children to learn when our most recognized newspapper prints such fallacies.