Slashdot Mirror


Historic Bucky Dome Needs Help

Anonymous Coward writes "Buckminster Fuller's Geodesic Dome is falling apart and one man hopes to save it. Read more at http://www.msnbc.com/news/748889.asp?0bl=-0" The Buckminster Fuller Institute has a page on the dome, which has contact info for donations.

178 comments

  1. Heh by NiftyNews · · Score: 2

    Not as much of a perfect, long-lasting structure as they thought, eh?

    1. Re:Heh by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The funny thing about Geodesic domes is that the bigger you build it, the stronger it gets. From the picture in the article, this one is downright tiny. Small wonder it's 'only' lasted 48 years, 30 of them with little or no maintenance.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  2. For those who are into into chemistry... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "Buckminsterfullerene" is a form of carbon where 60 carbon atoms are bonded together into a large molecule that resembles a soccer ball. It is also called C60 or a "Bucky Ball." This "Buckminster Fuller Geodesic Dome" I would suspect is some sort of large bucky ball representation.

    1. Re:For those who are into into chemistry... by Qwerpafw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      its the other way around.

      Buckminster Fuller designed the geodesic dome, which is supposed to be an ultra-stable, aesthetically pleasing dome structure.

      Then they discovered C60, which looked remerkably like of of buckminsterfuller's domes. And, being fans, the researchers named it after him. Its a cooler name than "diamond." :) (diamond is another form of carbon. Graphite is, too. Its all about how the carbon is arranged)

      Of course, considering how crucial C60's formation and structure is to carbon nanotubules research, one would think that all the companies making money off (or planning to) it would at least be generous enough to support its namesake. But thats neither here nor there.

    2. Re:For those who are into into chemistry... by baywulf · · Score: 1

      Lets try some C4 on the C60 then.

    3. Re:For those who are into into chemistry... by gimpboy · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Of course, considering how crucial C60's formation and structure is to carbon nanotubules research, one would think that all the companies making money off (or planning to) it would at least be generous enough to support its namesake. But thats neither here nor there.


      you would think so, but very few companies are making money off nanotubules. while the demand is there, the inability to mass produce nanotubes has prevented any industry from taking advantage of their unique characteristics.

      i spoke with someone a few weeks ago from the doe. they basically said the word 'nano' is more of a fad and the people in the funding agencies dont see much promise in the near future (10 years or so). in the last few years, people have been sneaking the 'n' prefix into grant titles to increase the chance of funding. since little industrial applicability has resulted, it appears funding is going to shift more into the biomedical arena.

      --
      -- john
    4. Re:For those who are into into chemistry... by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      well, C60 is a molecule. C4 is a mix of RDX and a clay-likee compound. RDX is Rapid Detonating Explosive or Hexahydro-Trinitro-Triazine or Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (CAS Number 121-82-4) depending on whome you ask. It is a versital and interesting explosive, and actually has some carbon in it, but is not related to C60. As for blowing up a geodesic dome, the mix of pentagons and hexagons could be weakened most by blowing up the hexagons, as those are the structually important parts (each being surrounded by 6 pentagons) so you get structual damage to 7 parts.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    5. Re:For those who are into into chemistry... by interiot · · Score: 1

      Cool Bucky Ball java applet here.

    6. Re:For those who are into into chemistry... by interiot · · Score: 2

      testing 1

  3. the old builders again! by 56ker · · Score: 2

    " It can be built relatively cheaply with environmentally friendly materials." - the same problem we had. The government built a lot of council high-rise flats from re-inforced concrete in the 60s. Now a lot of them are crumbling too.

  4. Easy way to get money by vspazv · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just pull out all the windows and sell it to the government as a historical "Mental Health and Relaxation Facilitator" (monkey bars)for $100,000 and build a new one with the profits.

    1. Re:Easy way to get money by SiskellAndEbert · · Score: 0

      Ebert: This is the stupidest fucking idea i have ever heard. What a jackass!

      Siskel: THUMBS DOWN BIAAAAAAAAAATCH!~!!!!!!!!~!@!

  5. a cry for help by tps12 · · Score: 1, Troll
    I think this is something that every slashdot reader can get behind. Far be it from me to attempt to voice the concerns of the community, but Mr. Fuller deserves the respect of us all after his work in architecture that lead to important discovers in chemistry.

    This is a landmark that should be preserved at all costs. I don't think any of us will have a problem giving a small portion of our incomes to such a worthy cause. Since we are all good Americans, none of us should mind paying a nominal tax in honor of the greatest Buckminster than we have ever known.

    God bless.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:a cry for help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I would, but then I get that damned msnid "no cookies" page again, and I hit my back button and do a big eyeball roll and a dramatic sigh and blame Buckminster Fuller and his stupid geodesic domes for it. Bill Gates too. To hell with 'em.

    2. Re:a cry for help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are incredibly empty and lame.

      I for one just sent $500 to restore the dome. When it becomes a visitor's center you can go to look but you'd probably be too busy wanking off to television.

      Well, you're still welcome to see the dome when we get it fixed. I hope it inspires something in you.

      (I'm glad /. ran this story because Fuller doesn't get enough exposure to the general readers of this site.)

  6. where's the positive stuff? by dbrower · · Score: 3, Insightful

    bucky domes are/were the perfect thing for protecting radar antennas from the elements, and for covering the tops of large otherwise open tanks.

    they're not so good for building houses, though, as a retrospective shows -- the labor to fit drywall, the impossibility of making windows and roofing that don't leak, the impedence mismatches of standard rectanglar building materials and furniture; all make life with a dome a pain and not very cost effective.

    but cool, man. the big dome in montreal for expo 70 was awsome; it too fell into disrepair.

    -dB

    --
    "It if was easy to do, we'd find someone cheaper than you to do it."
    1. Re:where's the positive stuff? by zer0vector · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I thought the domes didn't so much protect the antennas from the elements as hide which direction the antenna was pointed. With satellite photography what it is now, it becomes very easy to see things as big as antennas and see exactly where they are looking. The domes probably did a little bit of both.

      --

      ----
      Striving to put right what once went wrong, and hoping each time that his next leap, will be the leap ho
    2. Re:where's the positive stuff? by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Yes - I remember reading a story about a person who lived in a round house getting a wall to wall wardrobe. They were told it'd take only two days - ended up taking two weeks!

    3. Re:where's the positive stuff? by thatnerdguy · · Score: 0

      the big dome in montreal for expo 70 was awsome; it too fell into disrepair.

      Actually, it was Expo 67 and the dome has been reopened as a Biosphere. It houses displays concerning mostly water pollution and stuff like that.


      GO HABS GO
      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    4. Re:where's the positive stuff? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Actually I thought the domes didn't so much protect the antennas from the elements as hide which direction the antenna was pointed. With satellite photography what it is now, it becomes very easy to see things as big as antennas and see exactly where they are looking. The domes probably did a little bit of both.

      The NWS puts protective domes around their NEXRAD dishes. Since they have no reason to hide the dishes from spying eyes, one can assume that its purpose is protecting the dish from inclement weather. Of course, they're not entirely successful.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    5. Re:where's the positive stuff? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      The domes were built pretty cheaply and with a few decades of neglect, they just won't last. The upside is the weight of the structure is very light and makes for a good cover in many environments and situations. Maybe its not the best design for a house, but then again it was never considered very seriously by real estate developers. Which usually means no pre-fab easy to install indoor components, lazy roofing (they can be sealed easily), prohibitive price because of small production, etc.

    6. Re:where's the positive stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're such a genius. Why don't you go study up on what "radome" means. Who modded this useless fuck as informative?

    7. Re:where's the positive stuff? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Why are you using the past tense? They're still used today - Menwith Hill in the UK has dozens of them.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    8. Re:where's the positive stuff? by domebot · · Score: 1

      I think you need to be updated on todays Domes. I built mine in 1999 from a kit and it has over 4,500 sf of finished space, none of which leaks. I have 7 trianglar windows (6' on a side, two are skylites) along with other woindows, which do not leak either. The manufacturer of my dome has been in business more than 30 yrs and have more than a thousand domes to their credit. Most people don't use dry wall on their dome interior (only on vertical walls), but you can, I have Spruce T&G paneling on mime. The biggest misconception is that domes are round, NOT; they are many short (~8' horz.) straight walls; what furniture doesn;t fit on an 8' wall? I do admit that I have no rooms in my house with 4-90 degree corners and 4 walls (most rooms are lucky to have 1-90 degree corner and less than 5 walls). My dome was made from standard 2x4/2x6 lumber, and 4x8 sheating with very little waste. I also have 18" between the roof and the ceiling with 16" of insulation (I heat & cool for the cost of a 2200sf house). But the real "cool" things are: 28ft ceilings; a skyloft/cupola pentagon room with windows on all sides and is not supported from below (think, inside tree house; clear spans of 50' across because no bearing walls are required; a large flying area for my RC blimp; no hallways; and lots of "wows" from visitors. Conventional houses are boxes with windows, domes are thinking outside the box! Lastly, re "cost effective", well, my home cost $285,000 to build, has 4,500sf of living space that uses the same energy as a 2,200sf home; what is not effective? I enjoy my "pain" very much!!!

      --
      domebot...carpet-denim!
  7. $100 by tiwason · · Score: 1

    So far, Perk has only raised $100 for repairs, but he's undeterred

    He bought it in 1999.. has $100 out of $100,000. and is 70... he better get a move on it... (Guess story on MSNBC is a start..)

  8. dymaxion house by Keev · · Score: 5, Informative

    Less well known than the Geodesic Dome is Fuller's Dymaxion House, a very cool hangout in my opinion with lots of features like "O-volving" shelves built in. See the nice restoration project pages at the Henry Ford Museum for more info.

    --
    A man, a plan, a canal: Suez!
    1. Re:dymaxion house by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      Speaking of Dymaxions, I've always been a fan of his 3-wheeled Dymaxian automobiles.

      20 feet long, V8-powered, 120MPH max, 25-30 MPG, zero turning radius. Impressive specs from the early 1930's that are often not matched by today's vehicles.

    2. Re:dymaxion house by 56ker · · Score: 2

      And for those people who don't know what o-volving refers to hopefully this sentence will help out : "Among the many novel features to enhance the use of storage space were what Fuller called O-volving shelf containers, which were mounted on a continuous chain system behind a partition whereby the equivalent of an 18ft stack of shelves could be rotated electrically until the desired shelf levelled with the access hatch."

    3. Re:dymaxion house by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Question is did you actually know what o-volving was before I wrote that?

    4. Re:dymaxion house by tuxit2 · · Score: 1

      The Dymaxion house seems very much like a Yurt constructed from more costly materials.

    5. Re:dymaxion house by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      It'd suck to blow a tire on that thing...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  9. Only raised $100? by Man+of+E · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty shocked that since 1999 when he bought the place to restore it, he only managed to raise $100 for renovation!!! Either he's incompetent (which I doubt), or he just hasn't been trying very hard. So why the sudden push now all of a sudden?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig
  10. well... by dangermouse · · Score: 2
    The article did say that only one man hopes to save it. I imagine he didn't have much more than $100 after forking over the 50 Gs to buy it in the first place.

    I for one fail to see the historic significance of this thing. Yes, it was the only dome Fuller ever lived in. So what? He himself sold the damn thing.

    Aside from being a very slightly distinguished example of a concept that utterly failed to revolutionize housing as we know it, it's just a house. I can respect that it was this guy's buddy's house, but apparently it's nevertheless a shoddily maintained moneypit with not much else to recommend it. Bulldoze it and reuse the land.

  11. Jesus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are you finding this stuff? I like to be ready to dump pages of potentially offensive trash onto this site, too.

  12. Re:WHo cares ? What is the point ? by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    research into geometry ???

  13. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fantastic link.

    Now I need to find a nonsense generator, and some Nigerian bank scam letters. The arsenal is young, but growing.

  14. Photos/Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, I would take photos of the building then tear it down. Photos and a website will be good enough if somebody wants to know anything about it. It is obviously that it is not worth to keep it up with maintenance for next many years. I am assuming that this designer just want to build to "show" that it can be done, not for long-term purpose. If anyone wants something to last, someone would've done it better in first place.

  15. correction by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2

    Uh, that subject should have read:

    "For those who are NOT into chemistry..."

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Hmmm....seems to be going about it the wrong way by Dynedain · · Score: 2

    from the article:

    He is also considering bequeathing the dome to SIU in his will.
    He believes the university should buy the building or pay for its renovation.


    If he wants the university to buy it from him, why did he say he might give it to them in his will? Now all they have to do is wait for him to croak (and he looks fairly elderly from the picture)

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  18. My house also needs help by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    My house is also falling apart. How do I get it nationally recognized as a historical landmark?

    The frost on the roof once resembled Buckminster's face (although he was missing a nostril). Is this enough to qualify?

    1. Re:My house also needs help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My house is also falling apart. How do I get it > nationally recognized as a historical
      > landmark?

      What have *YOU* done? What's your contribution to the world? Do you know all that Fuller did? You probably didn't learn about him in school, did you? I bet you don't know a thing about him. You don't sound very smart.

    2. Re:My house also needs help by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Buckminster does not currently *live* in that building. However, I don't see anybody questioning the accomplishments of the *current* dwellers.

  19. You'd think that... by newerbob · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...the dot-com whiz-kids that run /. could have cleaned up that URL a bit.

    I mean, 10 seconds of experimentation shows that http://www.msnbc.com/news/748889.aspworks just as well, and is at least 30% less messy looking.

    --

    --
    Ask the Ya-Hoot Oracle Anything!
  20. Name ONE person... by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

    Name one person who DOESNT need(or want) money? It'd be one thing to give to a local charity, or donate time somewhere local, but SUBSUDISE a house renovation project??

    Fuck it. Let it rot.

    1. Re:Name ONE person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You suck. You are the problem with this country. Spoiled privileged brats with no morals, no manners, no sense of history. Ill-bred kids of today with no families, no positive outlook, and really no sense of grandeur. You know who RBF is? You know what he did? Naw, I doubt you'd ever even begin to understand it all.

      I bet you eat at McDonald's and live in (or aspire to live in) a McMansion. You probably think sprawl is cool and you probably watch lots of TV.

    2. Re:Name ONE person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're personally offended, Josh Crawley, aren't you? Because looking at the dome shows what good aesthetics are and you don't have much of that, do you? What's Josh Crawley's sense of style or design?

  21. Re:ROFLMAO by Technician · · Score: 3, Informative

    structure is falling apart much quicker than my presure-treated-wood ad brick home?
    Actualy that is a very valid question. A lot has been learned in building domes in the last 40 years. The biggest lesson learned is that roofing the thing to keep the water out does cause problems trapping condensation in the shell promoting decay. The shape was good. The early ventilation was poor.
    Almost all new domes now have building code requirements to have the shell ventilated to prevent condensation from building up inside the outer shell. If you built a traditional home and didn't put in eve and roof vents, they also would rot out due to condensation under the shingles in the winter. Roof ventilation is required in both types of homes. More information on dome wall cavity ventilation using a cupola can be found here; http://www.domesnorthwest.com/Explanations.htm

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  22. "Inexpensive" by po8 · · Score: 2

    I'm wondering how it could possibly cost $100K to renovate a little teeny geodesic dome like that one? I mean, it's presumably built out of inexpensive materials: where does that kind of money go on this project? Couldn't someone find a couple of college students willing to do it for $15K ea + materials over a summer? For that matter, wouldn't someone donate the materials?

  23. My friend by GigsVT · · Score: 2

    and coworker's parents has a dome house.

    I cost a lot to build, and they couldn't sell it when they put it on the real estate market.

    I've been in it several times, it's interesting. It's bigger inside than it looks on the outside. The heating/cooling does seem to always be very consistant, it seems to have less temperature variation than a normal square house.

    Someone mentioned leaks, my friend never mentioned problems with leaks, even though it has several skylights.

    He reads slashdot, but he never posts, maybe this will be his first story to post in, after all, he is pretty qualified to post on this one!

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  24. Mr. Fuller a visionary, eh? by yeOldeSkeptic · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    OK, this is a troll. But I had to get it out
    of my system. I for one am, not falling under the
    spell of this ``futuristic geodesic dome'' mantra.


    The first time I heard about Mr. Buckminster Fuller
    several years ago I was almost convinced that
    the messiah of modern architecture had at last
    walked the planet. He is a ``visionary'', a ``genius'',
    the great pooh-bah, he invented or
    discovered the geodesic dome.
    Yeah right, a sphere made up of triangles. So what?
    It's been known at least from the time of the
    ancient Egyptians that the triangle is a very
    rigid structure. Mr. Fuller applied the principle
    to the sphere and suddenly he is a genius?
    He even got a molecular configuration named
    after him. What's next?, an element named
    buckminsterfullerium?


    A post above me even claims that Mr. Fuller's
    geodesic dome led to advances in chemistry.
    Now, that is one huge leap of progress
    in the impending deification of Mr. Fuller, I say.
    Well kiddo, let me be the devil's advocate.
    Just what did Mr. Fuller come up with that
    can compare with

    • The Eiffel Tower?
    • The Empire State Building?
    • The World Trade Center Towers?
    • The Chrysler building?

    that deserves all this adulation he is
    getting?
    1. Re:Mr. Fuller a visionary, eh? by cyberlync · · Score: 1


      Like many sideline critics you assume that becuase it is a simple principle in hindsight it must have been simple to come up with. This is, of couse, blatantly wrong headed of you. The genious in these types of things is that initial spark of inventivness that causes a person to make the leap of imagination to make something that did not exist exist. By your principles, wilber and orville where lucky idiots becuase the wing is such a simple concept, or perhaps edison was truly a useless moron becuase the lightbulb is so simple, just a filiment that heats up right? There are thousands of other inventions that seem simple in hindsight but where difficult to come up with the first time. That doesnt make them useless.

      --
      I'm a programmer, I don't have to spell correctly; I just have to spell consistently
    2. Re:Mr. Fuller a visionary, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right, a sphere made up of triangles. So what? It's been known at least from the time of the ancient Egyptians that the triangle is a very rigid structure. Mr. Fuller applied the principle to the sphere and suddenly he is a genius?

      Yes. Mr. Fuller applied the principle of "the triangle as stable structure" to the sphere. And then to make the production of self-supporting geodesic domes reproducible, he worked out the mathematics to prove it. By hand.

  25. fuller didn't invent the geodesic dome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but fuller didn't invent the geodesic dome... there was a geodesic dome built in germany in 1922 for zeiss jena, to be used as a planetarium. Bucky just happened to stumble upon it and patent the idea in america. He's another one of the imperialist 'inventors' of american history, like t.a. edison... not to be trusted.

    1. Re:fuller didn't invent the geodesic dome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > He's another one of the imperialist 'inventors' > of american history, like t.a. edison... not to > be trusted.

      happy cinco de mayo, you anti-white bigot.

  26. Mummy... by j_stirk · · Score: 0

    i think we just slashdotted MS-NBC... or is it just my connection???

    --
    [root@GRIFFIN root]# rpm -e coffee-1.22.3-1a.i386.rpm
    error: removing these packages would break dependencies:
  27. Re:Hmmm....seems to be going about it the wrong wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Besides, if SIU gets a hold of it, they seem likely to let it rot, despite how much they like to tout Fuller. While I was "studying" there in the early 90s, building leaks during rainstorms were pretty common. Hopefully things have changed for the better there.

    Considering that it is on the National Historic Register, I wonder if there are some preservation societies that could get involved?

    Also, considering this Wolfram guy builds geodesic domes for fun and profit, I hope he is chipping in some of the cash, considering he might not have a career if it wasn't for Bucky!

    Even so, I guess I'll chip in some cash. It has some sentimental value to this SIU grad.

  28. Re:Hmmm....seems to be going about it the wrong wa by Sojourn7 · · Score: 1

    I'd have to agree all things considered. But not for the reason you state. And his doing so would be unfortunate at best. Since this would likely result in the demolition of the structure.

    As Susan carefully eluded to in her reply in the article SIU has no interest in purchasing this house for a number of reasons. There is no funding either for the purchase much less the maintence or restoration of the home. Additionally It is located in a residential neighborhood that is not ajoining any campus property, this in it's self causes issues.

    As a side note, SIU Does still maintain at least one dome picnic shelter. But SIU has owned several of these homes that were located on or immediatly ajoining the camus and has torn them down due to the high cost of maintence. The two most prominate ones are now a vacant lot and a small Labyrinth park(painted on the foundation of the dome).

  29. Re:ROFLMAO by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    structure is falling apart much quicker than my presure-treated-wood ad brick home?

    Obviously we should be building molecules out of brick and presure-treated-wood.

  30. Actualli I think BF'd be happier by crovira · · Score: 2

    if it was rebuilt to code. A code that onw includes
    domed constructions...

    I've volunteered for the Buckminster Fuller Institute ( http://www.bfi.org/ ) as a means of puting my money (or absence there of,) where my mouth is.

    Fuller ranks right up there with Steve Wolfram as far as I'm concerned.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  31. Oldest commercial dome still doing very well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The oldest commercially built bucky dome is a restaurant in Woods Hole MA called (what else) "The Dome Restaurant" Its been there since the 50's and it's doing very well thanks...

    http://www.thenimrod.com/domehist.htm

  32. domes revisited by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

    I think we now have the technology to make domes worthwhile again. Roofing can now be sprayed on polymer. Inexpensive, long-lasting, and absolutely leak proof. Insulation can also be sprayed on, and can look nice enough that it need not be covered. Traditional drywall is not necessary... Windows, OTHO, I know little about.

    I will definitely consider a dome as a vacation home off in the woods. 1000 acres, some solar panels, and a really tall mast for my cellphone antenna. :-)

  33. Re:ROFLMAO by drwho · · Score: 1

    Thanks...I was going to give the exact URL to explain the exact problem!

    Geodesic domes are very useful, if designed correctly. Another problem quoted is that the walls are round, while furniture tends to have flat backs. This might be a problem in a small domes, but as the diameter of the dome increases the wall will of course curve less. You shouldn't put your furniture flat against the wall anyhow, I have seen many recommendations of at least 2 inches.

    The DomesNorthWest.Com site is a good one. Read it for more info.

  34. Domes have improved a lot. - Funny story by tetranz · · Score: 1

    I took an instant liking to domes when I first saw one some years ago. I also became interested in Bucky's work.

    A few years ago I met a guy called John Rich who is a very well respected dome builder in New Zealand with a long list of successful stories and an informative site at http://www.geocities.com/geodesicsnz

    He has told a funny story relating to ventilation in a dome he built. It goes something like this:

    Building inspector arrives to do final inspection of newly built dome. All is well except that he insists that a ceiling fan be installed at the top of the dome. John argues that the natural ventilation makes this unnecessary but the inspector refuses to sign off unless this is done. Fan is reluctantly installed and the inspector is called back. He sees the fan rotating nicely and happily signs the certificate. As he is leaving, John shows him the fan's power cord, not plugged in :-)

  35. Re: Germans invented the geodesic dome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn right! ALL the great inventors, scientists and engineers were German.

    If it's not GERMAN, it's CRAP!!!

  36. Re:domes revisited with windows by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Windows has another meaining: A "window" is a piece of glass set into a wall to allow light to pass through. It can be used to look outside while remaining inside. Some windows can be opened to allow the exterior atmosphere into the interior. "She looked out the window and, seeing that it was a beautiful spring day, she opened it to get some fresh air."

  37. Wright brothers IP? by dbc001 · · Score: 1

    Actually I don't know the details but apparently the Wright brothers tried to legislate all their competitors out of business, and were in fact somewhat successful. A good friend of mine is an aviation buff and anytime we talk about IP he brings up the horrendous damage that the Wright bros did to the field of aviation by stifling all the competition.

    Although that doesnt say anything about how much effort it took them to get there, or whether or not they just stumbled on to their ideas...

    -dbc

  38. Big Bad Bucky F vs. Furious Frank Lloyd W. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a student at Southern Illinois University, it was 'Bucky' Fuller this and 'Bucky' Fuller that. Geodesic domes! Dynaxion maps! Woo woo! Then I went to school in Madison, Wisconsin, and it's Frank Lloyd Write slept here, wow, look at his chairs, they're a pain if you're over 5'4", but wow, Prairie style, bla bla bla. In fact, I think Madison had a grudge against Fuller; as they named their mascot, a Badger, 'Bucky' as well.

    If they were still alive, I'd lock them in a geodesic thunderdome and let them fight it out to the death!

  39. Interesting, but.. by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

    Are these of any practical use? You'd think they would be more popular if they actually provided a solution to some kind of problem..

    --
    .