Slashdot Mirror


Gilmore On Hardware-Restricted Content

An unnamed reader links to John Gilmore's explanation of just why it's a bad idea to let companies (Intel in particular) cave to industry demands for so-called content protection in hardware. The upshot is that if such measures really are built in, the general-purpose computer may not have long to live.

4 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Hardware Restricted Content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    An idea whose time has come. If you aren't in favor of it, then face it, you are simply a criminal. Who can argue with trying to protect hard working artists and the companies that promote them from theft?

  2. shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    internet is turnning into shit
    computers are going to turn into shit
    max headroom is going to be in a computer
    shit shit shit

  3. Re:media companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    thank you for stating the obivious, now fuck off moron.

  4. Personally... by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I hope this bill gets passed. The REAL upshot of it will be that peeps outside of the US will buy equipment from Asia & the EU (that will circumvent copy protection messures) and avoid US manufacturers altogether. And many within the US will import and still keep rippin and warezin.

    As it is the USA has garnered a lot of bad feeling interneationally since Bush came to power, and I for one am sick of the USA attempting to thrust its legislation down my throught. Dont get me wrong - America is a great country with many fine people - but your politics SUCK!!

    Go ahead, do it - see if the rest of the world gives a shit as the US economy goes into a nose dive!!