Slashdot Mirror


Government Funds Secret Sustainable Computing

SEWilco writes "OSDN's NewsForge reports that Carnegie Mellon University has started a Sustainable Computing Consortium to improve the quality and security of software. The only news release is that NASA gave CMU $23 million to help create dependable software. SCC members get an internal-use license for SCC software. So taxpayers are paying millions to create proprietary software, and companies get access for a few thousand dollars. (There is some blurring between CMU's SCC and CMU's High Dependability Computing Consortium, although HDCC's web site has been idle for a year.)"

1 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Secret? by CFN · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Dude, you are making a logical fallacy.

    If A implies B (ie. if something is secret then it is proprietary) does not mean B implies A (if it is proprietary then it is secret). It also does not mean ~A imples ~B (if it is not secret then it is not proprietary).

    Secrecy has nothing to do with proprietaryness: the whole point of the patent system is to have proprietary techniques open for all to read.