RMS Replies to "The Stallman Factor"
Ryan Amos writes "RMS has replied to the article "The Stallman Factor," as
posted on Slashdot about a week ago. In specific, his replies deal with the University of Texas SIGLinux naming fiasco and Bitkeeper. As always with RMS, an interesting read."
Moderator abuse galore... How the hell is this offtopic?
Anyway, it seems to me it's the same thing as Gates not giving a speech at a hypothetical internet user group, because it's not called MS-Internet.
(Hey, IE is the predominant tool for accessing the internet, so he could claim that "by convention", whatever that means, it should be MS-Internet)
Stallman is doing more damage than good with this pathetic ego trip of his.
Sorry to drag MS into this flaimbait-ridden discussion, but it was the first example that sprang to mind.
Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
Throughout the article, though he at times (mainly at the beginning of the article) uses GNU/Linux, RMS refers to GNU/Linux as Linux on numerous occassions.
How can we consider his argument if he, himself, does not actively practice what he preaches?
"There ought to be limits to freedom"