Intel Itanium 2 Benchmarks
Pablo writes "Over at VR-Zone we saw some
interesting benchmarks of the upcoming Intel Itanium 2 processor codenamed
McKinley that is on schedule to be launched during second half of this year.
With a faster 3MB on-die L3 cache, 6 instructions/cycle and 6.4GB/s of
bandwidth, it is poised to perform at 1.5-2x of the current Itanium processor.
There is an overview of how the Intel Itanium 2 at 1Ghz clock frequency will
perform against the current Itanium 800Mhz and Sun's Ultra Sparc III RISC
processor."
There is no spoon.
monkey piss i tells ya!
The time you thought you needed to be Kreskin to predict BSD is dying, is over.
Why? I'll tell you why. It's no secret. BSD is dying. Yes, that's right,
BSD is dying and netcratf confirms it.
The estimated number of BSD users is 100 and that is consitent with the
number of usenet postings. BSD was a plot to divide the open source movement
and now it is dead.
Microsoft is next.
The flamewarrior
[...]
Mod Me down Please
So, you worked out that asking to be modded down has a magical modding-up effect humm?
Mod me down please.
Read further up the chain a bit, I did, you just have to click on the message to see it.
As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.
Are you kidding, if you put your coffee cup on it, your coffee will boil out in a couple of minutes and the cup will crack soon after that!!!
So, cheers to you for picking up on that and risking a Flamebait to point it out (well, one of the bullshit indicators I dropped in anyway).
Sorry, folks, but you've all been had. Outside of the kick I've gotten from thinking about how somebody's going to try impressing others with his knowledge of the 'die-control' mechanism, I actually had a slightly larger purpose for dropping a post like this in the next generic 'faster CPU' story that came up.
I've often seen accounts that claim to either be from a particular company or to have the inside scoop rocket up in score quicker than comments that, well, actually contain something tangible. Lately, I've questioned how pure something like Slashdot (or really any partially-community-run online forum) would be from P.R. lackeys either FUDing a story or pumping a product they're planning to promote. So, I figured, the best way to test the waters for susceptibility to these scenarios is to post a comment that can obviously be proven to be factually incorrect in a couple of spots with Google and see how quickly it gets torn apart.
People, the mods failed miserably. The comment not only survived, but it almost hit the highest rating by reaching +4. Oh, I'm sure it'll be modbombed NOW when there's absolutely no benefit and it'll take the points away that could be spent promoting a decent comment in a different thread, but it's too late for the mods to prove that this will not become (continue to be) an effective karma whoring and perception management technique for weeks to come. So surround yourself with a healthy bit of skepticism, drop your comment threshold to -1, and take everything you read on here with a huge grain of salt, because it seems that community moderation of content quality is only a winning situation when the community on the whole is brighter than you.