Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Red Hat Makes Patent Promise

Posted by michael on from the cross-our-heart dept.

colonel writes "In a followup to an earlier story about Red Hat filing for software patents, a "promise" has appeared on RedHat's website stating that they do not intend to pursue patents against software licensed under a specific set of licenses. It's not binding in perpetuity, and some licenses are notably absent in the list of approved licences, like the LGPL. But, at least Red Hat's made their intentions clear now."

2 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Rhetoric to appease the zealots. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Folks, redhat has been caught with it's pants down and condom on. Whatever their original intent, RH is now primarily driven by bottom line. Some may call this greed--others may call it reasonable business. One thing is clear--RH continues (desperately) to need the support of the slashdot-sympathetic because that's the seeds of its major asset--name and brand spread.

    So ask yourself--are the apologetics that RH has produced honest in the sense that RH continues to be the torchbearer for Linux and the spirit of free software? Or is it just a ploy to try to keep as many of you as possible from defecting? Are you fundamentally for Linux or are you fundamentally for the idea of free as in speech software?

    (the second question is not rhetorical--the answer shold not be linux.)

  2. Time for a PATENTS version of the GPL? by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    Hmm ... I'd say the most interesting part of the policy is this:

    At the same time, we are forced to live in the world as it is, and that world currently permits software patents. A relatively small number of very large companies have amassed large numbers of software patents. ...

    One defense against such misuse is to develop a corresponding portfolio of software patents for defensive purposes. .... In the interests of our company and in an attempt to protect and promote the open source community, Red Hat has elected to adopt this same stance. We do so reluctantly because of the perceived inconsistency with our stance against software patents; however, prudence dictates this position.

    The idea is very similar to the GPL. Maybe we need a general "patent GPL" - one which is not a "policy", which can be changed later, but a stronger assignment of patent rights to a GPL'ish foundation in defense.

    Maybe it's time to revive the League for Programming Freedom, but along these lines.

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)