SACD-CD Hybrids -- A Way Out For Us Both?
"An interesting feature of the SACD layer is plenty of room for strong digital rights management code.
Here's my proposal: it should should allow artists to get paid, and the citizens to have archived and portable copies of the recording they have purchased. The record companies should produce a superior audio product and get to protect it from serial copying. The CD layer should be freely available for personal copying such as to a computer or portable digital player. These 2 basic concepts are a model that can be applied in the future, when better formats become available. It may also serve as a model for digital visual recordings. Perhaps we can get the artists, publishing companies, electronics manufacturers and the federal trade commision to all agree on this compromise: 1.The high quality recording allows only one copy of itself to be made for archival purposes. 2.The lower quality recordings are available for personal copying.
Personal digital technology has brought a tremendous change to the realtionship between media publishers & consumers. It's time for a new paridigm that will re-define that relationship for modern times."
Stupid anal audiophiles. Can't you just play music as a background task in your mind? I mean I play my small collection of mp3s [around 3k] all the time, kinda like the radio. I don't really pay much attention to the songs let alone how much gibbs phenonemon I can hear...
For the record, stop whining. Get a life. Or at least learn how to use a decent MP3 codec then stop whining.
At 192kbps most MP3s [re: all I've heard] sound just like the CD on my amplified computer speakers [altec lansing 60w system, sounds cool]. Sure definately if you spend the 150k on a sound studio you can buy a 50$ SACD. For the 99% of the rest of us we will either ignore CD's or just buy cheaper ones.
Tom
Someday, I'll have a real sig.