RMS Condemns "UnitedLinux" per-seat License
dep writes "Likening the practice to Windows, Richard M. Stallman has issued a brief statement condemning the per-seat licensing that it appears will be employed in the "UnitedLinux" core distribution. He calls upon developers to refuse to allow their work to be used by such a distribution."
Nothing burns my ass more than hypocrisy (ok, maybe a flame about 4 feet high, but I digress...)
"Software should be free". Unless, of course, you employ that free software, and make your own choices about how it generates revenue.
As a disclaimer, I won't be using UnitedLinux. I'm quite happy with my little purple dragon distro. And in point of fact, I happen to think that per-seat licensing is a bad idea for a distro.
But hey, I'm not the one putting it together, so, it's not my call...
where is the "I feel for ya, but that's some funny ass shit" moderation?
nobody likes the title GNU/Linux, nor uses it, but RMS remains so unneccessarily fanatical about wanting people to call it "GNU/Linux" that it warrants mocking him and making fun of him. Sure he's good for the overall cause, but prepending "GNU/" to everything is just plain silly.
And you know this because you are a close personal friend of RMS? ;)
I'm not well versed in the RMS saga, but it seems to me that the man is Socialist to the core. All software is to be owned by the people? I'm hearing echos of Lenin ( who was Communist, but one begats the other).
How dare you judge him for judging RMS! What gives you the right to judge other people's ability to judge the public activities of RMS? This is an incredibly childish argument commonly heard on daytime trash talk TV shows. I am now waiting for the classic, "I know you are but what am I?", comeback.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
Reading the article impedes Karma.
Finally RMS shows his true colours. The UnitedLinux companies have guaranteed gratis access to the source code, which means free speech is satisfied. But despite RMS's continual statements that "its okay to sell GNU software", when it comes down to it, he's going to throw a frothy is your are giving it awat, gratis.
So much for free speech. RMS cares more about beer.
i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
In other news, "Likening the practice to distributing peace, Slashdot user idonotexist has issued a brief statement supporting the deployment of the "UnitedLinux" core distribution. He calls upon developers to allow their work to be used by such a distribution."
In other words, wtf cares what his opinion is?
"There ought to be limits to freedom"
Precisely. Some RMS's long diatribes about "free speech and not free beer" being the intention of the GPL are actually bullshit. He has actively prevented (through the GPL) there being the possibility of free speech without free beer.
i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
Please put down your mouse and move to a country where respect for the law is not a core value.
No one here will miss you.