Where UnitedLinux Got It Wrong
An Anonymous Coward writes "A story on NewsForge [ed. note: part of the keiretsu] suggests that the lack of binaries
for UnitedLinux shows disrespect to the community which created most of the software. The author suggests
a better way for handling the business problems that
a lack of binaries is supposed to solve. Some particularly clueless
reader comments say that UnitedLinux has no responsibility
to cooperate with the community. The thought that
UnitedLinux won't even offer a development distribution
to the community does not sit well with me."
Gee, big surprise?
Christ, I wish money never would have gotten tangled with linux. And no, I don't give a shit what paid people have contributed.
Hint: if you disagree with me and reply, your message will be deleted. Don't waste your time, son.
-- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
M$ would never do such a thing!!! Losnix must DIE!!!!! BSD is for commie macaroons!!!!
Shut up you ignorant fag!
*hugs*
much public scorn. You think the public give a flying fuck about the politics of the Gnu Pubic License?
Lindows : rip-off of Windows
WineX : rip-off of DirectX
Mozilla : rip-off of Internet Explorer
Apache : rip-off of IIS.
Without Microsoft, OSS would be nothing