Slashdot Mirror


Napster files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Joey Patterson writes "CNN Money reports that Napster has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy." Thank god the industry shut them down... now that piracy has been stopped they can all sleep much better.

10 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. Chapter 11 is for protection of their assets by Fly · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The Chapter 11 filing was part of the deal to sell to BMG. It protects Napster from its creditors since I presume BMG didn't want to buy Napster only to have people taking pieces of it while they work towards a transition.

    If you recall, K-Mart has also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy to protect them from their creditors while they attemp to reorganize into a profitable company.

    Filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy does not mean that the company is gone or is no longer operating. In the case of Napster, the great levels of piracy ended long before today.

    --
    end of line
  2. Re:soooo.... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 5, Funny
    Really??

    I thought KaZaa just gave you viruses(virii??) and adware?

    Had I known you could get sheep...

  3. Re:It's just a vehicle for theft by WebWiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a songwriter, and I considered Napster to be a really great vehicle to get my music to others that would normally not get the opportunity hear it. I own my music, and I wanted to give it away free. That is my right. Are you telling me that this argument doesn't matter? Also, Napster didn't break "a law". There were no laws governing P2P file sharing technology. The people using Napster and downloading copyrighted material that they DIDN'T ALREADY OWN were the ones breaking the laws. Not the company itself....if I use my Jeep Wrangler as a getaway car in a robbery maybe we should sue Jeep for "Breaking Laws" and giving me the opportunity to commit a crime. Those Vehicle Making Bastards.

  4. Re:A Business Failure; Not a Technological One by gabec · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I just wanted to note that this is not the death of Napster, it's simply that it's the planned way for Napster to shirk its debts before they're officially bought up by Bertelsmann... or that's what I got out of this ZDNet article.

    " Bertelsmann stepped in on May 17 with $8 million to buy Napster's assets. As part of that agreement, Napster was to voluntarily seek bankruptcy protection and emerge as a wholly owned unit of Europe's second-largest media group. "

  5. Re:The Music Industry has Lost by Ooblek · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ith the Recent court ruling in the netherlands that Kazaa cannot be held reponsible for the actions of it's users, the Music industry has lost.

    Don't count on that. They still have more money and time to throw at the problem. My guess is that they will do so, at whatever level it takes. They are a big part of the US economy, so I would guess there will be some sort of political pressure through treaties or something.

    For now, though, the seas are open and there is loot to be reaped.....er, music to be downloaded.

  6. Are you insane? by Gorbie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you are comparing music theft with Jesus' acts, the boston tea party, and the freedon of slaves?

    Thanks for making my point. You really did just fall off the turnip truck.

  7. lame slashdot editor's comment by astrashe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whatever you think about Napster, the editor's comment on this story is lame.

    Putting a murderer in jail doesn't put a stop to all murders. Does that mean it's a waste of time?

    We're blowing this argument, and when we lose, everyone's going to blame the record companies, but it's going to be our own fault.

    Defending stealing is wrong, and as much as everyone likes free stuff, it's just not possible that the "stealing is ok" argument is going to fly in the courts and in congress over the long run.

    The other lame argument that people make is that "the record companies would be better off if they allowed sharing." Maybe. Probably not. But the point is that it's their property, and they get to decide what to do with it.

    There are two issues on the table. The one that everyone talks about is piracy. There's no way to win this in the law, although technology will probably make it possible to steal music and share it over the net for the foreseeable future.

    The other one, and the one that is winnable, is about whether or not there will be open electronic distribution systems. Right now entertainment companies control distribution, and that's how they make their money.

    Movie studios make money by controlling access to the multiplexes -- indpendent films have to make "distribution" deals if they want to be seen. And if you want your CD in the Virgin Megastore, you've got to cut a deal with a big label. That's the toll booth.

    The entertainment companies are using the piracy issue to cover up their other agenda, which is to avoid open distribution at all costs.

    And their biggest allies aren't corrupt senators, they're whiny assholes with a sense of entitlement, sitting on their asses, believing that the world owes them free eminem records.

    The arguments for stealing marginalizes the people who make it. It marginalizes the public's interest. It's suicidal politically and morally bankrupt.

    Take my karma. I don't care.

  8. Libraries completely killed the book publishers... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Insightful


    "Thank god the industry shut them down... now that piracy has been stopped they can all sleep much better."

    Remember what happened when Carnegie endowed thousands of libraries across the United States? Well, people could then get their books free! And the obvious thing happened: The book publishing industry never sold another book, except to libraries.

    Not!

    Then there was that second socially destructive technological advance, TV. Once people could get their entertainment at home, and without paying extra, the movie industry almost completely disappeared, except for sales to TV broadcasters.

    Not!

    Well, the movie industry was already dead, of course, but another technological advance, the VCR, killed it again. When people found that they could record perfectly good movies on video tape, they stopped paying for movies! It was completely logical and understandable that this would happen.

    Not!

    The fact is, no one completely understands the issues surrounding intellectual property. We can't write a good law if we don't understand. Someone must sit down and do the thinking, and the thinking hasn't been finished.

    The music industry is so abusive that I tend to stay away from music. I find that, when I have access to free music (tapes and CDs from the library), I become interested in a particular type of music and buy more, not less. Maybe there are a lot of people like me, because, during the height of Napster, the U.S. music industry had its best year.

  9. Re:So? by Spunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    he'd probably sell a few hundred thousand copies.

    Or in an ironic twist, he'd sell one copy which would then be downloaded 100,000 times.

  10. Re:Napster gone finally... by morgajel · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been trying to find blues travelers cover of johnny b. goode for 3 years now. the only place I've EVER found it was on napster. it was from a tape someone made at a concert. imagine john popper soloing on that song with his harp going at 3 times the normal tempo.

    I'd gladly PAY for that song, however I've yet to find a place that sells it, including www.bluestraveler.com
    Napster served one purpose and one purpose ALONE for me- rare bootlegs of songs the bands never put on cd. Oh, that and john mayer

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.