Security Through Obsolescence
dlur writes "This article and this article (both variations of the same article written by roblimo) delve past security through obscurity, into using old, out of date software to secure a site. Maybe it's not always in your best interest to snag the latest kernel? Perhaps think twice before jumping at the chance to buy MS's latest OS."
No one can break into my house because I have a moat and a drawbridge, and a dragon behind the door. Old, but effective.
Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
Time to move my mp3 collection over to a gopher server :)
--
Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
We ship DOS based and Windows based medical data collection software out of our shop, and we've had WAY fewer problems (one, to be exact, compared with over a dozen) with people hacking into our DOS stuff vs our Windows stuff, despite the fact that we have 50 times more DOS units in the field than Windows.
Not to mention that the laptops we ship the DOS software on gets stolen a lot less frequently, since our DOS software will run on 286s...
Denver Isuzu Suzuki
No one can steal my data!
I have no network. My backups are stored on 5 1/4" floppies.
Not only can no one read these things, they'd need a truck convoy to haul them away. No way in hell they're sneaking past security with a motherfucking semi truck!
You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
I remember researching firewall products and stumbled across one that ran on MS-DOS. According to the marketing hype, MS-DOS was the OS of choice
:-)
Cool... just what everyone needs... a single-user, single-tasking firewall.
Why not call it a brick-wall?