Slashdot Mirror


SDSU Students Create Sporty Hybrid Vehicle

Nevyan writes "SDSU Engineering students working in conjunction with real life designers create an electric hybrid vehicle that actually...well.. looks cool for all the right reasons. Participant in the Tour de Sol. I happened to see this vehicle on campus at SDSU and I want to buy one so badly." Njaneer.com has more information and photos - here's one to give you an idea of the size.

10 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. SDSU != South Dakota State University by DaHat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just a warning to all of my fellow South Dakota residence... in this case SDSU is not South Dakota State University in Brookings South Dakota, but sadly is in fact San Diego State University... blast those Californians taking all of our acronyms... in this world if you say SF or SD people think you mean San Francisco or San Diego... when will the world learn that they mean Sioux Falls and South Dakota instead! The FAA and Post Office agree with me... when will the rest of you?

    1. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The FAA... agree with me

      I work for the Fresno Academic Administration and I can assure you that we do not!

  2. Re:The irony by Xoro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also sad: Proof that a cool car doesn't make you look any less geeky...

    --
    Kill, Tux, kill!
  3. Re:YES!! Finally!! by RAzaRazor · · Score: 4, Funny
    Yeah, it looks cool so you can pick up the chicks.

    But with no back seat, how are you supposed to get laid???

  4. This is excellent by edo-01 · · Score: 3, Funny
    I have long suspected (half jokingly), as I am sure have many here, that the big car companies who have developed hybrid/alternate energy cars have deliberately made them look incredibly ugly to prevent anyone actually wanting to buy one.

    It's great to see one of these cars that actually looks cool, even if the models posing with the car don't.

  5. Drunk...cannot make sense of post...head hurting.. by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I've been saying this among friends for a while... the only reason that these early electric and hybrid cars all look like ass! "

    Arrrrggggghhh!!! Finish the sentence! What is this supposed to mean?

    -Tyler

    Vacuums really make my blood boil.

    --
    Happy people make bad consumers.
  6. Doors? by jcsehak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are those doors or drive-in-movie trays? What is that, like 3 less inches you have to step over to get out? I say save money on hinges and go dukes of hazzard style.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  7. Then there's North Dakota... by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Funny

    Which is smaller and has fewer residents than South Dakota... home of (you guessed it) wheat, barley, durum, sunflowers, and canola. 36 B-52's, some air refueling tankers, 150 Minuteman ICBMs.

    My roommate's from there... I quote "North Dakota? Heh... not much going on there. Heck, the largest city in North Dakota is less than half the size of Lubbock, Texas".

  8. Re:YES!! Finally!! by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    Well, consider it a car of compromise.

    This vehicle is a hybrid, meaning that they couldn't go electric all the way.

    And since it only has two seats, you too get to experience the "Art of Compromise", and you too can't "go" all the way.

    Like a heroin addict gone to methadone instead of quitting cold turkey. Like a red meat eater only eating chicken and fish instead of going vegan. Like a virgin, touched for the very first time....

    No wait... that's right.. You don't get laid. All you get is Road Head. Behold the art of compromise!

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  9. Re:Great cars and can tell the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    You have confused future with past. Predicting the future is about knowing things that will happen after now, in the direction we're going. Knowing the past (the direction we're coming from) is less impressive.

    Let me help clear up this future vs past thing, since it can be confusing.

    When you posted that, my reply post was the future. You probably didn't know that I was going to condescendingly flame you. If you did know, that would be predicting the future.

    When I posted this condescending flame, your post was in the past. I didn't "predict" that you would say something stupid in the future; I was looking into the past, which is easier.

    Hope this helps.