Slashdot Mirror


Linux at Industrial Light and Magic

Nicholas DePetrillo writes "Linux Journal has a big story about how LINUX is being used in hollywood, specificly at Industrial Light and Magic with some GREAT screenshots and a very descriptive article with configuration details." Word has it that their rendering farms have gotten even bigger since this article was published.

5 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Graphics are great by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Action is great!

    Music isn't bad!

    Acting is pathetic.

    No amount of eye candy will ever make the prequels worth watching as standalone movies.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  2. Support Linux Journal by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember everybody, if you like the article then please buy the magazine! The articles, while provided free of charge, do not magically appear.

    If you want more great articles like this, support Linux Journal. I know the idea of paying for something might go against some people's sensibilities (information wants to be FREEEEEEE!!! and such), but remember that in real life people need to eat. Please don't let the fine people at Linux Journal starve. Buy a magazine.

    Please. Do it for the authors.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  3. Re:Great News by handsomepete · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What would happen to the gaming world at large if Sony was to start developing games for Linux?

    If I had to guess, nothing major would happen except there'd be a few more games for Linux and there'd be a lot of articles about it on Linux Games.

    Would developers support Sony?

    Probably, but it depends on what you mean by developers. Hardware (read as video and sound card) developers may try and throw Linux gamers a bone in the driver arena (but it'll be a small, closed source one). Since nvidia already does this and most (if not all) Linux gamers opt for their cards because of it, impact would be minimal. Software developers could care less about what Sony does in the software market. It would probably go down as follows:
    1.) Sony develops games for Linux.
    2.) Other developers develop games for Linux thinking that Sony had some special information.
    3.) Sales aren't immediately stellar, other developers back out and snicker behind Sony's back thinking that they're superior.

    Would Linux gaming become a very viable option?

    IMHO, and don't take this as a flame because I'm a supporter and user of Linux, but I don't think it'll be really great until a brand new/standarized API (a la direct X - so shoot me) is developed (or a current one is seriously overhauled). There's something to be said in an all-in-one multimedia package that doesn't depend on a bunch of other things. Or until there's a working alternative to X which will never happen. *shrug* I'm probably wrong, but that's just my 2 cents.

  4. CBDTPA .... Linux ... the irony... by einTier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who thinks it's rather odd that movie companies are pursuing a law that would effectively outlaw Linux -- while that's the operating system running most of their kick-ass render farms?

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  5. A fallacious argument, yet again by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you watch movies by any chance? Or TV? If so, then shut up, because you're helping to fund these guys...

    This fallacy has been rebutted numerous times.

    The long and short of it is: just because circumstances constrain you to operate within particular boundries, doesn't mean you are in any way wrong or hypocritical in criticizing those boundries, or anything unjust or wrong you find within those boundries. Many of the folk, black and white alike, who criticized apartheid in the United States and South Africa still paid taxes to those governments, watched the television and listened to the radio put out by those governments (or the private corporations profiting from those apartheid systems). Those who advocated communism or socialism still had jobs within those systems, and bought their food, clothing, and housing within those very same systems they so disapproved of. This did not in any way make their criticisms less valid, or make them hyporcrits for having the courage and moxy to stand up and criticize those systems. Quite the contrary.

    Indeed, had reformers throughout history been required to operate within the parameters your troll implies ('you cannot legitimately criticize anything that is a part of your lifestyle!') we would be living no differently from people a thousand years ago. In other words, no reform would have been possible, because no criticism would have been possible.

    I suspect that, were someone who doesn't watch television or movies to criticize the Hollywood Copyright and Media Cartels, you would be the first to say something to the effect of "That's easy for you to say, you don't use their product anyway!" which is, of course, the flipside of the very same logical fallacy you've indulged in here.

    So it is you, not the person you responded to, who really ought to shut up.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy