Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Icons for Mac OS X

Jeff Stys writes "Xicons.com has launched a new Open Source section of its website. The idea is to aid the Open Source software community by providing high-quality sets of toolbar icons and other user interface graphics for their Open Source programs." Many of them are very nice, indeed, and are specifically geared for use in Mac OS X.

37 comments

  1. Reading between the lines by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    We are currently soliciting toolbar and other interface icons from the design community. This will enable developers to concentrate on making great software by offloading the creation of interface elements to skilled artists.

    Or...

    We are fed up with the amateur hour entertainment provided by the Gnome and KDE crews. We've taken it upon ourselves to gather up all the crap out there and find those few nuggets of gold buried within lumps of clay.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  2. All I need by watchmaker1 · · Score: 1

    Is a way to edit OSX .icns files in Gimp. Or at least convert them to PNG. There are some spectacular icons for those of us who run KDE or Gnome. I currently use several icons from xicons on my KDE3 desktop, unfortunately, to get them I had to grab OSX screenshots and cookie-cutter them out.

    1. Re:All I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately, the $#%$#( at apple use a proprietary format that is protected by patent to store their icons, so it won't ever happen :(

      You could ask the icon developers to deliver them in png format though

    2. Re:All I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you open the *.icns files in Preview, select File/Save As, and press enter you'll have a TIFF whith the same name as the original file. You could probably write an applescript to simplyfy the process if you have a lot of files.

    3. Re:All I need by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Iconographer (there's a link to it at xicons.com) will allow you to export Mac OS X's .icns files to several other formats including Photoshop and I believe PNG.

      --

      mbbac

    4. Re:All I need by mbbac · · Score: 1

      You are a tool.

      It has already happened: Iconographer.

      --

      mbbac

  3. I can't look by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2
    Those flashing "IF THIS GIF IS FLASHING (WHICH OF COURSE THERE'S NO REASON IT WOULDN'T) THEN YOU ARE A WINNER" banner ads drove me away within seconds.

    Do site owners not consider the effects of the advertising on their image and usability?

    1. Re:I can't look by byjove · · Score: 1

      Ditto. You'd think the site would have some advertising guidelines like: Don't do anything that loses customers.

    2. Re:I can't look by austad · · Score: 2

      Wow, I have a headache from just reading the front page and seeing those damn flashing banners. You can bet your sweet ass I won't be going back to that site anytime soon.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    3. Re:I can't look by Voline · · Score: 1

      I've been to that site numerous times and never been bothered by the ads. Thanks to iCab's excellent ad-filtering feature, I've never seen them.

  4. i think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    we should get some elfs and give them some crack and have them try and come up with something, i bet itll look like XP.

    you can always tell who the good mac develpoers are because they have an attention to detail about things like icons, most others dont. if you dont believe me look at some of the skins that are out for winamp. i hope these same "designers" do not contribute to the opensource icon collection.

  5. I think that's a great idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. because very often OpenSource Software is much more powerfull than any other (e.g. Mozilla[I don't agree but many n00bs told me so ;)]) but the interface is **** or it just doesn't look nice,..
    this might help...

  6. same deal here by jjshoe · · Score: 1

    i did a quick look for icons but didnt find any, when they're drop down box failed i'd had enough of the flashing banners, its to bad that they're site will probly fail because of this

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    1. Re:same deal here by mbbac · · Score: 1

      The icons for Open Source aren't there yet, because there aren't any yet. However, if you want to see some samples of what current icon artists are doing all you have to do is *gasp* go to the frontpage of the site.

      --

      mbbac

  7. Re:I can't look (OT) by belbo · · Score: 1

    Use privoxy

    http://www.privoxy.org/

    Works great in MOX (and Linux and Windows and ...) and is easy to configure (i.e. requires no configuration for about 95% of all sites) via a slick browser based interface.

    b.

    --

    --
    "Just believe everything I tell you, and it will all be very, very simple."

  8. Emacs gnu by psxndc · · Score: 2
    I think the Emacs Gnu is great looking. It fits right in with the rest of the apps in the dock. It's good to see others want this kind of quality in even the little things like icons.

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:Emacs gnu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, and only 16 MB (compressed) for a (dynamically linked) text editor. And people accuse MS of bloat.

    2. Re:Emacs gnu by psxndc · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      *sigh* Why do I bother?

      Is Emacs bloated? Yes. Do I use it for 75% of the things it can do? No. Can I use one text editor on every OS I work on easily and productively? Yes, and that's why I use it when I do.

      Though this isn't justifying bloat in any sense, we're in the days where a 60 gig drive is standard on a machine. Isn't a 50 MB functional text editor just as good if not better than a less functional 830K text editor back in the days of 1 gig drives? They take up the same space ratio wise. It's 50 megs. That is nothing compared to most drives today, or even most programs. Geez, Diablo II takes up a gig and a half!

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    3. Re:Emacs gnu by Molz · · Score: 1

      Not at my OS X box right now, but what is diffrent about that download from the one that comes with the OS? Does it have the Quartz patch to allow it to operate outside the terminal?

      --
      Can I Play With Madness?
    4. Re:Emacs gnu by marktwain · · Score: 1

      Good comment. It reminds me of all the stuff said about Office, but there's a difference. Plug-ins. With Office it's all in your face. You can cut a piece out here and there and customize it and blah blah, but EMACs (hmmm...think it took Stuffit Expander longer to unpack it than it did to download it :)...isn't as bloated from the get go. The user controls what plug-ins and features are added. Freakin' Office. :( (And I looked all over that Xicons site, which does have some cool icons, and all I found are the Mozilla icons...nice...so I can't figure out what everyone is talking about. There's info on the "new initiative but the GNU/Linxe icons must be buried with all that other stuff).

    5. Re:Emacs gnu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Load Office XP, moron. It's H U G E and doesn't do a tenth of what Gnu Emacs does. And the M$ crapware shuts itself off after a certain number of uses (I've seen it go at 50). Maybe the Mac version is better, but it definitely does this on Windows, the crappiest OS in the known universe.

      Nice work trolling, paid MS shill. Your mom must be proud that you grew up to be a weak smelly little Slashdot troll instead of following a constructive career path or having a steady monogamous relationship without screwing it up like you always do. You suck, btw. Your family and friends are right.

      Mister Perfect

    6. Re:Emacs gnu by psxndc · · Score: 1
      It is completely a stand alone app. It doesn't need the terminal at all. Just click the gnu and emacs opens up. As with all things mac, "it just works".

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    7. Re:Emacs gnu by Zaaf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it works here too.

      But I got one issue with it and that is that I cannot compile from within emacs and use C-x ` to go to take me to the line in error.
      It seems to me that all processes run from within emacs don't get to an end.
      If you know a work around, then that'll be great!

      --

      ---
      "Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a sick mind." (Terry Pratchett)
  9. Re:I can't look (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Works great in MOX (and Linux and Windows and ...)

    From the context, I am assuming "MOX" is supposed to mean "Mac OS X". I've seen "OS/X" and "Mac X" and "System X.1" and such... but none of them are as wrong and hard to understand as "MOX".

    Just write OSX-- same number of keystrokes if that's your concern.
  10. off topic, but has to be said by GutBomb · · Score: 2

    People that run web sites do not normally create or even choose the banners they have on the pages. they aspply to be members of "ad networks", companies that have a pool of ads that you can display on your site (you do not choose. it serves up the ones it wants to show). In turn the webmaster gets paid by the click/impression... The webmaster has 2 choices. Run the annoying ads, or pay for hosting out of his pocket instead of having his ad-money pay for it.

    Is it too much to simply resize the window a bit (if you have to) and scroll down a bit? jeez. And if you get a headache from a tiny banner, you should see a doctor about it, not bitch about it on slashdot.

  11. Question: by funkhauser · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Somewhat on topic: Is there a linux program to decompress these .sit.hqx files?

    Pretty icons... but where's the PNG? Ugh. If they're so supportive of Open Source, why do they make it so difficult to use these icons in Linux? Pfft.

    1. Re:Question: by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Ugh, if you're so into Open Source you wouldn't be whining because every little thing wasn't done for you already!

      The site caters to Mac users. Therefore, the Open Source icons cater to Open Source Mac developers.

      If you want to use them with something else find a program to extract the images!

      --

      mbbac

    2. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The site caters to Mac users. Therefore, the Open Source icons cater to Open Source Mac developers. If you want to use them with something else find a program to extract the images!"

      The icon deigners seem to be interested in Free Software, probably because they can now use most of it, and probably do so. But FS is not about taking; it's about giving. If they would understand that, they would offer their FS related designs with source, in open format alternatives such as PNG, and under copyleft licenses.

    3. Re:Question: by mbbac · · Score: 1

      You must've also missed the fact that they're asking submissions be submitted in .icns and .tiff formats.

      But that's beside the fact. They're mainly interested in people porting free software to the Mac and beautifying some of the horrible designs along the way. Therefore, they don't need to supply the icons in PNG since they'll be used as .icns anyway.

      --

      mbbac

  12. Open Source? by Theom · · Score: 0

    And where would that source be hidden?

    --

    mp3: l33t term for empty.
    1. Re:Open Source? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      My thoughts exactly. "Open Source" has become hideously misused on one of the very places where it should be properly used -- Slashdot.

      "Open Source" could reasonably be used to refer to an image, I suppose, if it was in some sort of format that also stored a fully log of everything done to produce the image. Newer versions of Photoshop, for example, do this. A simple .png does not cut it.

      "Free Media" makes more sense than "Open Media".

      If it isn't about making the blueprints openly available, then it isn't "open source".

    2. Re:Open Source? by Theom · · Score: 0

      A GIMP script that creates the image would be Overy cool, or at least a description how the image was made. But there isn't even a simple PNG version, at least I didn't found one...

      --

      mp3: l33t term for empty.
  13. OK, I'm a total idiot by ellem · · Score: 2

    How do I change my Icons in OS X?

    I have been clicking Show Info of the ico I want then Edit->Copy

    Then I got to the program I wan the copied Icon to represent.

    I click Show Info, and several variations of Paste.

    It never works.

    Help me.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:OK, I'm a total idiot by mbbac · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it doesn't paste in there it is because of a bug. The next time you reboot the icon should have been replaced.

      I only have this happen with a very few files.

      --

      mbbac

  14. Re:Question: [*not* OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "If they're so supportive of Open Source, why do they make it so difficult to use these icons in Linux?"

    Exactly. Because they are not supportive of OS/FS. Sure, they take the software and use it, but they aren't (yet?) willing to give back by using open formats, and copyleft licenses.

  15. ASS/FS, open formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [about: http://xicons.macnn.com/opensource.php ]

    Hi,

    Since Mac OS X, Mac users can and do enjoy all the offerings of the OSS and FS world.

    But this FS community is not based on taking, but on giving.

    The community of Mac users should realize that there is no such thing as free lunch, and start to give back to the FS community.

    One part of that process should be to offer designs in non-proprietary format, under copyleft licenses [1], especially if those designs are OSS/FS related, which indicates that the designers themselves enjoy the offerings of the OSS/FS community.

    Please encourage the designers of Mac OS X Open ource icons on your site to provide the source with the icons (.ps etc), to provide the images in PNG, and to evaluate and use copyleft licenses for the icons.

    The icon artists themselves seem to be interested in Free Software, probably because they can now use most of it, and probably do so. But FS is not about taking; it's about giving. If they would understand that, they would offer their FS related designs with source, in open non-proprietary format alternatives such as PNG, and under copyleft licenses. This also would enable users on other OSes such as Linux to use these FS icons.

    I'm highly interested in your views, and I'm looking forward to your reply.

    Tobi

    [1] http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html

    1. Re:ASS/FS, open formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ouch;
      -ASS
      +OSS