Slashdot Mirror
Internet Routes Around South African Gov't
Mister B writes: "In an end-run around the South African government's plans to seize control of the .za domain, administrator Mike Lawrie took pre-emptive action and moved the primary .za zone file offshore. Revealing their naivete, parliamentary committee chairman Nkenke Kekana accused him of destabilising the net! Then again, the opposition think he's a hero. :-) More details on MSNBC."
Outsmarting anyone from South Africa for your own gain shouldn't be that difficult. It's the country where the "Rape babies to cure AIDS" plan came from.
Good to see the bureaucrats find out that they don't own the Internet. This is going to be interesting to watch as it continues to develop.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
amazing that I was modded a Troll
I WAS SERIOUS!!!!
http://Lenny.com
If the government wants control so bad why don't they do what they normally would do and just kill the guy?
:-D
2. which consists of some 200 lines of code
3. apparently in the public domain and quite easily available
4. but currently controlled by an unpaid SA individual, Mike Lawrie,
5. who was authorized by ICANN to administer said domain,
6. who now wants to quit but refuses to hand it over without following ICANN's rules,
7. which expressly require the SA governments blessing on any transfer,
6. and this individual has maliciously "moved" this code "offshore" to protect it from the SA government.
SO fine, somebody copy the 200 lines of code and email them to everybody in the SA government. I mean, really, what does the 200 lines of code have to do with it?
It's the authority to assign names which is important, not a miniscule file containing the current structure, and the only entity which can assign that authority within the current structure is ICANN.
If the SA government want to actually "control" names with South Africa then they would have to "control" the DNS servers, of which they have none at the moment. I'm sure a dozen people have pointed out by now that if they really want to they can set up a DNS of their own, and if they convince their citizens to use that one then they "control" not only the .za domain but the entire world!
If, on the other hand, they want to play with ICANN's bat and ball and backyard, they're going to have to play by ICANN's rules. Those rules give them a voice in choosing administrators equal to ICANN's own, so they're not exactly groaning under the lash here.
I assume you must be referring to the white racist monkeys who came up with the plan to deprive tens of millions of blacks of an education. Talk about reaping what you sow.
The headline news said that Mike Lawrie hidden .za if he does not have his way. But a few minutes later
the keys abourd and will colaps
Mike Lawrie denices ever sending it. I think
the press put word in his mouth and that we need to wait until he has his say before we judge him.
Do not underestimate the power of the Dark side
As usual, a since person sprouting bullshit and claiming the support of everyone. A few facts? Try to get them straight:
The bill will set up a section 21 company to control the .za domain. The government won't be doing it, or handing it to the incompetent IT division. They will be dictating policy to a company board.
The quotes about prosperity and Internet access are a media fuckup because they are completely out of context. They refer to the bill in general, which provides for better access to the underprivlidged, and recognition of the legal status of Internet communications. The comments do not apply to section X.
The "local internet community" you refer to are Namespace ZA, who are: 1. backed by industry interests, who don't want to see their monopoly as registrars threatened or be made to do more work by having to replace their shitty dispute resolution policities with something which is actually fair and legally sound; 2. represent a community of mainly technically oriented individuals, who are known to have an anti-government stance when it comes to regulation, and don't really give a shit about apply ZA policy and law to domain ownership.
You didn't need to mention you were a journalist: your complete lack of factual information or the ability to tell media hype from actual evidence make it obvious that you are one.
i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
FUCKWIT RESPONSE SERVICE REPLY #20895:
The government is creating a section 21 (non-profit) company to administer the .za namespace, including policy matters and the appointment of registrars.
This does NOT affect third-level domain registration, except where those domains are in conflict with SA law.
i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
they are a logical construct brought into and maintained in existence by whoever runs the root servers, for the convenience of internet users. Those who run the root servers have pledged no allegiance or subordination to the South African government.
I have no idea how the domain name system works. However, the internet has become a public resource, and national governments are in the best position to regulate public resources.
Which is the more reasonable outcome: to have the country domains regulated by the corresponding governments (presumably democratically elected by their people), or by a group of arbitrary, unelected system administrators?
The fact that domain names are not bricks or mortar is irrelevant; we're in the 21st century, assets don't have to be physical.