Slashdot Mirror


MSIE 5.2 for Mac OS X Released

Jarrett writes "MSIE 5.2 now supports Quartz text smoothing and a slew of other reliability/security [hehe] improvements on Mac OS X. Its performance is noticably better, it seems to end the spinning beach ball problems, and is stable. It's available on Microsoft's Mactopia site" Posted With Mozilla(tm) on Mac OS X.

94 comments

  1. Talk about instant gratification... by AnamanFan · · Score: 1

    I read about the new release at Mac Minute and quickly get to /. to report the news, when the news about the update was just posted. Now's that's instant gratification!

    --
    AnamanFan - Trying to find the Truth, one post at a time.
    1. Re:Talk about instant gratification... by phyxeld · · Score: 2

      Damn do I feel special.
      I was complaining about this crappy update hours before it was posted on slashdot!

      (complaining because the drag-and-drop install method seems to have gone out of style, and because it sets your homepage to msn, and because i'm real bitter at microsoft for other recent mac fuckups.)

      I still havn't installed it though, but if it fixes the spinning-beachball problem I may just break down and go for it.

      --
      __
      Choose mnemonic identifiers. If you can't remember what mnemonic means, you've got a problem. - Larry Wall
    2. Re:Talk about instant gratification... by Golias · · Score: 2
      So far, I'm not thrilled with it.

      The anti-aliasing has gotten worse rather than better. Fonts now look fuzzier than they did with 5.1

      Yes, it does set MSN as the home page, but changing the home page is an easy thing to do.

      I think I will try it out for a couple weeks before I pass judgement.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  2. Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great too by repoleved · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So what if IE 5.2 is out for the Macintoshes? C'mon guys - you're cool enough not to be using Microsoft Windows in the first place, so why not leave Internet Explorer behind where it belongs (on a niche proprietary operating system that caters to people who like to spend money when they don't have to)?

  3. IE 5.2 codebase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is this a branch of the IE 5.0 codebase or does it incorporate the changes since IE 6?

    1. Re:IE 5.2 codebase by irony+nazi · · Score: 2
      I am using it right now. My guess is that it's still IE 5.0 codebase. Not really much is changed. I clicked on one of my bookmarks at the top only to find, that it still pulls down a menu occasionally, rather then going to the site of the bookmark.

      The quartz rendering is nice, but I havn't noticed many other improvements.

      --

      Bringing irony to the Slash-masses
    2. Re:IE 5.2 codebase by foniksonik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah quartz rendering is basically one line of code in OS X 10.1.5 which is why the makers of Silk could do it globally for all carbon apps via a preference pane with more options than any app I've seen so far. Obviously not a huge 'feature' in an app if a freeware version which is better is available before any of the apps which take advantage of it are even out. Just a new Apple API.

      IE 5.2 still lags way behind Mozilla on rendering /. pages with a significant number of posts. May have something to do with a lack of pipelining for http 1.1 .

      No tabs. I hate opeing a new freakin' window for every link that catches my eye and Mozilla also renders tabs in the background instead of throwing up a half-complete page in a new window I may be only marginally interested in to begin with. Plus pop-up/under control... sooo nice.

      Mozilla still doesn't work with bad javascript, more of a feature than a bug though... whereas IE will render about any version of half-assed code you want to throw at it as long as you intended it to be a drop down menu. Mozilla also doesn't support M$ inline frames or iframes or any of the other M$ created tags or CSS stuff they created because they didn't want to take the time to make ASP compliant.

      well that's the rant I suppose.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:IE 5.2 codebase by peter_goathead · · Score: 1

      >Mozilla also doesn't support M$ inline frames or iframes or any of the other M$ created tags or CSS stuff they created because they didn't want to take the time to make ASP compliant.

      hm. thats funny. the w3c html 4.1 standard includes iframes right here [w3c.org]

      heaven forbid microsoft implement something useful or good.

    4. Re:IE 5.2 codebase by lysurgon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mozilla still doesn't work with bad javascript, more of a feature than a bug though...

      Actually this causes me all sorts of problems. I agree with you that the average browsing experience of mozilla blows MSIE out of the water, and I use it for all work-related tasks and such.

      However, many important web portals I use to pay my bills (citibank, spring, verizon and 2 student loan companies) often use heavily crufted javascript. As a result, when I want to 'conduct business' online, I have to fire up IE. It just feels nasty. Any suggestions?

    5. Re:IE 5.2 codebase by elmer-12 · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I get that happening too.

      "that it still pulls down a menu occasionally, rather then going to the site ..."

    6. Re:IE 5.2 codebase by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      However, many important web portals I use to pay my bills (citibank, spring, verizon and 2 student loan companies) often use heavily crufted javascript. As a result, when I want to 'conduct business' online, I have to fire up IE. It just feels nasty. Any suggestions?

      Buy a box of envelopes and some stamps?

      That's what I do. Then again, I don't place a lot of stock in trusting my money to technology. Hell, I still won't get direct deposit for my paychecks.

      Back on topic, I'm posting this with Mozilla. In the rare case that a site won't work with it, it will work with Omniweb.

      IE is only on the home machine for my girlfriend, and on the work machine for the crappy web pages Filemaker Pro puts out.

      --saint

  4. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by dirtydamo · · Score: 1

    I would scarcely call an operating system that 95% of the world's PCs run "niche."

    IE is a great browser, Mozilla is a great browser. Let people choose the browser they prefer.

  5. Don't know about IE but.... by crawdad62 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I swear I found that Entourage is faster. Not sure why but the IE update made it very noticeable. As far as IE is concerned I haven't found anything to it. Mine was always rock solid and Silk already handled the smoothing.

  6. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by grammar+nazi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Actually, I have always hated MS, used Mac's, switched to Linux on Intel, switched back to Mac (with the ti powerbooks).

    I use MS Office vX on my TiBook for work and school related things (no other program even approaches Excel in maturity and performance for my work and school applications). Anyways, after a searching the internet in vane for an OSX calendar/scheduling program, I came up empty handed. I was tempted by the dark side (MS) and installed Entourage off of my Office CD. It didn't work, giving me a funny error message and then crashing every time I tried to start it.

    After checking online, searching for this error message for ~10 minutes, I decided to give the MS Customer support line a call. I didn't have to stay on hold for more than 10 seconds throughout the entire call. After a few voicemail selections, I was dumped to one support guy who, after asking a few questions, referred me to a Mac support guy. The Mac support guy stepped through a few troubleshooting hoops with me, figured out what the problem was and fixed it.

    The entire phone call took less than 10 minutes and I was entouraging away. The tech support even told me how to use entourage as a calendar program and *not* an email program.

    The point is, MS is a large company. They might break a few antitrust laws and stifle a little innovation here and there, but don't forget that this is capitalism. The consumer rules! Take advantage of what MS does offer. In my case it's good phone support and reasonable software. In the case related to this story, it's IE for Mac. Use IE for the Mac. Use Mozilla for the Mac. Make an educated decision about which is better. Use one or the other, both or neither. The educated consumer is the best thing to be in a capitalistic society.

    You are already using a Mac, so you aren't forced to use one thing over another. MS will work hard making good apps for the Apple if they will be rewarded by consumers buying/using them.

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  7. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the Legacy Niche.

  8. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
    I would scarcely call an operating system that 95% of the world's PCs run "niche."

    You apparently did not catch the sarcasm. I believe he was suggesting that Macintoshes as a proprietary system that caters to people who like to spend money when they don't have to.

  9. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by dirtydamo · · Score: 1

    I am an idiot.

    :)

  10. Update changes your homepage... by dasspunk · · Score: 1

    to msn.com. Jackasses...

    I've been looking at all the other browsers for OS X and they're getting really close. I really want to have one less M$ product on my beloved iBook. As good as the Mactopia group's software is, it's still Microsoft and I don't like the way they do business period. I look forward to getting rid of the last of it...

    1. Re:Update changes your homepage... by analog_line · · Score: 3, Informative

      Get the new testing version of Mozilla. 1.01a I believe. Quartz rendering, and it's FAST, and very stable. Never had it crash once, looks great. I've stopped using Chimera altogether, it's so fast and stable.

      Still have IE for the few sites that require it, but I can't remember the last time I used it.

    2. Re:Update changes your homepage... by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 1

      Problem with Mozilla (for me and except crappy interface) is that it doesn't use the system preferences for proxy connection. That's really REALLY important to me... (since I'm a iBook user.. I use the Location Manager a LOT)..

      Ah well.. stuck with IE and OmniWeb :P

    3. Re:Update changes your homepage... by iMMersE · · Score: 1

      Well, get the source and do it yourself :)

      Actually, this is something I've been meaning to do, I'm in the same boat as you, and yep, it's annoying ... Just ain't enough time in the day!

      --
      codegolf.com - smaller *is* better.
    4. Re:Update changes your homepage... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      does no-one else use Netscape 6? I use browsers under OSX in the following oreder of preference:- Omniweb 4.1, Netscape 6.2.2, Chimera 0.3, Opera, IE. Netscape 6.2 is really a pretty solid browser for OSX, I rarely find a perverted-code site it can't deal with.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  11. IE and Microsoft bugs persist by Slur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like the Javascript Prompt bug persists. If you're using any version of IE5 for MacOSX put this in the address-line and see the bug of which I speak:

    javascript:x=prompt("This Text Should Appear")

    Explorer is getting about one bullet-item per-month upgrade, just to keep us hoping. Meanwhile several browsers are poised to overtake Explorer in standards-compliance and standards-implementation, and have already overtaken Explorer in features we like, like disabling ad banners and popups.

    The fact that IE 5.2 sets the Home Page to MSN is a sure sign that MicroSoft can't let go of its old nasty little indulgences. As if switching the whole west coast to MSN didn't get our attention.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
    1. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by MoiTominator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Explorer is getting about one bullet-item per-month upgrade, just to keep us hoping. Meanwhile several browsers are poised to overtake Explorer in standards-compliance and standards-implementation, and have already overtaken Explorer in features we like, like disabling ad banners and popups.

      I _wish_ we were getting one bullet-item per-month upgrade. Hasn't even really been that good. I think we've been misled as to the size and resources of the Mac development team at MS. It looks like maybe they have one part-time programmer working on IE and a couple others maintaining Office X.

      Given the bounds that MSN Messenger 3.0 recently made, they must have ten or twenty programmers working on that

    2. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by vikingstad · · Score: 1
      The fact that IE 5.2 sets the Home Page to MSN is a sure sign that MicroSoft can't let go of its old nasty little indulgences.

      Sure, it`s a little nasty and everything, but is it really a problem? I mean, Microsoft delivers currently the best allround browser for the Mac, and it`s free.

      Setting msn.com as the default homepage is something I can live with as long as IE is still free and being updated, and it`s very easy to change (even for Mac-people :p ).

    3. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      No its not, Mozilla is better than IE on any platform. Show me a site that dosen't snif the UAGENT/jscript browser string that displays incorrectly in Moz but not IE, and show me IE do tabs/popup killing/cookie control/image control/password control/form control at even 1/10th Moz's level and you have a case.

      Since none of that is happening, IE is the underdog in everything except marketshare.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    4. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by billvinson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately, MSN Messenger 3.0 is a sad excuse for an IM client due to one serious bug (at least for this iBook user). If your machine sleeps then Messenger doesn't log you out, or anything. When the machine awakens Messenger is in a bad state where very little works. Can't change state. It doesn't know you aren't still logged in, etc.

      Fire.app gets around this by logging out on sleep and logging back in on an awaken action. It's hard to believe MS hasn't dealt with this yet.

      Bill

    5. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And MSIE only has market share on the Mac because of it being bundled (there's that word again ...) with OS X and OS 9 for the past few years. I'm quite hopeful that a different browser will debut on OS X v10.2, though I'm not entirely sure which that would be. Chimera is quite nice as an "in development" Cocoa native Gecko browser. Of course Moz is what I use 99.9% of the time ... Of course, there's OmniWeb and quite a few others. I actually never use IE anymore ... if a site sniffs the USER_AGENT string and won't let me in, fine - I won't try any harder.

      As a web developer, I can say with authority that sites restricting to IE only (or for heaven's sake, NS4+IE) are doing so out of sheer laziness or lack of skill. With the company I work for, cross-browser/platform compatibility is not an option, the client pays for it and gets it regardless of the size of the project. We try very hard not to release pages of any kind that are not good 'Netizens.

      Ah, well ... my rant's over :) Back to work!

    6. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by vikingstad · · Score: 1
      I am sorry, but currently I don't see Mozilla having any significant advantages over IE. Internet Explorer is faster than Mozilla, at least on my machine and the interface is better. The Mozilla versions I have tried, and it's not few, tends to crash more frequently than IE.

      However, what is more important is that most sites (which I'm sorry to say are made for IE for Windows in mind) are better handled in IE for Mac.

      Another thing I don't like with Mozilla is that it doesn't support the Windows Media Plugin. Yeah, I know it sucks, but I stumble across Windows Media all the time, and it's nice to have the option to see it.

      Other than that, I don't like how slow Mozilla is to start up, and I certainly don't like how it's trying to be everything, in addition to a web browser (Mail, News etc.). Why can't they just concentrate on making the best possible browser - and only that(!) - instead?

      Anyway, I really hope Mozilla will pick up soon, and Chimera really shows some promise. I'll keep downloading new versions along the way, and when I find anything better than IE I'll change on a heart-beat!

    7. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      Honestly, what site other than passport and UAGENT sniffing sites don't render correctly? I haven't seen one, perhaps you can enlighten me.

      WMP plugin isn't something I use, so YMMV. If you don't like the startup time try 1.1a it got alot faster once they stoped working on 'other things'.

      All of the features I listed in the other are advantages.

      You can change the UI to have pink flamingos and roses and rolex watches if you so wish, it's what skins are for. It's silly to complain about a skinable application looking odd.

      I have not seen mozilla crash since (on any platform/os) 0.9.9, if you do, are you using a feedback enabled build? Are you sending the feedback? Thats the only way your specific problem can be fixed.

      In the end, I urge you to give 1.1a a try, I can hardly stand to use IE anymore after using Mozilla as my primary browser for several months. The interface for IE is just too clunky, and I can reliably cause it to crash with a little bit of creative JS scripting (which happens to be used on ezboard.com ...). And to be honest, I haven't noticed a single mis-rendered site since I changed my UAGENT to MSIE, a cheap hack, but I needed to for a site I regular (it rendered fine with it set, which rather annoyed me, I don't visit the site as often any more..)

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    8. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a WMP plugin if you want one, try the about:plugins page...

      If your going to diss mozilla, at least have a valid reason..

  12. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. best alternative. by doooras · · Score: 4, Informative

    OmniWeb is the browser that finally let me quit using IE. Mozilla, in its latest incarnations, is great but it still has little things that bug me. O.W. 4eva, yo.

    1. Re:best alternative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why OmniWeb is a big fucking Joke

      (the joke is on the end user, as a web developer who uses CSS for everything, I just sit back and laugh. We've come to a time when 90% of users have CSS-supporting browsers; if your going to use something like omniweb you may as well just pull out an old copy of Netscape 3 or something. How do you sleep at night? More importantly, how do you browse the web during the day??!!)

  14. Tried it for 10 minutes. by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 3, Informative

    It looks better than it did, and has fewer rendering problems, but it still seemed dog slow(compared to OmniWeb, Mozilla, AND IE for 9.x). Also, I quickly found a page that didn't load more than a third of the way, and needed a Reload to get the rest of it. I'll keep it, but it's not going on my dock. I've got two other browsers there already.

    --
    "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    1. Re:Tried it for 10 minutes. by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      One other note on IE installation. Since the installer replaced the older version of IE that came with MacOS X, it seems to have inherited the permissions of the older version. That is, it's owned by the system, and I can't get rid of it now without enabling root access. Almost seems like Microsoft is going for the "It's part of the OS" argument again. ;-)

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
  15. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

    It looks great? It LOOKS GREAT?

    It has excellent standard compliance. Great rendering speed. It might even sport quartz-rendering in 1.1. But looks isn't exactly what it has going for it. It sticks out like a sore thumb in a hand of aqua.

    --
    "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  16. Shameless Plug Time! by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    Since this article is only getting replies about how you should be using an alternate browser, we should have a shameless plug for Chimera, which gives you the great rendering engine and standards complicance of the Gecko engine in a real Cocoa application (with a Mach-O backend for great speed). It's only at version 0.3, but is already usable as an everyday browser, and the download size is down to 6747 KB. Check out the:
    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  17. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by am+2k · · Score: 1
    Anyways, after a searching the internet in vane for an OSX calendar/scheduling program, I came up empty handed.
    You've never heard of Palm Desktop, right? I'm using it all the time in Mac OS X, it works great and is FREE (no Palm device required).
  18. Not even worth mentioning by vikingstad · · Score: 1
    This update doesn`t really provide anything significant. All I can see it does is add Quartz Text Smoothing, which is nice, but I had the same thing with Silk already. And talking about security improvements; those were already done in 5.1.4...

    Anyway, I expect IE 6.0 to be out pretty soon now, as reported by thinksecret.com. Maybe MWNY? We need faster rendering, up to par with IE for Windows, and better certificate handling.

    Other than that, IE is still the only real all-round browser alternative for the Mac!

  19. Won't Install by pudge · · Score: 3, Funny

    MSIE 5.2 won't install without quitting my running apps.

    So, it won't be installed for some time.

    Maybe Microsoft is just jealous, wants to bring everyone else down to its OS level.

    1. Re:Won't Install by gbooker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For me, this means that it will never be installed. The next time that I end up rebooting or shutting down my computer will be too far off for me to remember that this update even exist.

      I hate installers that do this. I have had many installers that install kernel extension that say the require a reboot. Well, I force quit them, su, find their extensions, and kextload. Never had any problems and the MP3 player was never interrupted in the process.

      Why on Earth do you have to quit my Apps MS? There is NEVER a good reason for it. No other browser requires anything like this. Besides, I hate the idea of authenticating something from MS. I guess that MS wants to loose the browser war on OS X. They sure seem to be acting like it.

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    2. Re:Won't Install by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Informative

      MSIE 5.2 won't install without quitting my running apps. So, it won't be installed for some time. Maybe Microsoft is just jealous, wants to bring everyone else down to its OS level.

      Don't blame Microsoft for this. Blame MindVision. The installer is built with Installer VISE from MindVision, version 7.4.1, which I believe is a direct carbonization of their OS 9 installer-builder product. Back in OS 9 days, quitting all running programs to install software was a resonable, if not necessarily correct, thing to do, so that's why the installer does it.

      "About Installer..." should tell you everything you want to know.

      I'm as annoyed at this "feature" as anybody, but blame the right party for it.

    3. Re:Won't Install by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Why on Earth do you have to quit my Apps MS? There is NEVER a good reason for it. No other browser requires anything like this.

      Refer to this comment. Microsoft shouldn't take the blame for this. It's MindVision's fault. They built the installer-builder that Microsoft (and lots and lots of others) used.

    4. Re:Won't Install by pudge · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am a registered user of VISE, and use it for the MacPerl installers. It does not require you quit all applications. That is a preference the builder of the installer may choose. It certainly is not necessary to quit all running programs when installing Mac OS 9 software. Sorry, but the blame is not MindVision's, nor Apple's, unless there is something we don't know about Mac OS X itself that requires Microsoft to enable this feature, which is unlikely.

    5. Re:Won't Install by foobar104 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Okay, then. I stand corrected. Dang. I thought I was being all insightful, too. ;-)

    6. Re:Won't Install by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2

      I know you've rescinded this comment elsewhere (because the builder decides whether VISE kills other apps), but I do have to point out that MS chose to package the install with VISE, despite the fact that there are eight million other apps that don't need to. It's totally their fault. They're trying to make OS X look crappy.

    7. Re:Won't Install by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      MS chose to package the install with VISE, despite the fact that there are eight million other apps that don't need to.

      I agree with you that application installers are pretty much obsolete for OS X, and that if you need one you should use Apple's installer, but in all fairness VISE is the most common installer-maker for Mac OS. It's not like Microsoft went out of their way to find a lousy one, or wrote their own just to be stubborn.

    8. Re:Won't Install by gbooker · · Score: 1

      MS chose to package the install with VISE, despite the fact that there are eight million other apps that don't need to. It's totally their fault.

      Well, lets look at web browsers.
      OmniWeb - Mount this disk image and copy to your hard drive.
      Mozilla - Same thing
      Chimera - I believe it is the same (been a while since I played with it).
      IE - Run this installer, Authenticate it, and quit all your apps (my case, averages around 17 including my MP3 player and FIRE where I would like to chat with people while it installs), install, and then reset the cookie prefs and default home page.

      The verdict: Between the other browsers on my system, IE no longer has much of a place. I only need it now for those sorry excuses of web sites that can't be bothered to follow HTML standards. Sorry MS, but you are going to have to learn that if you want to keep the browser market on OS X, you are going to have to <gasp>compete.</gasp>

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
  20. IE/Mac IE/Win by Fweeky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For some reason, Microsoft's IE/Mac and IE/Win teams are completely different; while IE5/Mac was hailed as having one of the best CSS1 implimentations, IE5/Win was still struggling with the box model (and happily making all your boxes too big, because the IE/Win team can't read, obviously).

    So don't go lumping IE/Mac in with IE/Win - they're completely different browsers which happen to share the same name.

    A List Apart: Why IE/Mac Matters

  21. Two Things by usr122122121 · · Score: 1
    1) Why do some software developers consider anti-aliasing the holy grail of software development worthy a point release?

    2) Did they actually publish a list of security fixes? I usually like to know what an update does before I install it...

    --

    -braxton
  22. MICROSOFT SUCKS by pudge · · Score: 2

    They changed my browser preferences, without asking me, back to MSIE as my default browser. Jerkfaces.

    1. Re:MICROSOFT SUCKS by gbooker · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used to have IE to the point where it would set itself as the default browser every time it was launched. I had to search for every file that was changed that day to find where this preference is stored since MS didn't consider that I might want to use another browser. Here is the fix:

      Edit the file Library/Preferences/com.apple.internetconfig.plist

      Look for the key: IEAsDefaultNoBotherPrefKey, and delete the entire key segment. Save it (keep a backup in case). Change the default browser in Internet in System Prefs and then launch IE. When it asks if you want IE to be your default browser, hit no.

      Now, why MS had to put this in the internet config plist is beyond reason. A hint to MS: We don't want you junk in the system. It is OK if it is bundled and easily separated, but we want the option to be able to get rid of it all. If it were in the MS Prefs, I would have just deleted those and gone on with my life, but now, I may just delete IE instead and never have to worry about this again.

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    2. Re:MICROSOFT SUCKS by pudge · · Score: 1

      I stopped running MSIE on Mac OS 9 because it kept corrupting my system Internet Preferences file. It would add crap into the file, crash, and corrupt the file, and I would lose all of my preferences. Yay!

    3. Re:MICROSOFT SUCKS by amichalo · · Score: 1

      ... or as an alternative to editing the plist, you can do it the way Apple intended:
      - Go to System Perferences
      - Select Internet
      - Click the Web tab
      - In the Default Web Browser drop down, choose Select
      - Browse to Mozilla or Chimera Navigator and enjoy!

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    4. Re:MICROSOFT SUCKS by gbooker · · Score: 1

      One problem, next time you launch IE, it becomes the default. Trust me, if it were this easy, I would not be editing the plist. Just IE set itself as the default every time it was launched.

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
  23. MICROSOFT STILL SUCKS by pudge · · Score: 2

    Jeez, and now I see they put an installer log file in my document root!

    Is there no end to the madness?

  24. Different Needs Met w/Different Browsers by Spencerian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the office, I have to have my needs met by a slurry of browsers.

    IE (which does have a different code base than its PC counterpart--remember that IE6 in Windows is an embedded component of the OS, unlike the Mac version) is the most compatible with most Internet pages, but also the most annoying. Go to the wrong page, and you're in pop-up hell. The new font smoothing makes it a little more palatable, however. You can't use anything but IE if you hit pages that are loaded with JavaScript, complex style sheets, or ActiveX controls. Java support appears generally OK--better than in the OS 9 versions, but still lacking somehow. This browser works on corporate pages where all others fail, and is the only one that handles Apple's WebObjects properly.

    OmniWeb is my browser of general choice. The current 5 beta has matured well with standards compliance and compatibility, and allows pop-up control. It may still choke on pages obviously created only for Windows users in mind. It's font smoothing is the best of the lot. The beta isn't always stable for some pages, such as CNN.

    Netscape 6 is used when neither IE or OmniWeb are working properly.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:Different Needs Met w/Different Browsers by Laplace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Omni Web needs tabbed browsing. Only then will it become The One, True Browser for OS X.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    2. Re:Different Needs Met w/Different Browsers by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

      give them a year. It is scheduled for 5.0, which hopefuly will start showing up @ sneakypeak in less then 6 months.

    3. Re:Different Needs Met w/Different Browsers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just cmd+tilde between windows, have all your windows on top of each other.

      cmd+tilde is the best feature no one knows about.

  25. Much better on old g3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people are reporting no noticeable change in performance. However, running on a g3 Wallstreet powerbook scrolling is much much faster. Rendering times may not have changed much, but the interface is debatably the most responsive on my computer now. This is a very good thing, afaic, as UI performance is a constant irritation on my computer.

  26. You're surprised? by theolein · · Score: 2

    This is the same company that makes IE undeletable on Windows.

  27. You're joking, surely? by theolein · · Score: 2

    I installed it and as soon as I took a look at it's MSN default, it went off the task bar. Moz 1.0 does just fine on my Mac and let's *me* control it, not the other way around.

  28. Love Mozilla, but with email??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just moved from a PC to a Mac three weeks ago. In a move to try life without Microsoft I'd love to switch to Mozilla (would be Open Source all the way if Linux/FreeBSD handled fonts, vector graphics, etc. better). Question is it is possible to use an external email client like Eudora with it or does it suffer the Netscape curse of locking you into its email software if you like to click on HTML mailto links? Know there was a script for Netscape (from Eudora) to get break through this. Is there anything for Mozilla out there??? Some simple setting I don't see in Mozilla's preferences?

    1. Re:Love Mozilla, but with email??? by Duck_Taffy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's possible to use Eudora with Mozilla. I've done it for a long time. The AppleScript still exists on Qualcomm's FTP server in their Eudora scripting examples. I'd assume that if setting it in the System Preferences doesn't work, that you could just modify the script, replacing "Netscape Communicator" with "Mozilla"

      I actually read the script a couple of weeks ago. I can't remember it exactly, but it was very simple. It was something like this:

      on run
      tell application "Netscape Communicator"
      register protocol "CSOM" for protocol "mailto:"
      end tell
      end run

      --
      Karma: Ran over your dogma.
    2. Re:Love Mozilla, but with email??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your reply. I don't have any experience with Applescript, but when I run the above or Eudora's script and change Netscape to Mozilla (or even before) I get an "Expected end of line but found identifier" error with first protocol highlighted. Any ideas? I'm using OSX 10.1.5

      The Eudora download script is:

      tell application "Netscape Communicator(TM)"
      register protocol "CSOm" for protocol "mailto:"
      end tell

    3. Re:Love Mozilla, but with email??? by sobchak · · Score: 1

      This works for me with Mail.app and Mozilla.

      Go to "~/Library/Mozilla/Profiles/username/some_mess.slt " directory. Create a plain text file called "prefs.js" and place the following text in that file:

      user_pref("network.protocol-handler.external.mailt o", true);

      Then save your text file, quit and relaunch Mozilla and you'll find that Mozilla will now use your default mail client as set in System Preferences/Internet.

      Works like a charm with Mail.app with Moz 1.0 and 1.1a in 10.1.5.

    4. Re:Love Mozilla, but with email??? by sobchak · · Score: 1

      Oops. For some reason, using HTML is misformatting the darn code. It should be:

      user_pref("network.protocol-handler.external.mai lt o", true);

    5. Re:Love Mozilla, but with email??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remove the space between "mailt o" so that it becomes "mailto". (This STILL may not be formatted, but hopefully you get the idea.)

      Btw, it seems that IE 5.2 is the culprit in the misformatted text.

  29. Not a good thing. by Duck_Taffy · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I installed it. It required me to quit all open apps, as other users mentioned. This really makes me curious as to what M$ is modifying at the OS level. Why couldn't this just be an item in Software Update? So anyway, after installing, I launch it, and my homepage is switched to msn.com without asking...suddenly it no longer respects my Internet PrefPane settings. So I had to go in and manually change my homepage back in the IE Preferences. But while I was on msn.com, I noticed something - text was overlapping graphics. The layout was completely screwed up. Text was suddenly outside the bounds of table cells. Or that's how it seemed anyway - msn may be using some bad CSS code that renders fine in IE for Windows (which notoriously miscalculates CSS margins) and then is broken in other browsers. I'm not sure what the problem was, but it was ugly. So then I visited a few sites, and it looked like it was using the Quartz text anti-aliasing, but not the Quartz metrics. All of the letters were tracked way too tightly. And then it seemed that anything below 12 pt was not anti-aliased, so with the mixed anti-aliasing and QuickDraw text, it was very, very ugly. And even though it seemed a bit faster than previous versions, it's still not up to snuff with the competing mac browsers, so I'm still keeping OmniWeb 4.1b7 as my default and Mozilla 1.1a as my alternate (which incorporates the Quartz Text Anti-aliasing with no layout problems, and so far no crashes either - and it's an Alpha rlelease!) I would use Chimera more, but I find that even 0.3 is prone to unexpected quits.

    --
    Karma: Ran over your dogma.
  30. mod parent up plz by valmont · · Score: 2


    really great find! i had been looking into thwarting this evil behaviour for a while now. thanks man :) (u made my boss really happy too ;]).

  31. Other stuff by Laplace · · Score: 2

    Installation involves copying exactly one file into your applications folder (or wherever else you want it).

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
  32. Not Impressed So Far... by SPYvSPY · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...I've had the update installed for about two hours. In that time, I've noticed:

    1) The installer requires you to quit all other apps. What is this, OS 9? Windows? Microsoft still doesn't get it. They give you the thing on a .dmg and then make you run an installer? What nasty files are they hiding from view?

    2) It changes your homepage to msn.com. Nice touch. I'm *thrilled* by the first impression that this install is making so far... Makes you wonder what other prefs are being overwritten.

    3) Within minutes of starting it up, I had the mother of all spinning beachball delays. It went on for over a minute. So much for being an improvement over the last crappy IE.

    4) Text is now anti-aliased, as it has been with OmniWeb, et al. for what seems like years. Bogus.

  33. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by extrasolar · · Score: 2

    "no other program even approaches Excel in maturity and performance for my work and school applications"

    Gnumeric?

    "Anyways, after a searching the internet in vane for an OSX calendar/scheduling program, I came up empty handed."

    Not sure what your needs are, but Emacs has a nice calendar application. Also GNOME has a PIM application.

  34. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by grammar+nazi · · Score: 2
    I tried gnumeric for a while. I planned on using that or Staroffice or some combination of both. Although gnumeric and Staroffice are mature, they both don't compare to Excel in efficiency (solver convergence speed), keyboard shortcuts (sorry, I'm used to Excel's keyboard shortcuts), VBA scripting (Python in gnumeric is way cooler, but none of my coworkers or classmates know Python). This leaves little choice for me.

    I use very complicated spreadsheet financial modeling programs at work, and I need to be able to read complex spreadsheets. For school, my professors need to be able to test my spreadsheet models.

    Don't worry, though. I use Octave and Perl/Python whenever I can get away with it in school and in work. Recently, however, I am being forced to use MS .Net to develop a web application at work. ;-(

    I'm going to approach it with an open mind and see if it is actually cool or not.

    WRT emacs as a calendar program... Yeah right! (sarcasm). I didn't play umpteen thousand dollars for a Powerbook in order to use a program that clashes with aqua. I don't care if it's an aquafied emacs. I want something pretty!

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  35. Re:best alternative - not really... by pteaxwa · · Score: 1

    how can you stand it? it has netscape 4.x like standards support. any self respecting web surfer should stay from omni-web.

    more info here: http://www.webstandards.org/act/campaign/buc/

  36. Re:IE 5.2 codebase - WORLD RECORD WANK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a joke. Who the hell are you pretending to be ?

  37. Follow Up! by SPYvSPY · · Score: 3, Informative

    I trashed IE 5.2 and installed Mozilla 1.0. Now, my network configuration has mysterious flipped out and pulls down "255.255.255.255" for every DHCP field from my hub. Gee, I wonder which application manipulated my system preferences to cause that?

    1. Re:Follow Up! by Maserati · · Score: 2
      That sounds like a different problem. OS X 10.15 has a bug which may cause your system to lose its DHCP lease and never try and renew it. The recommended fix is to delete the file com.apple.PowerManagement.plist.


      This is from KB document 106905

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  38. PNG support by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    Does the new revision of Internet Explorer display PNG images yet? AFAIK, IE 5.1 is the only browser on the Mac that won't show PNGs, it's really shameful.

    1. Re:PNG support by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      As I'm sure someone's about to flame you.. I know what you mean.

      MSIE supports PNG just fine.. as inline images. But if you go to a URL which is a PNG image, it won't load, and will try to offer to help you by opening some other app to do it.

      And no, MSIE 5.2 doesn't fix this bug, or the other bug I experiance regularlly, where it doesn't put text in javascript popup windows.

      Stupid IE.

      *smacks*

  39. Going back to 5.1 by heidialyssa · · Score: 1

    Horrible program. At least with 5.1, the beach ball doesn't spin for over a minute. Chimera rocks.

  40. Why isn't IE in Software Update? by mactari · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whoa!! I'm pretty sure the IE 5.1 update showed up when I ran the Software Update utility in OS X. Wonder why 5.2 isn't showing up and is a download on the Mactopia website instead. Wonder if it has any connection with the iBrowser rumor that's been going around.

    I didn't believe the rumors at first, and probably still don't, but this is a weird break from tradition here.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  41. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    hell yeah! Mozilla and Omniweb for me.....

  42. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mozilla looks absolutely gorgeous if you use silk (get it at www.versiontracker.com)

  43. why i use IE by spike666 · · Score: 2

    ok first this disclaimer.
    -i hate microsoft. i'm forced to work with them at work, and for me the mac is the one true way to have an OS work.
    - i love opensource. i push it whenever i can at work. and i'm in the position to do that.
    - to me, microsoft = software mediocrity. and they've made bad software acceptable.

    that being said, i use IE on the mac. on osX. i also fire up opera and mozilla at points, but i primarily use IE.
    why? well, its the features. i LOVE some of the things that mac IE has. things that arent even in Win-IE. things that arent in Mozilla. or Opera, or OmniWeb. or iCab.

    - the autocomplete in the URL bar also completes based on title. if i have a bookmark, or a recent history webpage that had a title of "booyah" and was at "foobar.com" i could type in booyah or foobar and it would pop me to the right web page. thats convienience and quite the mac-like intuition i love.
    - the scrapbook - totally cool. yeah, theres similar in moz now.
    - page holder. i like it, but dont use it all that much. again, also avail in moz
    - aquafied text. ok, IE5.2 finally uses the 10.1.5 updates carbon -> aqua hook. it looks great! for a few weeks i was running Silk, but to tell you the truth, i've tossed silk away now. IE5.2 builtin does it MUCH BETTER than silk did.
    - it feels more mac like. less so than omniweb or icab, but more so than opera, or mozilla. it has the right feel for mac.
    - IE 5.x xml rendering. i use xml a bunch at work, and the builtin xml rendering is nice. why the heck cant someone incorporate this into moz?!?!?

    i HATE how ie spins around for a while on silly javascript. that pisses me off. and hwo about a setting where popups / popunders are disabled?

    that off my chest, i hope that soon the aqua mozilla adds these things i like. or if i could get tabs in IE. either way.

  44. last post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's end this mac faggotry once and for all!