Slashdot Mirror


MSIE 5.2 for Mac OS X Released

Jarrett writes "MSIE 5.2 now supports Quartz text smoothing and a slew of other reliability/security [hehe] improvements on Mac OS X. Its performance is noticably better, it seems to end the spinning beach ball problems, and is stable. It's available on Microsoft's Mactopia site" Posted With Mozilla(tm) on Mac OS X.

9 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Meanwhile, Mozilla 1.0 is out, and looks great by grammar+nazi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Actually, I have always hated MS, used Mac's, switched to Linux on Intel, switched back to Mac (with the ti powerbooks).

    I use MS Office vX on my TiBook for work and school related things (no other program even approaches Excel in maturity and performance for my work and school applications). Anyways, after a searching the internet in vane for an OSX calendar/scheduling program, I came up empty handed. I was tempted by the dark side (MS) and installed Entourage off of my Office CD. It didn't work, giving me a funny error message and then crashing every time I tried to start it.

    After checking online, searching for this error message for ~10 minutes, I decided to give the MS Customer support line a call. I didn't have to stay on hold for more than 10 seconds throughout the entire call. After a few voicemail selections, I was dumped to one support guy who, after asking a few questions, referred me to a Mac support guy. The Mac support guy stepped through a few troubleshooting hoops with me, figured out what the problem was and fixed it.

    The entire phone call took less than 10 minutes and I was entouraging away. The tech support even told me how to use entourage as a calendar program and *not* an email program.

    The point is, MS is a large company. They might break a few antitrust laws and stifle a little innovation here and there, but don't forget that this is capitalism. The consumer rules! Take advantage of what MS does offer. In my case it's good phone support and reasonable software. In the case related to this story, it's IE for Mac. Use IE for the Mac. Use Mozilla for the Mac. Make an educated decision about which is better. Use one or the other, both or neither. The educated consumer is the best thing to be in a capitalistic society.

    You are already using a Mac, so you aren't forced to use one thing over another. MS will work hard making good apps for the Apple if they will be rewarded by consumers buying/using them.

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  2. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by MoiTominator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Explorer is getting about one bullet-item per-month upgrade, just to keep us hoping. Meanwhile several browsers are poised to overtake Explorer in standards-compliance and standards-implementation, and have already overtaken Explorer in features we like, like disabling ad banners and popups.

    I _wish_ we were getting one bullet-item per-month upgrade. Hasn't even really been that good. I think we've been misled as to the size and resources of the Mac development team at MS. It looks like maybe they have one part-time programmer working on IE and a couple others maintaining Office X.

    Given the bounds that MSN Messenger 3.0 recently made, they must have ten or twenty programmers working on that

  3. Re:IE 5.2 codebase by foniksonik · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah quartz rendering is basically one line of code in OS X 10.1.5 which is why the makers of Silk could do it globally for all carbon apps via a preference pane with more options than any app I've seen so far. Obviously not a huge 'feature' in an app if a freeware version which is better is available before any of the apps which take advantage of it are even out. Just a new Apple API.

    IE 5.2 still lags way behind Mozilla on rendering /. pages with a significant number of posts. May have something to do with a lack of pipelining for http 1.1 .

    No tabs. I hate opeing a new freakin' window for every link that catches my eye and Mozilla also renders tabs in the background instead of throwing up a half-complete page in a new window I may be only marginally interested in to begin with. Plus pop-up/under control... sooo nice.

    Mozilla still doesn't work with bad javascript, more of a feature than a bug though... whereas IE will render about any version of half-assed code you want to throw at it as long as you intended it to be a drop down menu. Mozilla also doesn't support M$ inline frames or iframes or any of the other M$ created tags or CSS stuff they created because they didn't want to take the time to make ASP compliant.

    well that's the rant I suppose.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  4. Re:IE and Microsoft bugs persist by billvinson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unfortunately, MSN Messenger 3.0 is a sad excuse for an IM client due to one serious bug (at least for this iBook user). If your machine sleeps then Messenger doesn't log you out, or anything. When the machine awakens Messenger is in a bad state where very little works. Can't change state. It doesn't know you aren't still logged in, etc.

    Fire.app gets around this by logging out on sleep and logging back in on an awaken action. It's hard to believe MS hasn't dealt with this yet.

    Bill

  5. Different Needs Met w/Different Browsers by Spencerian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the office, I have to have my needs met by a slurry of browsers.

    IE (which does have a different code base than its PC counterpart--remember that IE6 in Windows is an embedded component of the OS, unlike the Mac version) is the most compatible with most Internet pages, but also the most annoying. Go to the wrong page, and you're in pop-up hell. The new font smoothing makes it a little more palatable, however. You can't use anything but IE if you hit pages that are loaded with JavaScript, complex style sheets, or ActiveX controls. Java support appears generally OK--better than in the OS 9 versions, but still lacking somehow. This browser works on corporate pages where all others fail, and is the only one that handles Apple's WebObjects properly.

    OmniWeb is my browser of general choice. The current 5 beta has matured well with standards compliance and compatibility, and allows pop-up control. It may still choke on pages obviously created only for Windows users in mind. It's font smoothing is the best of the lot. The beta isn't always stable for some pages, such as CNN.

    Netscape 6 is used when neither IE or OmniWeb are working properly.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  6. Re:Won't Install by gbooker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For me, this means that it will never be installed. The next time that I end up rebooting or shutting down my computer will be too far off for me to remember that this update even exist.

    I hate installers that do this. I have had many installers that install kernel extension that say the require a reboot. Well, I force quit them, su, find their extensions, and kextload. Never had any problems and the MP3 player was never interrupted in the process.

    Why on Earth do you have to quit my Apps MS? There is NEVER a good reason for it. No other browser requires anything like this. Besides, I hate the idea of authenticating something from MS. I guess that MS wants to loose the browser war on OS X. They sure seem to be acting like it.

    --
    You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
  7. Re:IE 5.2 codebase by lysurgon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mozilla still doesn't work with bad javascript, more of a feature than a bug though...

    Actually this causes me all sorts of problems. I agree with you that the average browsing experience of mozilla blows MSIE out of the water, and I use it for all work-related tasks and such.

    However, many important web portals I use to pay my bills (citibank, spring, verizon and 2 student loan companies) often use heavily crufted javascript. As a result, when I want to 'conduct business' online, I have to fire up IE. It just feels nasty. Any suggestions?

  8. Not Impressed So Far... by SPYvSPY · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...I've had the update installed for about two hours. In that time, I've noticed:

    1) The installer requires you to quit all other apps. What is this, OS 9? Windows? Microsoft still doesn't get it. They give you the thing on a .dmg and then make you run an installer? What nasty files are they hiding from view?

    2) It changes your homepage to msn.com. Nice touch. I'm *thrilled* by the first impression that this install is making so far... Makes you wonder what other prefs are being overwritten.

    3) Within minutes of starting it up, I had the mother of all spinning beachball delays. It went on for over a minute. So much for being an improvement over the last crappy IE.

    4) Text is now anti-aliased, as it has been with OmniWeb, et al. for what seems like years. Bogus.

  9. Why isn't IE in Software Update? by mactari · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whoa!! I'm pretty sure the IE 5.1 update showed up when I ran the Software Update utility in OS X. Wonder why 5.2 isn't showing up and is a download on the Mactopia website instead. Wonder if it has any connection with the iBrowser rumor that's been going around.

    I didn't believe the rumors at first, and probably still don't, but this is a weird break from tradition here.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.