Australia's Censored URL List Remains Hidden
kinsalis writes: "There is an article about the Electronic Frontiers Australia's failed attempt to have access to a list of sites which where deemed worth of censorship under Australian Internet censorship law. While it stands to reason that most of the sites would be child pornography, what is to stop someone slipping in any old url if no one can check the list?"
' Maybe it was marked troll because your statements were so incredibly stupid as a reply to the post you chose.
Poster: It's impossible to tell if it's down or blocked.
You: What sites are you saying are blocked, then, eh?
You wonder about 'this place,' when you should wonder why your parents decided to have kids'
I wonder about people who post as AC as well... The guy was commenting that certain sites didnt work - i was wondering what type of site - that's easy to say - as the 'blacklist' is no such thing and is voluntary i was intrigued.
Im sorry - i thought that was blindingly obvious but maybe i didnt explain it too well.
Oh and many thanks for the personal insult at the end - my daddy however didnt teach me to hide behind 'Anonymous Coward' status when i wanted to have a go at someone...
I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
" I think the question is how did he get +1 in the first place....."
The old fashioned way - make an account and post intelligent comments and get modded for them....
I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
http:// www.lustykoalabears.com
ButitsURLisonit.
Right now im laughing my self sick at the guy who wasted his mod points marking these posts over rated
slashdot moderation at its best..
I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
Let's assume you're a troll, and good enough to have positive karma. Let's further assume you log in to find 5 mod points? Given your idea of fun, what are you likely to do with them? Now was that really a waste? Or just mischivious, if bland entertainment?
i have just read this series of posts and i would love to see this on a site like k5 where all the moderators are seen and their ratings noticed - seems mod bombing at trolling are alive and well on this site still
and i just remembered why i dont have an account here anymore
"Your still dumb."
You're dumber, dumbass
There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
up until now ive always moderated fairly and honestly and done the same for metamoderation.
Guess whos in a bad mood now and has his mod points left ? if you cant beat them...join them...
no he still has a 1 and the person who was goaded into this with him got 0's from the brave moderators..
maybe it is best to be an anonymous coward. Better to be a member with mod points.....
Here's how stupid this system is.
I'm at 50 Karma (I was until yesterday).
So I posted something. I thought it was good.
I got +5 insightful.
Wow. Hit a home run.
Then Somebody marked it as "overrated".
Guess what my karma is?
Yep. 49. That means 50 + 5 - 1 = 49 on slashdot.
Now, I don't really care about losing a karma point, but isn't that fucked up?
But the bigger problem (and I can karma whore with the best of them) is that if you know what to post, and you get it within the first 100 posts, I can almost guarantee a + 3-5 on Karma. You either joke about Microsoft, or point something out about some programming language in a scholarly way.
(There are other tips for max karma, but I'm writing a book... Slashdot for Dummies)
I metamoderate every night because I want to make sure the yahoos can't moderate any more, but I have a feeling my meta moderation (which really is quite good) is basically sent > nil.
Oh well. I feel like I'm rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic sometimes.
score 5: informative?!?!?!?
.gov guy waving his arms around screaning NO!! NOOOOO!!! NNOOOOOOOO!!!!
some
great guys...