Slashdot Mirror


Falun Gong Hacks Chinese Satellite

maetenloch writes: "Last week Falun Gong hackers in China were able to briefly take over the Sinosat-1 satellite and broadcast a banner for several minutes on all channels of China Central Television. This was apparently repeated several time on different channels on Sunday but so far the Chinese government has imposed a news blackout on the incident. However thanks to the Internet and the millions of witnesses, word has leaked out. Surprisingly, security on satellites can be very weak - often transponders are left on when not active and will continue to rebroadcast whatever is beamed at them. It's believed that Falun Gong used a 3 meter dish antenna mounted on a vehicle to overpower the government's uplink signal. This is not the only time that satellite signals have been hacked - there was the famous 'Captain Midnight' incident in 1986 and it's believed that Iraq has been attacking Kurdish satellite tv channels for several years. Hackers have even (discreetly) made use of the U.S. Navy's FleetSatCom satellites."

14 of 378 comments (clear)

  1. Disregard the politics for a second by ringbarer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whatever you think of Falun Gong vs. The Chinese Government, you've got to admit that this is a cool hack. The kind of thing you used to see in 'futuristicky' 1980's sci-fi movies.

    Moments like this, along with the Anthrax outbreak last year, are beginning to define socio-political conflict in the 21st Century.

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
  2. Friends of Falun Gong by ronfar · · Score: 5, Informative
    The main Friends of Falun Gong Website is here:

    Friends of Falun Gong

    The Falun Gong take on the story is here:

    Revealing Broadcasts Are Truly Serving the People-- From the Editors of FalunInfo.net: Falun Gong Practitioners Risk their Lives to Tell the Truth

    If you would like to help out the cause, there is a page about it here:

    Become a Friend- Alleviate the Suffering, End the Injustice

    --
    All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  3. Re:Reminds me of that scene in Hackers by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    s/websites/things

  4. But are you SURE by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are we very sure they weren't trying to signal AMSAT-OSCAR 7 and just missed?

  5. Re:Who's the "terrorist?" by bourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are the Falun terrorists for "hijacking" Chinese TV? Or are they rebels in a quest against the evil empire?

    Insofar as they aren't practicing any actual form of terror, I'm going to vote "not terrorist."

    To the best of my knowledge, they aren't...

    • Attacking or killing non-combatants
    • Threatening harm to non-combatants
    • Attacking or killing police or military forces
    • Threatening harm to police or military forces
    • Threatening vital public infrastructure

    I think, at worst, you could call them an insurgent organization. But in my book, no terror = no terrorism - and popping "falun gong is good" on the telly signal for a few seconds is not "terror" by any definition I've ever heard.

  6. Re:Falun Gong are terrorists. by Stiletto · · Score: 4, Insightful


    They could be seen as both. So could the Israeli soldiers who storm through Palestenian villages be seen as terrorists or "enforcers of law and order". It all depends on who is writing the book.

    Despite what GW Bush would like us to think, rarely is it the case where a person is "pure evil" or "pure good". It all depends on whos perspective you are looking from.

  7. TERROR is part of TERRORist for a reason. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IMO, the definition of "Terrorist" is not "Using crime to make yourself heard", but "Using crime to create fear and TERROR." - A key part of the word TERRORist.

    Terrorists use violence to make themselves heard, not generic crime.

    Using crime to make yourself heard is either simply immature (generic vandalism), or is activism (The civil rights movement, a key part of which was civil disobedience.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  8. Re:Reminds me of that scene in Hackers by TWR · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The problem isn't that China is a backwards police state. The problem is that it's a rapidly modernizing police state. That's a billion times scarier.

    All the idjits who whine about "1984" in the US aren't paying attention to the country where there's a good chance of it really happening.

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

  9. Re:Falun Gong a dangerous by jonerik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't be fooled by Falun Gong. They hide behind their sham-of-a-religion to promote an overthrow of the current government. Their leader is a coward and a phony who should be dragged out and shot.

    Let's hear it for President Jiang Zemin, everyone! Give him a big hand! Isn't he great?

  10. Re:What's the point of this? by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    You need to read Stratfor, and maybe some Foreign Affairs magazine.

    Fulan Gong originally had no political aspirations at all. Mostly just a self help group drawing on an odd collection of Chinese cultural traditions.

    But then the communist gov't decided there were too many of them (and a huge number of them were party officials themselves) and decided to repress them.

    All attempts to change the opinion of the Chinese gov't have failed, leaving the multitudes of followers with a choice:

    1. Disappear
    2. Foster regime change

    Since most members were part of the emerging middle class it is not surprising to see the kind of sophisticated hacking taking place. At least one hacking team has been caught and disappeared into the Chinese prison system. Which just shows that this group is far more sophisticated and robust than any had thought. They must have several teams out there. They are not just hacking satellites either- but also hijacking cables.

    Most of the attacks have taken place in North Eastern China- The Rust Belt of China. This area has the highest unemployment of the Nation, and has seen many demonstrations against the Gov't in the past several years. Again, this shows the sophistication of the group's planners and reveals their goal: change the gov't to one that will allow for freedom of expression and religion.

    As for comments by people calling them zealots and criminals, I'd take this lot over the lot of Zealots and criminals that has been running China for the past 50+ years any day!

    China is a great place (lived in Taiwan and Asia for 5 years), but the communists have done tremendous damage to Chinese culture (most notably during the Cultural Revolution)

    Does that help you understand?

  11. Bad Pun Alert (Again) by KC7GR · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, you have to admit this does have other possibilities. Perhaps Chuck Barris should be contacted to see if he'd like to host the Falun Gong Show...

    (I wonder if I'm going to lose karma points for that one...)

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  12. At least they are straightforward about it by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The chinese openly admit to censorship, restrictions on individual rights, etc.

    Here in the US, we are every bit as much a police state as china is, however we claim to be the freest place on earth. (richest sure, but the freedom is an illusion)

    Here we curtail civil liberties in "defense of freedom". Here we have a working massive fingerprint database, and a credit database that says if you are a good person or not, which furthermore you cannot argue against.

    Our government has huge monitoring systems which silently listen to communications all over the world combing for information.

    We have a War department that is called "The Dept. of Defense" which has been waging nearly perpetual war for 50 years across the globe.

    We have huge witchhunts for the enemy of the day "communists" "child molesters" "terrorists".

    The scariest thing is that it all arises without rigid central control: we censor ourselves to further our careers.

    The doublethink in the USA is getting pretty scary.

  13. Terrorist, as defined by USA PATRIOT by ehintz · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Since we seem to have a flurry of conflicting opinions regarding whether Falun Gong's activities are terrorism...

    USA PATRIOT defines domestic terrorism as activities that attempt "to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion".

    Dictionary.com defines "coerce" thus:
    coerce (k-ûrs)
    tr.v. coerced, coercing, coerces
    1. To force to act or think in a certain way by use of pressure,
    threats, or intimidation; compel.
    By that definition, Falun Gong are terrorists. So are all of us that marched on federal buildings attempting to use "pressure" to "compel" the DOJ to free Dmitry. Which serves as a good example of one of the many things that are wrong with USA PATRIOT.

    Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the terrorist party?
    --
    ehintz
  14. Re:Stirring a Hornet's nest by dalutong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "blindly patriotic" -- "love it or leave it"

    patriotism shouldn't be about kicking people out of america. america is supposed to be the all-accepting nation. if i want to walk around saying i hate america all day with a picture of bush laying dead on my shirt then i should be allowed to. patriotism isn't about supporting the current leader. it's about supporting the system. i believe in the morals of this country. separation of church and state, freedom of speech, electing my gov't representatives.

    but that's where the blindness comes in. when i'm told i should not practice my freedom of speech if i choose to. that's not patriotism on my accusers part.

    when i hear "love it or leave it" when i say that i agree that "under god" in the pledge or "in god we trust" on the money conflicts with the constitution (which is NOT a matter of majority rules -- that's the part of the government that is supposed to be permanent)

    when I didn't vote for bush yet somehow i have to approve of what he does? or even if i DID vote for bush and he pulls the stupid stunts he is not and i don't agree with him, i can't criticize him? I'm unpatriotic?

    NO! my accusers are unpatriotic! THEY don't understand what american stands for! It DOESN'T stand for profiling arabs. it DOESN'T stand for kicking all "unpatriotic" people out of the nation. it stands for freedom -- and the people who are so blind that they think that the current social system is promoting american values... then they are "blindly patriotic"

    after 9/11 bush came to visit my school. i didn't stand for him. i didn't clap.

    i was taken out of the auditorium and yelled at by several in the administration.

    that's blindly patriotic.

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?