Slashdot Mirror


Russia Wants to Launch Manned Mission to Mars

Raul654 writes "The Maimi Herald, via the Associated Press, is reporting that Russia wants to launch a manned mission to mars. The article says that the Russians are hoping to work closely with the European Space Agency and/or NASA. The 6 person, 440 day trip would cost around $20 billion. Should be interesting to see how this shapes up. See also here for mirror article."

13 of 496 comments (clear)

  1. Excellent! by Servo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This could be the boost to get NASA off its duff and on to Mars. The "space race" got us to the Moon, because we wanted to beat the Russians. I think this is just what we need.. some "friendly" competition.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Excellent! by Keiran+Halcyon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not necessarily a big money loss. When NASA first threw everything they had at going into space, the creativity boom was something we've benefitted from for years. Ever use velcro? It came about because of NASA.

      Rockets became highly feasable because they HAD to. NASA had to be able to do something quickly and easily (in terms of their own abilities) because it was necessary at the time. Who knows what kind of advancements will come from this?

      Maybe NASA will develop a more efficient fuel-cell based power system because it's obviously just not sound to power everything by solar cells.

      Friendly competition as you put it, not only fuels action, it also fuels the imagination. Look at JunkYard Wars for example. These people aren't highly trained to do exactly what they're doing for the most part, yet they manage it nine times out of ten. Imagine what will happen if several professional agencies sit down and start working together on something as important as this.

    2. Re:Excellent! by karm13 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      in german article about this yesterday, a read that only three would actually land on mars.

      imagine, travelling all the way, being in outer space in a tin can for eight months, and then one half has to stay in orbit, watch the others make history, have all the fun, and then listen to their stories about it all the way back...

      - "that was _so cool_! you have to try it for yourselves some day... i wish i could do it _again_!"

      --

      --
      making up good sigs is a hard thing to do.
  2. yeah right by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    does anyone actually believe the Russian promise to fund 30% (6 billion +) of the mission? Given their record with the ISS and the sorry state of their economy, I highly doubt it.

    1. Re:yeah right by guttentag · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I submitted this same story earlier today:
      # 2002-07-05 22:03:16 Russia Proposes International Mission to Mars (articles,space) (rejected)
      Only in my description, I mentioned that this article comes one day after the Iraqi ambassador announced his country is ready to repay the $8 billion Russia loaned it. That would conveniently cover 30% of $20 billion with money Russia probably never really expected to see, boost morale and raise Russia's international public image.

      I'm sure there are plenty of starving Russians who could think of something better to do with that money. Iraq doesn't feed its people either, but we know it has the money because of its oil trading and we know it's willing to pay that amount to gain Russia's friendship at a time when we are seeing regular reports in the news about Bush's plan to invade Iraq.

      I'm not grousing about the fact that my story was rejected, just adding information that the lucky submitter left out.

  3. Useful space travel may take a while. by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Columbus did his thing in 1492, yet colonization didn't really get going until the 1600s. Even then, there wasn't much settlement in North America outside of a strip about 100 miles from the ocean until after 1800.

    1. Re:Useful space travel may take a while. by jelle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      After invention of the wheel, it took humanity thousands of years to built a car. Yet after that, it was less than a century until they built airplanes and rockets, and flew to the moon.

      Things go faster now, and they are speedier too...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  4. Re:SOMEONE needs to do this. by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exploring another planet in our solar system is just what the space programs need to generate newfound interest. Nobody really cares about the ISS. It barely makes a 50 word story in the paper when they send up another branch of it. Sad but true. OTOH, Mars is a much more interesting topic. It's our nearest neighbor and will generate tons of info maybe even regarding our origins. The research could take decades to complete, thereby leading to advances in space travel, which naturally leads us to explore other planets. I think Mars is the ideal stepping stone and probably the most important goal in the near future.

  5. Space race part 2 by incom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It may even actually get done if America steps up and announces plans of their own.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  6. Why not be positive about this? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it that whenever there's a story mentioning Russia on /. that every patronising, xenophobic AC thinks that it's his patriotic duty to post some negative "reds-under-the-bed, they're-still-commie-bastards, huh-they're-all-drunk-on-vodka" comment?

    Some simple facts for the uneducated:

    1. Russia has the know-how.

    Russia still has more experience of manned space flight than everyone else put together, in terms of both man hours and missions. During the 80's and 90's, when NASA shuttle launches were red letter days, the Russian space agency was putting up cosmonauts as often as they wanted to.

    2. Mir, the Russian space station, was the best permenant orbiting platform ever built.

    Laugh all you want, but it was a damn sight more sucessful than Skylab, NASA's 70's project. Yes, Mir's final few years were dogged by near-disasters but virtually all of those could be traced back to some bean counter cutting back the budget here and there - the technology, engineering and science wasn't to blame.

    Mir was in use way past it's planned retirement date, and was the first true permenantly manned space station. A great deal of the ISS's design is based on the lessons (good and bad) learnt from Mir.

    3. Going to the moon was a competitive race. Going to Mars will be a collective journey.

    This isn't a road trip we're talking about. It's a voyage.

    NASA can't afford to go to Mars single-handed. Neither can ESA. And neither can the Russians. The only way this is going to get done soon is through cooperation.

    Yeah, cooperation. That dirty "c" word. Sometimes, you can't do everything yourself so you call in someone else, pooling resources and talent to get the job done as best as possible.

    Politically, economically and scientifically, there are many reasons why such an endeavour will be one of cooperation rather than competition. As much as anything else, a Mars mission will be used to foster closer relationships between the US, Europe and Russia.

    (And, before you mod this down as a troll, re-read what I've written. It makes sense. Which is more than can be said about many of the posts so far.)

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Why not be positive about this? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Caveat: Your fundamental point that the Russians rule utterly is well taken. They do indeed so rule. Look at the Trans-Siberian Railway, for Pete's sake. Makes the mighty Union Pacific look like HO.

      Anyway...

      NASA can't afford to go to Mars single-handed. Neither can ESA. And neither can the Russians. The only way this is going to get done soon is through cooperation.
      Yeah, cooperation. That dirty "c" word. Sometimes, you can't do everything yourself so you call in someone else, pooling resources and talent to get the job done as best as possible.


      Isn't the fact that no single nation on Earth can afford to develop a Mars mission a strong indication that it is massively impractical? Supposing it could be done, but it would take 5% of the world's GDP for 10 years. At what point do we say, "actually, never mind, let's check back in 2050 to see if it makes sense then"?

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  7. Go Russia! by JimPooley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's face it, the Russians have a major advantage over the Americans in this.
    They have the best expertise on not just the physical effects of long-term space flight, but they're also experts on the psychological effects of being cooped up in a big space can for a long time. You need to know all that for this trip.
    They're also the only nation with the big dumb boosters you need for a trip like this. Their hardware is pretty bulletproof as they use tried and trusted hardware rather than going for the most high-tech option.
    And at the moment Russia is the only nation on earth with manned spaceflight capability. All Shuttles are grounded, and who knows whether they'll ever fly again?

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  8. what a colossal waste of money by g4dget · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think sending people to Mars serves no purpose whatsoever. Whether it's $20 billion or $20 trillion, for the cost of sending 6 people to Mars, we could send probably a hundred unmanned one-way missions, or even several unmanned return missions. Those would yield much more scientific data.

    If, on the other hand, the goal is public relations and media coverage, then let the entertainment and media businesses pay for it.