Slashdot Mirror


Russian Sub Launches European Inflatable Space Vehicle

QueueEhGuy writes "From the 'Red Planet' meets 'Hunt for Red October' department: CNN is reporting in this article that the Russian navy launched an inflatable space reentry vehicle atop a standard ICBM. Although this one was evidently only 2.5 ft in diameter, they evidently plan on making larger versions to act as life rafts or carrier pigeons from space back to Earth. Apparently, neither Val Kilmer or Sean Connery were involved in the test."

4 of 36 comments (clear)

  1. I certainly hope... by tswinzig · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that we launched our nukes in retaliation.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  2. Inflatable Technology by LastToKnow · · Score: 4, Funny
  3. I FOUND IT... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can bid on the lost russian inflatable spacecraft by clicking here.

  4. The Runway problem... by cnelzie · · Score: 2, Funny


    Send a number of robotic contruction drones to the surface of Mars. Send them with BASIC construction materials and have them get the rest of the materials on the Martian surface. I am certain that some materials (Other than the limestone) could be found on the surface to make a concrete material.

    These drones could spend 24 hours a day completing the landing strip. Then send the first team of "colonists" to Mars. They could oversee the construction of a launching platform and fuel refinery systems.

    After that, a few more construction crews can be sent to Mars to build more suitable permanent habitats and regular colonists could arrive later. The kind that have scientific knowledge and know-how for making life on Mars work.

    After 50 or so years, then regular tourists and corporations can setup offices on Mars. Then another 50 or so years later, we can have that Mars-Terra conflict that is always talked about in science fiction novels.

    That would be fun...

    -.-

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?