Slashdot Mirror


Top 10 Things Wrong With Linux, Today

An anonymous coward sends in this link to a list of the top ten things wrong with Linux today. He's noting things that are "wrong" not with Linux per se, but with a user's experience with Linux; most of his points actually have to do with KDE/X. The KDE 3 bug he's talking about is a user-interface change in konqueror: form elements can be changed by mousing-over them and turning the scroll wheel, which is very bad. Hopefully the KDE guys will roll this change back to the previous behavior.

4 of 699 comments (clear)

  1. Linux can't be expected to work as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    as Windows XP. Microsoft is a massive company, they can afford to hire the smartest programmers. I think it is great that thousands of wheel chair bound programmers with typing wands lued to their head haev decided to code for linux. But we can't expect these people to be as good as MS programmers.

  2. Male dominated things will be ugly by dnoyeb · · Score: 0, Troll

    Who are the programmers and what are they concerned with? Mostly men. Just make it work. Form follows function, blah blah blah.

    If you wan't it to be beautiful or easy to use(ergonomics) find a woman.

    Woman coders who will not leave a project in such a state of ugliness. Who don't care if it works, but only that its beautiful.

    There must be balance in the force.

  3. Re:Not entirely true by DrXym · · Score: 1, Troll
    I truly don't understand why people *want* AA on apps. Maybe it's great when you're typesetting but in general it makes the screen like its out of focus.

    Mozilla 1.1 also does AA on Mac OS X and to be honest I reckon it looks better without it.

  4. Quibbles and bits by Skapare · · Score: 3, Troll
    • 1. No 'best' browser.

      So if one browser gets better, and then because of the pressure another gets better, too, this is bad? Maybe we should remove some features from one of them to make another look better? It's sad that we would have to downgrade the capability of something before we are able to make a choice.

    • 2. Prompting for a filesystem scan.

      I rewrote my rc/boot scripts myself from scratch. I haven't had this problem for 3 years.

    • 3. Printing needs to be easier to configure.

      We need better standards among printers. Much of the problem is due to so many different kinds of printers, different drivers, different data formats. One single standard is needed and vendors must be force to comply.

    • 4. Make it easy for the user to find out how to do things.

      I still haven't figured out how to do a number of things on my MS Windows 98 machine. For example, how do I tell Windows that my hardware clock runs as UTC and that it should still show me my local time.

    • 5. Cleaner redraws.

      This is more of a programming problem. Certain programmers think that they need to first erase the screen then rewrite it. Back before Linux, I wrote an editor for DOS, and I wrote my own screen window manager for it. The editor could simply open up window objects and update them much like curses, but simpler. When refresh was called, the screen was updated, but there was no flicker because it was never erased first. It simply updated everything, period. Parts that were changing content just changed. Parts that were not changing, didn't. And mine was so fast I could still do scrolling by full screen rewrites even on a 16 MHz machine.

    • 6. Die stray processes, die!

      Programming problem again. Teach programmers how to deal with the real world.

    • 7. Easy way of sharing files.

      Why do you want access to my files? Leave me alone.

    • 8. Sound support.

      Like printers, this is a vendor problem. Find vendors who do a better job of not always changing the driver-to-hardware interface, and favor them over the vendors that keep screwing people over with the next board version. There is no reason every piece of hardware needs to have its own driver disk included, even for MS Windows (and this is a big cause of many system problems in Windows, too ... Bill Gates has said so).

    • 9. No common editor which supports "soft wrapping."

      What you are asking for is to show text as if it had newlines, when in fact it has none. Maybe you should be writing HTML instead of plain ASCII text. Don't mail it to me w/o newlines. But if you want to be able to reformat a range of text, maybe you should try emacs.

    • 10. No easy way to configure X - especially change resolution on the fly.

      I just changed my resolution on the fly while entering this line of text by pressing the Ctrl-Alt-KeypadMinus combo. Then I pressed Ctrl-Alt-KeypadPlus to revert back.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars