House OKs Life Sentences For Hackers
ByteHog writes "The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly Monday to create a new punishment of life imprisonment for malicious computer hackers. The article on MSNBC also mentions that police can conduct internet or telephone eavesdropping without first obtaining a court order. Says a Rep from Texas: 'A mouse can be just as dangerous as a bullet or a bomb.'" Other articles can be found here and the text of the bill is available.
yeah... fuck you..
hey, no reading the article..respond irrationally to the freaking subject.
lots of secrets to hide...
you must have sick people living on the floor above you. hasn't it started stinking yet?
*salutes* *tips hat*
You're right, I didn't expect that. Well done.
--- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
And all you pro-Palestinians are making me sick with your foolish assumptions and brain-damaged rhetoric. How are Arabs more justified to dwell in those lands than the Jewish people who have been there for millennia? Israel holds that land by might (the six-day war) and right (by U.N. mandate). The only justification the "Palestinians" (Arabs) have to that land is based on the genocidal fury of a Roman emperor, who renamed it Palestine in an attempt to wipe Israel from the world and the map.
All people are free to settle in Israel, yet the Arabs wish to possess the whole land. Doesn't anyone remember what happened in 1967? They HAD the entire west bank and Gaza strip, but they wanted to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. Are those the kind of people you want to be associated with?
Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
This may seem off topic, but I'm going to post it anyway under anon. I wrote a paper for a graduate program I'm in on software liability. It is notoriously difficult to find examples of software liability where the courts have found guilt on the part of the negligent developers. Aren't programmers responsible for software related accidents just like physicians for malpractice? I found one case where the developers were found at fault from an incident involving radiation therapy software to control the amount of radiation that was distributed to the patient. Needless to say, it was an uppauling case. I found others where software companies responsible for downed airlines were not held responsible. How is this possible? What about mainstream software, how many countless billions of dollars are wasted every year from the result of buggy software? So I'm off topic, it's a rant.
Things aren't true just because you say them. Try doing research instead of believing whatever sounds good.
The FBI Uniform Crime Report documents that hate crimes are committed against almost every demographic slice of America you can think of. Hate-crime laws apply to attacks on white people just as on black people. I challenge you to find me a single law anywhere in the United States, enacted or proposed, that says that only black people shall be protected by hate-crime laws.
If you need an example instead of statistics, look to Ronald Taylor, a racist black man who shot two white people. He was arraigned not only for their murders but for "ethnic intimidation," Pennsylvania's equivalent of "hate crime."
If you want the statistics: Hate Crimes, 1995 (see table 2)
Specify that an existing ban on the "advertisement" of any device that is used primarily for surreptitious electronic surveillance applies to online ads. The prohibition now covers only a "newspaper, magazine, handbill or other publication." Yay, no more X-11 popups.