Slashdot Mirror


Contracts Contracts Contracts

An anonymous reader submits: "There's an article over at CNet about all those software contracts that are out there, and what to watch for before signing the dotted line. Using California's $95 million Oracle problem, they define what the general terms are that get used in software procurement and support contracts. While mostly geared at commercial software, one can use most of this article to target open source tech support contracts."

70 comments

  1. Can't sue open source by cdtoad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've discovered that most companies that I've "contracted" with won't use the open source suggestions I give them simply cuz they can't SUE someone if things go wrong. I also state in my contract that they can't sue me for anything other than bad programming and for them to prove that! Ha!

    --
    when they ban enctryption only criminals wi$21*J *#JF$%!@#$':
    1. Re:Can't sue open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think he meant for terms pertaining to tech support. ie, buying support services from Redhat

    2. Re:Can't sue open source by dattaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it really about suing someone? Those of us who have worked in large companies see large contracted project fiascos all the time. No one gets sued, but its interesting that those responsible for the decisions seem to defend the mistakes.

      Kickbacks? Were they wined and dined? Did they have a girlfriend involved that happened to have close ties to the contractors? I don't know. Marketing and managers have strange relationships and are often disjoint with the rest of the company. I'm sure stories of bad relationships between vendors would make for great movie material.

    3. Re:Can't sue open source by Nonesuch · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, it really is about suing somebody.

      In many cases, large consulting firms (KPMG, various SAP groups, etc) are brought in at vastly inflated lates to run a project, in part because they can serve as a scapegoat when the project comes in late and overbudget or fails in a spectacular fashion.

      This is a basically an insurance policy for upper management. Rather than firing the entire management team, one or two token IS directors are kicked free with a golden parachute, and the rest of the blame is directed at the outside contractors.

      The board and the shareholders see the huge damages in the lawsuit against the contractors, and this sleight of hand is enough to direct their ire away from the real culprits in upper management.

    4. Re:Can't sue open source by real_b0fh · · Score: -1

      yeah, and this behaviour is very smart, in fact as smart as the vast majority of managers out there.

      thats the reason why I always pretend to agree with all the bullshit they say, but implement everything like it should be implemented anyway ;-)

      I even get congrats after awhile, mind you. The best one is when I dropped Oracle or MSSQL (company standards) in favor of PostgreSQL for a project (ofcourse few knew it until it was up and running (too late, bwahhahaha)). Now I see the Oracle and MSSQL servers shitting themselves and my puny Pg servers doing just fine and laugh my ass off. Too bad I could not cash myself those $$$$ Oracle licenses :-P

      Believe or not, those dudes are even considering adding PostgreSQL to the "Standards". LOL.

      --
      "Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user friendly. It just happens to be selective on who it makes friendship with"
    5. Re:Can't sue open source by dattaway · · Score: 2

      This guy may have a -1 karma, but what he says seems to be important when considering one's career. I have been fortunate to work for managers before that have been hired within that have more than enough common sense to bring everyone together and work as a team to fight dumb ideas.

      Unfortunately, I now stand at a place where there are adventures of great magnitude. Every time I mention the wisdom of a decision, I know the person who is listening may use me as a reference. Slowly, I find the steps on the ladder weakening...

    6. Re:Can't sue open source by StormyMonday · · Score: 3

      I've had the same problem. It's totally bogus, of course:

      1. You're gonna sue Microsoft. Or IBM. Or CA. Right. Tell me another one.
      2. Go back and read your EULA. Basically, they warrant that the media is Genuine Media. If you happen to put the disk in a reader, and there happens to be some software on it, and if you happen to install it, you're on your own.

      Point this out, and the argument changes to another bogus anti- open source rant.

      --
      Welcome to the Turing Tarpit, where everything is possible but nothing interesting is easy.
    7. Re:Can't sue open source by Sunda666 · · Score: 1

      just be *pretty* sure on the decisions you make, and make the right ones (or the ones that approximate "right" the most), not like some dumbasses that call themselves management and make critical decisions based purely marketing hype (or worse - because "the market uses this" - argh) and you will be ok.

      the right tool for the job usually works - and well ;-)

      (btw, I am the original poster, but could not reply using that account because of the new /. troll policy - poor me, having to use this lame good-karma login :-P)

      cheers.

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    8. Re:Can't sue open source by dattaway · · Score: 2

      thanks, and don't hesitate to comment on something you feel is important. We'll stick up for anyone and defend your right to post and link to what speaks your mind.

    9. Re:Can't sue open source by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Open Source.
      When failure is not an option.

    10. Re:Can't sue open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, lawsuits happen all the time -- for custom software/hardware contacts. I've been on 3 projects where this has happened and only one had merit -- the other 2 were attempts at changing the terms of an existing contract that the customer decided they no longer liked. One is pending but only focused on ex-employee compensation, one was settled by a judge in ~10 minutes (he laughed at our customer and said "you used it then, you use it now, you've bought it -- pay up"), and the other was settled before going to court.

      That said I have not heard of a single COTS (commercial off the shelf) software product being sued by thier customers -- and that includes when I worked for 6 years at a small but popular company.

      The "need someone to sue" is usually for finger pointing purposes; if someone sues you it is good to know that there's another company in the chain. Yet, I have yet to see this used by anyone.

    11. Re:Can't sue open source by markmoss · · Score: 2

      This article was about when there is an actual signed contract between the corporation buying the software and the software vendor. Under those circumstances, it _might_ be possible to negotiate away the "We are not responsible for anything but putting the software on the CD" clause. However, in exchange the purchaser probably gives the vendor considerable control over the environment in which the software is run. No one can guarantee that software will run properly without knowing what computers it will run on, how they are configured, and what other software is installed on them.

      But if you really want to get Linux under a commercial-style contract, I'm sure you could find some vendor to sell you support for so many copies installed at such and such a site, on such and such computers, with a list of other programs approved to work with it - and they'll throw in install disks too... Then if they don't get the software working, you might be able to sue for breach of contract, unless the contract forbids this.

      I suspect you'll actually have an a better chance of persuading a small OSS vendor to write a contract that does provide penalties or allow breach-of-contract suits for nonperforming software. The reasons for this are both good and bad:

      1. Suppose it turns out that the only thing that will make all the programs the customer needs run together is a little code change in the operating system? It's hard to imagine MS changing Windows just for one customer, especially after they've already got your money, but people do write patches for Linux just because they want it, whether or not it ever gets into the official source tree. Satisfied customers don't sue.

      2. It's likely that a big, complicated lawsuit against an OSS support vendor cannot pay off, because the whole company isn't worth the legal expenses. You'd wind up owning the vendor, but owing the lawyers a lot more than the vendor is worth. OTOH, MSFT could pay $10 billion cash without blinking. It would take 10 years of legal wrangling before you got any of it, but there are many people who would be willing to gamble, even on a poorly-founded case. So MSFT will probably insist upon contract clauses severely limiting the damages you could ever recover...

    12. Re:Can't sue open source by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      I agree completely! I used to work for a Fortune 500 company that refused to use Open Source because there was nobody to sue. We (the people who wanted to use Open Source) kept pointing out that they'd been screwed several times by several proprietary vendors and had never sued any of them, and they kept ignoring us and refusing to allow Open Source. Any excuse to protect the Status Quo, no matter how bogus. We began to suspect the real reason they opposed Open Source is that no Open Source vendor ever bought them lunch.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  2. ft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    first ease

  3. not fp, but close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    wohooooooooooo

  4. Contracts? by dvanduzer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Developers! Developers! Developers!

    1. Re:Contracts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think you mean:
      "Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!
      Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!
      Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!
      Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!"
      (Steve Ballmer, 2000)
  5. first troll! by s4m7 · · Score: -1, Troll

    There is nothing new here. Big companies rip people off. Next thing you know, /. will be posting links to Cnet articles claiming that the sky is up and the ground is down.

    seriously, who is surprised that expensive software contracts have loopholes designed to screw the customer? it wasn't considered news when MS started doing it to their customers years ago.

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  6. The old saying still holds true... by DragonWyatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (when I think of the Oracle/Cali deal)...

    "A fool and his money are soon parted."

    --
    Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
    1. Re:The old saying still holds true... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      I don't think it had anything to do with being foolish. It was obvioulsy a political decision. Hey, it's no skin off your nose if it's someone elses money. In business, the people signing contracts usually have a financial stake in their company (stock options.) Getting the best deal affects their own personal financial outlook so they are more likely to be picky.

      This is a basic problem with government in general. If each congressperson was basically charged double the tax rate of the average citizen (for life, not just their term) they MAY be more likely to be fiscally responsible.

  7. Things To Watch For... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > There's an article over at CNet about all those software contracts that are out there, and what to watch for before signing the dotted line. Using California's $95 million Oracle problem, they define what the general terms are that get used in software procurement and support contracts."

    At least in California, the list of "things to watch for before the contract gets signed" is pretty short:

    1) A $25,000 campaign donation to the Governor's re-election fund.

  8. solutions... by skydude_20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    do you want the easy money out of contracts and the secret to avoiding bad contracts?
    sign below and I'll tell you.

    x__________________________

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
    1. Re:solutions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I signed on line, but whenever I scroll up or down, the line moves, but my signature stays there!

  9. BALLMER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I think we know the secrete here.
    Developers, developers, developers, developers.
    Developers, developers, developers, developers.
    Developers, developers, developers, developers.
    Wooooooohoooooooooooo!
    Woohoooohoooo !

    Steve "dancy party" Ballerm.

  10. Contracts Contracts Contracts by sheepab · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Wahoo, time to make a mockery of Steve Balmer.
    Developers, Developers, Developers.
    I was going to try and post the catchy two minute remix of the balmer video, but here is a nifty one instead. Mpeg here and Real media here.

  11. Do we need complex acronyms? by poopbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Credits: dmg

    Yet again the Linux so-called elite, backed up by their pseudo intellectual cohorts of the w3c conspire to ruin Linux's chances in the marketplace by sowing confusion and complexity. As someone with years of experience in the marketing world, I am constantly amazed at the willingness of the W3C and other bodies to pollute the acronym space with their content free "TLAs".

    Basic marketing 101 (and an undergrad course in psychology) would tell them that the normal person is only capable of remembering approximately 7 items of data in their short-term memory, but now we have to remember HTTP, HTML, XML, XSL, DTD, PHP, SSL, DSL, ADSL, ISDN, Perl, etc etc etc

    This is a text book example of the tail wagging the dog from a marketing perspective.

    I have been following the standardisation of the web for many many months now, but one thing has become clear, E-commerce will NEVER become popular so long as there are so many confusing acronyms involved. The guys in charge of marketing Linux absolutely MUST work to reduce the number of acronyms. One possible solution would be to merge those protocols which are not all that different. For example, why not merge XML with SGML ? (they could call it XSGML or SXGML or perhaps XMSGML), they seem to address the same problems. Or would that be too simplistic a solution for their pampered elitist ivy-league minds to comprehend ?

    If something is not done URGENTLY, and I mean URGENTLY, Linux (and other more experimental derivatives such as FreeBSD) can never hope to be taken seriously as an e-commerce platform by the people who count - the accountants.

    The miracle of Linux is that anyone actually runs it at all, considering one seems to require a masters in computer science to install it! (contrast this with NT4 which was so easy to install, we let our receptionist upgrade her own machine).

    As usual my "open source" advice is free. Hopefully this time my valuable advice will be taken into account the next time the w3c smell an acronym brewing.

    Finally, in conclusion, as an American, I am saddened that the Internet seems to have been commandeered by a European based protocol. Was America so short of talent we had to buy the HTML protocol from Tom Berners-Lee at CERN ?

    Think of the security implications of the worlds strongest economy, running an e-commerce protocol developed by a foreigner from Socialist Europe. Remember the wall has not been down for that long. Who knows what kind of trojans might be lurking within the depths of these complicated protocols.

    I am afraid I am behind Al Gore on this point, how can this be necessary in the home of smart corporations such as Microsoft and Intel ? The answer is the vast subsidies given by European socialist governments to fund development of the HTML specification.

    The solution is clear. The federal government should mandate and strongly subsidise the use of Microsoft software for all US corporations involved in e-commerce. Only with a US-developed set of protocols can we be assured of the security of our transactions.

    - posted by poopbot: because even your grandmother can use lunix

    X2U1qgOkne

  12. Verisign has optional service agreement by BoVLB · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to sign up for a Verisign test server certificate every two weeks. As part of this, I have to agree to a lengthy service agreement displayed in an editable TEXTAREA. Of course, I always delete the contract text before agreeing to it.

    1. Re:Verisign has optional service agreement by jeffy124 · · Score: 5, Funny

      oh that's too easy. you have to edit the contract such that they owe you cold cash for clicking "I agree." Oh and dont forget the clause requiring Verizon employees to bow to you when they pass you on the street, greeting you with "Oh great one"

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Verisign has optional service agreement by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      sorry. meant Verisign, not Verizon
      s/zo/sig/

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  13. Clause to watch out for by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Funny

    When perusing a software contract, beware any clauses containing language similar to this:

    Client agrees that all clients database are belong to us. You have no chance to appeal.

  14. Nintendo64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This is my favorite console!

  15. Contacts for Linxu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Guess what?

    When you give your shit away for free, a contract dont mean much!

  16. Contract Analysis by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, this is interesting.

    I was hired this summer by a large corporation (4,000+ employees and will otherwise go nameless) to do software cost analysis on their mainframe software. They hired me precisely for this reason: to analyze each contract and summarize their software license/maintenance costs for the current year and into the future.

    Thankfully, my company has been in business since the 1960's and are pros when it comes to language in the contracts. I mostly do work with mainframes, and I've found a few keys to look for:

    1. Hardware upgrades - Many companies will charge additional license fees for upgrades to mainframe CPU's (often in MIPS or MSU ratings)
    2. Maintenance - It is important to put some kind of "cap" on maintenance. A typical example: "maintenance shall not exceed the lesser of 15% of current license fee or 10% over the previous year." Also, it must be assumed that fees *WILL* increase the maxiumum allowable charge under the contract.
    3. Usage - In a large corporate setting, companies often must pay for the use of software on multiple sites or for use of partially owned, divested, or acquired entities.

    As you can see, the charges mount quickly. That's why it's essential only to run the software necessary, and nothing more.

    -Bullseye

  17. "The biggest danger is [that]... by bsDaemon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    a customer may buy version 2.0...then the vender says they're moving to version 3.0 and won't support 2.0 in the next 6 months"

    like that Win2k news last week?

  18. Should have Standardized EULAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    In several other industries, there are "standard contracts", and I think it is well past time that became the case in the Software Industry. A specific example is the Building/Construction industry. They have "AIA" (I forget what that stands for, but it should be easy to find) standard contracts that they can call on so everyone is on the same page. A very good idea.

    One reason I love Open Source software is that there are only a few licenses that I have to know about, and just by knowing the name of them, for example knowing something falls under the "GPL", or a "BSD" license, I know EXACTLY what to expect. This is of immense value to me as a user of software.

    I think that property should be more heavily emphasized by the Open Source industry.

    Frankly, I don't know why people put up with the EULA uncertainty and why the courts let Software companies take advantage of people in that fashion. They don't for most other products, heck even "media/content" products.

    Erich Boleyn
    erich@uruk.org

    1. Re:Should have Standardized EULAs by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      AIA stands for American Institute of Architects, who wrote those basic contracts.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  19. Business business business by zoftie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Businesses will try to screw others out of dollars most effective ways. Given that horizon for most software companies life expectancy is around 1-2 years(IMHO) the faster you collect money in the beginning of life cycle, the more likely you are going to survive later, nevermind those pesky customers. You can tell them damn lies, lies and more lies, but if your bank is empty, you have no business.
    2c.

  20. What was that line again? by drew_kime · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's not about the purchase price, it's the total cost of ownership that's important. Right? Right?
    Stephen Davidson, an attorney and chairman of the intellectual property and information technology law department at Minneapolis-based Leonard Street and Deinard, cited one case in which a company temporarily used licensed software on a computer that was more powerful than noted in the contract. That put the customer at risk of triggering an expansion charge of nearly $1 million and a threat that the license agreement would be terminated if the fee was not paid.
    That's the thing you'll never see with OSS. At worst, you'll lost the support contract, but the software will always be yours.
    --
    Nope, no sig
  21. The fool... by Catskul · · Score: 2

    Since it was a government contract, the money belonged to the taxpayers of California... Am I to intrepret your post as a knock on Californians ?

    : ) Good Job !
    (j/k)

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:The fool... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > > [...a fool and his money are soon parted]
      >
      >Since it was a government contract, the money belonged to the taxpayers of California... Am I to intrepret your post as a knock on Californians ?

      I'm not gonna speak for the original poster, but consider what Californyuh's facing.

      $23B deficit, budget at an impasse (to be fixed using Enronesque off-balance-sheet financing tricks that won't show up in higher taxes until after the election), mismanaged power crisis, highly questionable Oracle deal, pay-for-play legislation for pipefitters unions (in exchange for campaign donations, banning PVC pipe because it's cheaper to install than metal, which the pipefitters oppose) and prison guards' unions (similar exchange: give campaign funds, get favorable legislation).

      Dot-com implosion started in 2000. Last time I looked, this was 2002. Anyone here not able to guess that capital gains taxes would drop precipitously, resulting in a drop in state revenues? Yet spending is up, year-over-year, by a rate far over that of inflation. Up 20% this year alone. Oh, right. This is CA, where only budget that matters is the campaign budget.

      Yet Davis still leads in the polls. So yeah, it looks like a taxpayer and his money are easily parted.

      But I'll be charitable and withhold judgement until after the elections.

    2. Re:The fool... by Dynedain · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ummm....the pvc banning isn't just a union thing

      My house was built with (illegal in our county) internal pvc supply lines about 15 years ago.

      Last August a pipe broke and flooded two rooms, destroyed wallpaper, drywall, etc...

      Copper pipes would not have had a problem.

      And Davis leading the polls....look who his opponent is (Bill Simon). Needless to say if Reirden had won the primaries, Davis would be falling fast.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    3. Re:The fool... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      It's not just a california problem, most ALL federal, state, and local governments have the same basic problem. Once a new program is started, it basically never ends. Agencies never have to justify existing spending, only NEW spending (and not even detailed at that.) What needs to happen is for government to look at Each and Every office, person, program, and for agency directors to justify every penny spent and justify the continuation of the program on an annual basis. Make them criminally liable for thier numbers much like congress wants to do for CEO's of companies.

      Government spending could probably be cut 70% if we did this.

  22. What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We comb through each word of every contract to make sure that the definitions that we think we agree to are the ones that are written into the document. It is worth the extra time and money to avoid getting jewed by the other party." said Stephen Weinberg, CTO of Dimension Securities.

    I realize that the man is probably Jewish, and that he works in an industry that this type of language is the norm, but holy cow, does CNet have to print it?

    It's bad enough that such epithets exist and are used, but does the man have to slander his own race by using the term? It's like black people who have struggled to gain acceptance in society and transcend racial stereotypes calling each other 'nigger'. It's sad.

    Maybe it's just the paternalistic white man in me that's struck by how backwards the use of these terms is. Maybe my sensibilities are too high. In any case, I guess the only thing I can do is avoid using these words altogether.

    1. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Shut up, you commie jew.

    2. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Nah, if he were jewish, he would be Anonymous Cowardstein.

      Sorry. (:

    3. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i m not a registered user just someone browsing the net and found this site but...

      whats wrong with an existing word that has entered the dictionary as a term?
      reaganism .. is that bad? it means supply side economics
      thatcherism .. this too? sell the entire public sector
      jew .. greedy miser who wants his pound of flesh .. go read shakespear's merchant of venice

      and to that jew who used the word .. i admire his honesty and realism and teh thin is .. he probably isnt a greedy miser .. just smart

    4. Re:What?? by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      Reaganism is not called "Actorism", and
      Thatcherism is not British-womanism. So
      by your analogy the proper verb should
      be shylock, not jew, eh

      --

      Considered harmful.
    5. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The definitions of words are typically earned.

      We may not like it, and the earning may have deep roots in misunderstanding between xenophobic peoples that we call our ancestors, but like it or not, the meaning came before the word.

    6. Re:What?? by dhclab49 · · Score: 1

      Wait a sec -- I don't see that in the CNET article? Where did you get that?

  23. I fail to Understand by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

    The only point of a software contract tends to be to put the balance of power in the vendor's, not the customers, favor. How often does a vendor include guaranteed reliability, and free from bugs, with free updates? Compare that with EULA agreements that preclude them from taking any responsibility for the problems that their software may have. I'll admit that software is new and does not have completely solid fundementals, but be able to claim that they have no responsibility to their customer also means that they have no respect for them either.

    1. Re:I fail to Understand by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* How often does a vendor include guaranteed reliability, and free from bugs, with free updates? *)

      Promise the impossible?

      I will tell you what, show me one vendor that has done that and kept costs reasonable. If out of a million vendors, not a single one has done such, then it is probably not technically feasible. (I heard the Japanese tried it, but it took too long to get right.)

      (* I'll admit that software is new and does not have completely solid fundementals, but be able to claim that they have no responsibility to their customer also means that they have no respect for them either. *)

      What is this "respect" crap? It is a dog-eat-dog world and always will be. Soviets fought in a political arena (he who kisses up best waits least in lines), and capitalists fight in an economic and political arena.

      Either prove your dream world exists, or stop dreaming.

    2. Re:I fail to Understand by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Either prove your dream world exists... *)

      Should be:

      Either prove your dream world can exist, or stop dreaming out loud.

  24. I look forward to the day by Bobtree · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when there are standardized EULA's for proprietary software. Free software is way ahead of the game here. Sooner or later, users will demand something reasonable from the proprietary majority as well. Someday I hope something akin to a software users' bill of rights lets us all sleep better at night.

  25. [Horny Smurf] Incest Incest Incest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Wendy had began to live a much more fun life since her mother had gotten re-married. Now she was allowed to stay home from school much more often and stay up later. Also her Aunty Jamie came over much more, she was a gorgeous women just a year older then her mom, with brown hair and small but perky breast, that always called Wendy by different names. She received a much larger allowance then she used to get as well, because her new dad was rich to boot.
    Along with these changes also came more sexual changes. One example was her mom and dad bought her a see through blue robe to wear around the house and she was often encouraged to where it with out her bra and panties. Also her new dad touched her a lot more then her old dad used to and in more exciting places. Often he would rub her pretty breasts and pat her round pale ass.
    "Your pubic hair is coming in nicely," he'd say and rub it. She had to admit that her little patch had come in nicely, it was only a little redder then her short red hair. Mary liked the attention and her mom said she was glad they got along so well. Indeed her mom, Jena, had changed a lot since marrying Richard, she was a beautiful women and still rather young, indeed she had Wendy when she was only fourteen, now she seemed to like to flaunt this fact, she wore tighter clothing, some times no at all around the house. She was tall and had blonde hair, the only one in her family, with large and firm tits.
    Another new thing was that she got to watch porno videos, and she got to watch Richard and her mom have sex. She was also aloud to play with herself were ever she wanted, and often did at the diner table. She loved rubbing her clit, once her daddy showed her were it was, but she never put more then one finger in herself, and never deep because it hurt, even though she saw her mom take five fingers all the way, and plus Richard's large shaft.
    Mary was told that this was because of her cherry and that it would have to be popped before she could really have sex. Often Mary wished that some one would pop it for her so she could start doing what she saw them do. Jena said that this was done by some one putting there dick in her little cunny, as they called it.
    Wendy immediately wished Richard could do it, but that was the one thing she couldn't do. Were as Richard touched her all the time her mom got mad if he got his dick involved. Wendy felt it wasn't fair to her that her mom could put it in her mouth and her cunny, and she wasn't even allowed to jack it off.
    Today Richard had let her touch it but then her mom came in as she almost got it in her mouth and Jena pulled her off and spanked her bare ass. However to make her feel better she was allowed to watch as her mom sucked on it and Richard blow his load all over her face. Then they went in the bed room and locked the door leaving Wendy to rub her clit and watch porno.
    This was another strange subject in Wendy's house, the bed room door locking. Wendy was dieing to know what they did in there. Often Aunty Jamie would come over and join them. Wendy first thought they had sex in there, when it was her old dad, but now she was allowed to watch Richard and her mom, and Richard and her Aunty Jamie have sex, so she had no idea what they were hiding.
    She sat there puzzling this out and watching a porno were some dump blonde bimbo was having cum sprayed on her face and rubbing her wet clit fiercely. She was having trouble getting in the mood for an orgasm when her Aunty Jena walked in. "Oh hi Aunty," She said still fiercely pressing her little button.
    "Hi Sweety," Jena said in a throaty feminine voice, Wendy loved her voice," Where're your parents, Love?" But before Wendy could answer Jena let out a hi pitched scream of pleasure. Jamie sat down on the sofa then. "Well they're in there again," She said to herself.
    She raised up her skirt to display a beautiful pussy, with a tuft of ginger hair. "Do you mind if I join you?" She asked the still masturbating thirteen year old.
    "No problem," Wendy replied and the added. "Do you want something to drink?" She stopped working her clit and went to get up.
    "Oh don't worry about me, go ahead and get off first." Jamie had three fingers working her pussy and was already very wet.
    "It's okay," Wendy said down heartedly.
    "Well what ever is the matter, Wendy dear," Jamie she patted the sofa and said, "lay down and tell Aunty Jena all about it,"
    The naked thirteen year old slid next to her Aunty Jamie and snuggled her head against her shoulder. Jamie still rubbed her own clit but much slower so she could pay attention to he depressed niece.
    "Well its just that I want to now what you all do in there, and why I can't join in," She was about to tear up. "I can't get my little cunny going I'm thinking about it so hard."
    "Today is your lucky day then, Sweet thing, cause i came over hear to talk to your mother about just that. Also i happened to bring something that will help you cum really good." Jamie hoped up and lead Wendy to the high marble bar that divided the kitchen from the living room. She lifted the slender teen up on the bar and Wendy winched as the cold surface touched her bottom. She watched as Jamie pulled a hot pink rod from her purse.
    "What's that?" Wendy asked excited, she hadn't cum for hours and she was a little on edge.
    "This, Sugarpussy, is a vibrator." She twisted the black end and the thing started vibrating as the name implied. "Open your legs, Hornyangel, and let me see your little cunt." Wendy did. "Now spear your little lips open and get your clit sticking out."
    Wendy spread he lips with one hand and then with the other got her clit standing in seconds. Then her Aunty Jamie pressed the vibrator right against her hard little nub. Wendy gasped and had to put her hands behind her to hold herself up. She started moaning then. Her pussy was sending an electrical charge through her body and she was almost ready to cum. "More aunty, more please."
    "Any thing you want Honeycunt," and Jamie pressed it harder to her to her pussy. She moved it up and down the little slit and around her puffy little lips the back on her clit. After a moment Wendy shivered and her pussy flooded sweet little girl nectar and quivered. She had a mind blowing orgasm.
    After a second she hugged her aunt and was helped down. A lot of her cum was on the counter top now. "You run and take a shower, now and I'll clean all this up," Jamie swatted her round ass as she left. Jamie then licked up the sweet cum and salty sweat.
    She had just finished up as Jena and Richard came from their bedroom naked. "Jamie what a surprise," Jena said, as she walked up and kissed her. "I thought you wouldn't be by today."
    Jamie looked at her naked sister and stroked down her breast. "What and miss the first day of little Wendy's summer break. She's showering by the way." Then she grabbed Richards cock and jerked it a bit. "I see your happy to see me as well,"
    "Richard is on his way out to get some ice-cream and some more batteries, his in some trouble." Jamie kissed him and her pussy on his cock before he went to get dressed.
    As he left, sat chatting in the kitchen. "So what did he do, to earn your scorn, Love?" Jamie had removed her blouse and sat as nude as her sister.
    "He almost had Wendy giving him head, I got so made I spanked her," Jena sounded like she felt guilty and Jamie stood up and began rubbing her shoulders.
    "Can you blame him, Jena. He has as much right to fuck that girl as he has to fuck you. We should have done it her after your wedding night, but you wanted to wait and i understand." Jamie slid onto Jena's lap and kissed her as she stroked her nibble. "She hadn't been round as much sex as we had when mom and dad first fucked us. But now she has and its time to carry on the family tradition, to bad Oscar freaked out when you told him about the tradition," Jamie sighed "It really should be her father that pops her cherry, but oh well,"
    Jena stroked her sisters wet cunt as she spoke, "I know its a tradition, but I didn't like it at first when i got fucked. What if she doesn't and freaks out,"
    "Trust me, Sis, that little twat, isn't going to freak, she wants it so bad. In fact if we don't do this soon then she might pop her own cherry and we wouldn't want that, would we?" She twisted her finger on Jena's light pink nipple.
    "No," Jamie said in a small voice, she was putty to her big sister.
    "And you learned to like the why dad's cock filled you up didn't you?"
    "Yes"
    "You know Richard wants it, you know I want it you know Wendy wants it, and you really know," she gave her sisters nipple a mean twist "that you want it," Jamie ground he body against her naked sisters equally naked body, for a moment then got off her.
    Just then Wendy came in the room. She sat down, probed her feet up on the table and started to rub cunt with a spoon. "Goodness, love are you horny again," Jamie asked. "Jena love she fingers her pussy almost more then you do. She'll set a record soon."
    "Aunty Jamie," Wendy asked as she spoon the cum ladder spoon her mouth, "May i please use your vibrator again," she saw her mom winch as she asked.
    "Of course, Littleslut, but bring it in here so I can make sure you do it right." as she ran to get it Jamie said to her sister, "Don't worry i just buzzed her clit a little, nothing more." the last seemed to annoy her and Jena didn't miss that.
    "Fine, well do it when Richard gets back," Jena said. She was troubled about fucking her daughter but she was also turned on.
    "Do what mom?" Wendy asked as she came in the room.
    "To night Aunty Jamie, daddy and i are going to let you in the bed room, with the door locked, how does that sound." Jena bent down to look her daughter in the eyes, she seemed really excited. Jena knew she would have fun, and hoped that she wouldn't be to disappointed. Really they only used the bed room when they were having anal sex, or Jamie and Jena had girl sex with each other. Tonight however she would be licking her daughters pussy and ass instead of her sisters, and her husband would be opening the little girls cunt and anus. Jena listened to her daughter buzz her clit and watched as Jamie stared in plain lust.
    Jena remember her first time being invited into her parents bedroom. She had been around Wendy's age and had been allowed pornos as well, and run naked and finger herself, but it had still caught her by surprise. Her mom and her sister had to hold her legs open so her father could get a clear should. She begged and cried a lot but and screamed as her fathers dick slammed into her virgin pussy. After a time her shot a load deep in to his daughter and then said "That wasn't so bad was it," Then Jamie and her mother turned her over and she liked her moms pussy, as Jamie licked her ass. Then the time came and she felt the cock replace her big sisters tongue and that virginity was taken next.
    She looked back fondly now but then she had cried for a week until after many nights of forced sex she began to look forward to it. Jena was glad they did what they did to her now because she felt opened to the world of sex. She had lots of boy and girl partners after that at least until she got pregnant.
    While she would teach there daughter about condoms, and they did touch her more so this wouldn't be as surprising. Actually Jena couldn't think of a single reason why she wanted to deny her daughter that world of sexual gratification.
    Richard came home and Jena snapped out of her memories, as Wendy ran up and jumped in his arms, she was small for her age. "Guess what Daddy, Mom said i get to go to the bedroom with you and her and Aunty Jamie tonight."
    He looked to his wife and asked "Really Dear."
    "Yep, lead the way." Jena fallowed him and her sister to the bed room.
    Richard tossed the girl on the big bed and started stripping. He uncovered his eight inch cock and Jamie came up behind him and started stroking him. Wendy watched and was beginning to fill a little let down. "Is this it? I can see Jamie and Richard fuck any time i want,"
    Jamie looked at her daughter and touched her pussy for the first time since her patch came in. Wendy jumped as her mom's finger touched her clit and began to work with it. "Mom," She moaned "What are you doing?"
    "When we're in her it's Jena, Richard is called Daddy." She pinched her clit and as punishment. "After tonight well be doing a lot more things, Daddy, Jamie and can fuck you from now on, okay and you can't say no. It's are right," She told Wendy what her mother had told her.
    Wendy was amazed, "I get to fuck Daddy?" she was amazed, "That's great, but how do I fuck you and Aunty Jamie, you're girls."
    "Like this Wendy," she pushed a finger into her daughter, careful not to be to rough, her cherry was Richard's to take. She went down on her own daughter. She licker the aroused thirteen year olds cunt and sucked hard on her little clitoris. She liked around the lips and then shoved her tongue in the hole. This tasted great, she wished she had eating Wendy years ago. Well at least tonight she would fix all that and from now on her daughters pussy would be her delight every night.
    "Your making me cum Jena, don't stop don't stop Mom," Wendy was nearing climax and slipped, and Jamie slapped her face.
    "It's Jena tonight, Hornyslut." then she kissed her, this time with her tongue. It was a deep and lusty kiss.
    "Well you eat my pussy next Aunty Jamie? and call me a slut more it gets me so hot." she asked in a small voice.
    "Of course My little Sluttytwat," Jamie began kissing her nieces neck and then her tits. She wanted to kiss these little girl tits forever. She rolled tem between her teeth and then and Wendy moaned more.
    Suddenly she arched her back as Jena shove her tongue in her little girl's anus. Wendy hadn't expected that, in fact she only played with her pussy, but not from now on. Her mom returned to tonguing her clit and slid a finger in Wendy's asshole instead. That was more then Wendy couldn't take any more and her little virgin cunt exploded. Her sweet virgin girl juice flowed down her pussy on to her ass.
    "My turn," Richard said. He couldn't wait to get his cock into his underage step daughters tight cunt. "Talk dirty to me Sweetheart, tell Daddy how much you want his Cock,"
    Wendy had done this before earlier today just before she almost sucked him off. "Oh yes Daddy I want you thick cock in my tight cunt hole, your little girl needs your cum in her pussy, please," there was no faking in her words.
    Jena and Jamie spread Wends legs wide for Richard. He was ready, from now on his cock would be buried into her all the time. Her virgin cunt first then her tight butt hole, he wanted to fuck her all the time.
    He pressed his dick against her tight wet, pink slit as her aunt and her mother sucked her thirteen year old tities. He slammed it in and Wendy screamed in pain as her pussy was opened by her daddy's cock, her first cock. Jamie and Jena held down her shoulders as she fought and then hr pain became pleasure and her pussy was lighting up her body.
    "Make me cum again Daddy. Fuck my tight cunny, fuck my pussy Daddy, I need it. Your little girl needs your cum in her pussy," her dirty words and his pounding cock put her at her second orgasm in a minute. Richard tensed and the blow a deep hot load of cum into his thirteen year old daughters previously virgin cunt.
    There wasn't a pause for Wendy as her aunt Jamie dove between her legs and started liking the now open cunt. She tasted male sperm, little girls cum and fresh maidens blood. "Wait Aunty Jamie, I can take another one," Wendy pleaded.
    "To bad," Jamie moaned as she nibbled the hyper-sensitive little clit. Wendy was painfully arouse Jena put her pussy to Wendy's mouth, "Go ahead dear eat you mommy's cunt," Jena said. Richard slapped her for the slip up, Wendy though it was fair and then tasted her first pussy.
    She liked the hole a lot tasting her mothers cum as she had been tasted. Then she licked the swollen lips and sucked the clit as had been sucked. "Your a good girl, Wendy, your a good little slut. Your my good little slut." Wendy got a naughty idea and shoved two fingers in Jena's ass. Wendy wanted to lick it next.
    Wendy was on the having a wave of orgasms and she didn't think her pussy could take any more a her as Aunty Jamie touch her clit between her teeth and tormented it with her tongue. Since turning eight teen Jamie had licked only one other underage hole, her neighbor girl had spent the night and she helped the girl deal with her lesbian feeling. She was loving the mix of flavors she found in Wendy's cunt.
    Jena screamed and her pussy gushed all over her daughters sweet face. That marked Wendy's hardest cum yet and Jamie's satisfied tongue. Wendy was in a post orgasm haze as her aunt and mom rolled he on her stomach. Her face was placed between her Aunty Jamie's legs and she started to tongue her hole. Jamie pressed the girls face to her cunt burying her nose in the folds. Wendy now love the smell of an aroused women, and she liked at her aunty's cunt as Jamie stroked her hair and looked at her lovingly.
    Her mother now spread her ass cheeks and started to rub the stray girl cum around the tight asshole. Wendy like the way her ass was treated. Jena said "Hold tight, Baby, this will hurt but the it well feel so good."
    Suddenly Richards large cock plunged in to the virgin underage anus, of his daughter. Jamie screamed as Wendy bite down on her vulva. Richard ripped his little girls anus but he keep pounding away the pain was like a hot rod in Wendy's tight hole. But it turned to pleasure and she unclenched her teeth on her Aunt's vulva. She licked and tasted blood from her aunts cunt. Soon though Jamie was beyond pain as the little girl eagerly licked her sore pussy to a strong climax. For the second time Richard filled the little girl with cum, this time in and on her ass. Every one collapsed from exhaustion. Richard didn't even bother to pull out of his daughters anus.
    Hours later they sat in the living room. Wendy was on her knees with Richard's cock in her mouth. Her face was covered in her mom and aunts cum and Richard just added to it as he shot hot cum on his little girls face. It made her pretty thirteen year old face even prettier.
    "Thank you Daddy," she said as she moved to lick her mothers pussy.

    1. Re:[Horny Smurf] Incest Incest Incest! by hvatum · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Can this type of thing be blocked from slashdot?

      --
      Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    2. Re:[Horny Smurf] Incest Incest Incest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Unwanted arousal sure is frustrating, isn't it?

  26. Seems they got 'Perpetual' wrong by PotatoHead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article states that a perpetual software license means that you can use it for the life of the product provided that you continue to pay the contract fees.

    As I understand things, a perpetual license really means that once the software is licensed in a particular way, you can go on using it as long as you want. You will run out of support for it after your contract term is up, but you can still make use of the software.

    I have run across this type of license often. It is tied to a hardware component, dongle, or (rarely) a particular site. I have fixed many an older machine just for the use of the software licenses attached to it. The contracts clearly stated the word 'perpetual' when defining the license.

    In many cases, a physical device is used in combination with FlexLM to provide the license functionality. If you do fail to pay your fees and want to move the license, many companies will either require you to purchase a new license (at the current version) or pay all back fees to get a new license key for the version that was in use.

    Anyone else think this definition is bogus, or was I misunderstanding what I was seeing?

    This type of experience was one of the primary motivators for me to begin exploring OSS for my computing needs.

    If you can learn to compile and use Open Source software, then you are set for life.

    1. Re:Seems they got 'Perpetual' wrong by phriedom · · Score: 1

      I've seen "perpetual" licenses exactly how you describe them. We "own" it, but it is tied to a particular machine. You have to pay "maintainance" if you want updates, support, or to move the license to a new server. If you have let your maintainance lapse, you have to pay back maintainance, plus a penalty, in order to get current. If you let the maintainace lapse for more than 3 years, it is cheaper to buy a new license than it is to pay back maintainace on the old license.

      I have never seen perpetual licenses like the article describes.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    2. Re:Seems they got 'Perpetual' wrong by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      Good, then they got it wrong then, or that little mistake is a bit of 'spin' to get people to change their notion of just what a perpetual license is.

      Not that I like these sort of license schemes because I don't.

      I do however prefer the perpetual I remember over the one they are pitching in that article.

  27. Contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's all well and good to bitch at contracts that favour vendors but wait until you've left the cosy world of employment and created a startup. I was a lawyer for years working for startup companies and getting beat up in long negotiations with big players who understood nothing other than the fact they were big. All these "musts" for customers ignore the economic balance that must be worked out in every end user/supplier relationship depending on the cost of the software, the size of the startup, etc. A startup can be destroyed and I'm talking about companies that make millions per year.

    I'd love to see the article written from the other perspective, for instance end users who never end up paying for their software because they refuse to complete acceptance testing though they continue to use the software. There's one you need a lawyer to avoid. The concept of repaying the whole value of the software for maintenance issues is crazy. If need be, you use a service level agreement that sets out reasonable goals and at maximum, proportional rebates on maintenance and support fees paid for the period of time the problem occurs.

    And the concept that maintenance and support should continue on forever has sunk many a poor company, tying up valuable resources when they should be working on the next product.

    1. Re:Contracts by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I'm with you in my experience on any decent sized contract its usually the smaller company that gets nailed.

  28. Re:Verisign's optional^H^H^H^H editable agreement by libertarian · · Score: 1

    Hee Hee!! That made me laugh out loud!

    "Hereforth we, the company, will send to the customer 12 beautiful virginal massage therapists, daily, along with as much pizza and beer as required by the customer..."

  29. Why do I feel dirty... by mrdogi · · Score: 1

    for just having read about the possible licensing issues?

  30. GPL by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2

    Of course, I always delete the contract text before agreeing to it.

    An alternative with possibly interesting legal implications, paste the GPL (or any alternative licence/contract) into the testarea and submit.

    Since there are apparently no server side validation, it could be readily argued that they have accepted your change of terms.

    I wonder what the legal implications of this would be ?

    1. Re:GPL by BoVLB · · Score: 1
      paste the GPL (or any alternative licence/contract) into the testarea and submit

      Unfortunately this is a service agreement; I'm not aware of an FSF licence for that. Even if it were software, I couldn't meaningfully agree to distribute the binary only with source code if I don't have the source code.

  31. more Re:Should have Standardized EULAs by leuk_he · · Score: 2

    there are many more open source licences.

    And things get more complicated if some software is dual licenced or use an license that is incompatible wit other licences.

    And this kind of thing might me important if you do support on some product.

    If it was this simple why do people start flame fests here all the time over GPL and other licences.

  32. Same old problem - Vendor Spin by gavinjolly · · Score: 1

    I am starting to see this more and more. The process for implementing a business application seems to be:

    • Get sold on a product by a vendor
    • Convince everyone else in-house it will do the job
    • Make your business processes fit the product
    • Put up with a solution that meets 50-70% of your actual Business requirements.

    I have recently seen the model for one organisation where the technical solution is located WELL below the Leadership and other management and workflow processes.They actually implemented a solution to . . . here it comes . . meet their actual needs.

    Why is it so hard to get management to see the benefits of proper process in implementing a proper solution?

    --

    The weathers here - Wish you were beautiful

  33. esr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having recently read "The Cathedral and the Bazaar", I must note that all of these problems pointed out in the article are the same problems ESR noted about closed-source solutions in his essays.

    1) How does one price software, since it can be easily copied? You can't, because its not a logical pricing scheme.

    2) Support is a big portion of the contract, which is where open source vendors cash in.

    3) Customers complain about upgrade schedules and how they set up to use version 2, then are forced to use version 3 and readapt. The customers are at Oracle's mercy!

    I think this reporter should read ESR's work, and this would all make sense.

  34. English translation of most software licenses by Snake · · Score: 2, Funny
    Source: http://www.waynerad.com/work.html
    (I also remenber seeing it posted once on Slashdot by AC)

    Hello, end-user vermin. Here's some software. It might work. It might not. No gurantees and in fact, we have no responsibility even if it fries your hardware, scrambles your hard drive, blows up your monitor, messes up your credit report, and gets you indicted for tax fraud with the IRS. You however, have no rights at all, peon. You will use the software EXACTLY as we graciously permit you to. Period. Any unauthorized use, regardless of wheather permitted by other laws is (thanks to our lobbying efforts), not just a minor civil violation, but a federal criminal felony. Ha! You agree to waiving all other "fair use" and other rights including constitutional rights and "inalienable" human rights by accepting this EULA. And we might change our minds about what you can do and you agree to that too. We might even decide to scan your hard drive and monitor your network traffic and secretly report that info back to anyone we wish, and without telling you. You, of course, agree to this too. But don't even bother to complain. You should be thrilled we're letting you do anything at all with our product. And if you don't swear blood oath, full compliance with this license, then FUCK YOU and your little dog Toto too and get this software the hell off your computer and destroy the disk. Oh, and if you don't agree, you can't even refund the software, thanks to omnipotent software store policies. Tee-hee! Thnaks for the cash. l00z3rZ! HA Ha ha .......
  35. Software Assurance by cifey · · Score: 1

    The article has a link to new microsft contracting scheme. http://news.com.com/2100-1001-919097.html Microsoft seems to be quite an arrogant vendor, in the long run could help some of the other guys gain some market share.

    --
    Hello Cruel World