Slashdot Mirror


Light-Emitting Polymer Displays

BlackSol writes "Yahoo is covering a very cool piece on the development of roll-up screens. Possible uses from home televisions, to tele-watches, and military uses such as real-time satalite fed maps in the field."

34 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Multi-layer tv? by Ignavus+Anonymous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will this open the possibility for 3D tv using multiple transparant layers?

    Or perhaps the multi-channel edition where you have a book with 100 pages: every page is another chanel. Nice and convenient during the commecial breaks :)

    --

    --

    1. Re:Multi-layer tv? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why go through the extra expense and trouble of having 100 pages of channels when you could just have one page and change channels by pressing a button?

  2. Here's a good idea by HiQ · · Score: 4, Funny

    "People are talking about weaving displays into clothing. Will there ever be a mass market for that? I doubt it. But it will probably be seized on by someone."
    Well, as long as it's a touch screen, I'm happy :)
    {and slowly a song from the Who sets in: See me, feel me, touch me...}

  3. More info anyone? by Zordok · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here's their website: http://www.cdtltd.co.uk/

    I wonder if these can get high enough res. to be useful for laptop/handheld displays? That would sure be handy...

    -Zordok

  4. The uses.... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 3, Funny

    There are many uses for this in areas with political instability. Now instead of having to go through the problem of making new flags and banners every time an area changes hands, you can just have one of these up each flag pole, and just change the image as the situation warrents. I can see applications for this on the west bank / parts of Africa already.

  5. Adaptive Camo, anyone? by CommieLib · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Weave this bad boy into a full body suit, mount micro cameras throughout, project the image seen behind.

    Voila! Predator. From twenty feet or so, anyway.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by Myco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, no. Well, it depends how good of camo you're talking about. What I'd like to believe is that technology like this can create a true "stealth suit" which creates a duplicate image of whatever's on the other side, effectively making the wearer invisible. But keep in mind, this is still a 2D display and you can't project a different image to viewers at different viewing angles. Not yet, anyway. Maybe eventually. The other big obstacle to this approach (microcameras, etc.) is that the shape of the suit would change as the wearer moves. So you need unprecedentedly high-res, low-latency motion tracking for every point on the wearer's body.

    2. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by jhines0042 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The main problem with this is that you would have to blend in from all angles....

      If you were just worried about the frontal side or if you were in a very repeating field of grass or something similarly "bland" then there would be greater effect. Probably would be better than regular camo.

      But a man standing up in clearing is just as likely to be seen if he is projecting his own background as if he were wearing camo.

      And lets not forget shadows....

      Now if you wanted to have camo that would determine a good set of colors to be based on the surrounding average colors... THAT is probably easy and probably even better than trying to project the exact image of what is around you.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  6. Paper maps can be good, too by dave_mcmillen · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . military uses such as real-time satellite fed maps in the field.

    Better make sure those satellite connections are really secure:

    "All right, men, the enemy stronghold is dead ahead. Charge!"

    [ten minutes later] "Uh, Sarge, we must have gotten turned around somehow, now it's directly behind us."

    [fifteen minutes later] "Now it's saying we're in South-Central L.A. Stick together, men."

  7. Many interesting applications... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...for this technology.

    Cheap HUDs for autos (Heads Up Display) and bike helmets is an obvious application.

    Televisions everywhere. (Okay, this could really suck; who wants to see ads for Cheer everywhere you go.)

    And the big one: Wrap-around, full vision wearble displays. Granted, I'm stretching here, but one can dream, eh?

    If this technology really works well, it could solve a great many problems associated with computer displays (size, heat generation, cost, etc.)

    Lot's of really cool technology coming soon, makes the current despond somewhat more tolerable.

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  8. Welcome to the Diamond Age by Myco · · Score: 5, Insightful
    No mass-market for these screens on clothing? Hmm. Show of hands, who has read Niel Stephenson's _The Diamond Age_, with its vision of a future immersed in nanotechnology, and especially in a pervasive atmosphere of ever-changing displays (mostly ads) on damn near every surface.

    Imagine seeing a cityscape where every inch of every skyscraper is a billboard. Sound far-fetched? Read the article -- this is about printing televisions. These things are going to be cheap. Look at the end result of a technology such as the printing press becoming widely available -- we now have reams of printed matter everywhere we look. An active display technology that is so convenient to use and cheap to produce has just as much potential, if not more, for becoming pervasive and used everywhere.

    I think the biggest question for widespread use of these things, on a commodity level rather than an appliance level (toilet paper, not PDAs), is power. I don't think anything on the market today is truly a satisfactory answer to the question of how to power ubiquitous flexible displays like these, but we're close. See a very recent slashdot post (no link, so lazy...) about flexible solar cells being developed. Also, there is an incredible push for greatly improved battery technology, and great steps are being made there.

    Ultimately, there will be two kinds of uses for this technology. The first one we'll see will be the sort that is more or less permanently installed, and can therefore be plugged into the wall all or some of the time. Even the skyscraper-as-television fits into this category. But at some point you'll need batteries or solar cells or some other power source (some wacky nanotech?) to power more "disposable" applications like animated handbills, greeting cards, movie posters, etc.

    End result: advertising is about to get a lot more annoying. Let's just hope they haven't got paper-thin speakers to go with this.

    1. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by dschuetz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The first one we'll see will be the sort that is more or less permanently installed, and can therefore be plugged into the wall all or some of the time.

      That's what I want. I mean, ActiveDesktop is cool, and all, and I've got webcams and wether reports and traffic cameras and the like on my desktop, but at any given moment maybe 90% of my screen is covered with windows. And if I were to hook up a third monitor, I'd want to use it as more desktop space, not as a permanent "information poster."

      But, if I could have a 3x2 foot "poster" hanging on the wall of my office, plugged into the USB port on the computer, and feed data to it, then that'd be great. I could put up webcams, stock tickers, anything that'd be interesting to see but not important enough to keep in a foreground window.

      It'd be great to be able to simply glance up and say "ugh, traffic's getting bad, I'd better head home soon."

      So, where do I sign up?

  9. Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by budgenator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I doubt that a roll-up tv screen or monitor will ever be practical. Firstly, every pixel will have to be driven and that requires an electical connection. A 1024 X 768 will require atleast 786,433 electical contections, and wires made of metal. I expect serious problems with metal-fatigue induced conductor fractures, for roll-up displays. I'll admit that the ribbon cable inside a printer goes through a lot but it doesn't have a quarter of a million conductors either.
    This has a lot of cool potential applications, but roll-up displayed will not be marketable

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    1. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by The+Creator · · Score: 4, Informative
      A 1024 X 768 will require atleast 786,433 electical contections

      Actually the minimum is not x*y it's x+y(well 3x+y anyway, or better x+3y for rgb). If you imagine all other contions being set to high impedance. One pair at a time used to illuminate a pixel and a scanning techinque used. That only makes it 3328 connections.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    2. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by spacefrog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Metal? Metal you say?

      Conductive Polymers should solve that whole problem pretty well.

    3. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by Creepy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The original logic should be 2359296 connections, one each for RGB and 1024x768.

      A little more on this subject...

      If you use scanlines, you could get away with a single wire carrying a signal (or a signal and power if power is being distributed over the same wire) and decode the signal at each pixel and distribute power (for intensities) at the contact point into the RGB plastics. That would reduce your calculation down to... 1792 connections (x+y) since some decoding is happening at the contact points.

      The disadvantage is you'd need decoder logic for every pixel, but this may be easier and more producable than individual wires. If the decoders were good enough, you could reduce the wires further by having 4 pixels decoded for each wire (providing the wire meets at a single contact point for the four pixels. A four pixel connection point without scanlines reduces the number of wires to 196608 for continuous updates (such as the original example) and with scanlines you halve the values in each direction ending with 896 wires (512+384).

      Fast scan conversion with long "burn" times would likely not be noticable (update takes a fraction of the "on screen" time - probably less noticable than a TV), and if some memory is available for each pixel and a clock is used, one could double buffer the display, and have a near 0 update time.

      I'm sure there are other possibilities. My main point is that wiring isn't the only option for each pixel or pixel component (RG or B), as long as there is enough space to stick in a small amount of circuitry to do some decoding at the end.

  10. Animated T-shirts anyone? by Te1waz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think I'd like one of a Penguin stomping on MS HQ...

    Better still, if the material could be made thin enough and safe to implant under the skin you could have animated tattoos you could reprogram at will.
    (I'd go for a penguin stomping on MS HQ again)

    --
    From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
  11. Printing Circuits by icb1000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the other pretty cool technologies being developed by the guys at Plastic Logic (a spin off company created by the same people from Cambridge University who formed CDT) is the ability to create full electronic devices by using an inkjet printer loaded with a cartridge of these conductive polymers. It would be pretty cool to be able to see a useful device on a web page, download the circuit, print it out of your inkjet and then have the working device straight away.

  12. Refresh Rate? by Slothrop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't seem to find anything about what kind of refresh speeds they can get from this, or energy consumption. Has anyone seen any current figures released by these people?

    Regardless of how cool this could be, it'll be a dud unless it makes laptops last longer and has at least equal moving image quality compared with LCD screens.

  13. Or, Feed In Some Porn... by Myriad · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... and Voila! The Body You Never Had - from twenty feet or so, anyway.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  14. Until... by The+Creator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone illuminates the whole area with a light that blinks at such a frequence, that you suit(due to the latency) is out of phase. : )

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  15. Rollup screens = ultimate portable PCs by pieterh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been dreaming of my ultimate portable for some time, and this - roll-up screens - was all that was missing. I have a roll-up waterproof keyboard that works quite well. Imagine the guts of a notebook PC (no CD, keyboard, screen), a kind of brick the size of a stack of CDs. Fits into your pocket. You can add a flat battery underneath for portable use. You can plug in a roll-up screen and keyboard when you're on the road. At the office you dock it into your main notebook or desktop - synchronizing all your data, updating your email, etc.

  16. Wanna bet? by BeBoxer · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not just the individual pixels which are made with polymers. It's the individual traces also. In fact, the whole field of polymer semiconducters is starting to ripen and bear fruit. The sheets of plastic they print won't only have light emitting portions, it can include power traces and even decoding logic! There might be a copper ribbon cable to connect the entire display to whatever external source provides data and power. But the entire display will be made from polymers.

    This really is amazing technology. The circuitry is basically printed out using ink jet style heads. Actually, one of the article says that it actually plots the traces out ala a good old fasioned plotter as opposed to line-by-line like a printer. It's not hard to imagine that this stuff will lead to a rebirth of the homebrew electronics hobbyist. Even if you couldn't afford to buy your own plotter, a prototyping shop which owned one should be able to produce custom circuits to your own design in an extremely fast and cheap manner. Imagine a semi-conductor Kinkos! Could be cool stuff.

  17. Don't assume this is transparent by Goldenhawk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most of the posts here assume plastic = transparent. Yeah, that would be nice. But it's not necessarily the case here. Nothing in the article suggests that this display is transparent.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  18. Anyone see Minority Report? Screens everywhere. by Goldenhawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A number of the comments here about advertising and the proliferation of displays reminded me of Minority Report. Everywhere the characters went were advertising displays - wrapped around the walls of stores and malls, moving billboards, even animated cereal boxes (John Anderton angrily tosses one aside after being bothered by the distraction at one point). Obviously Spielberg has the same vision of the future as many of you.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  19. A printable screen... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I want to be able to go into a store and say 'I'd like a screen 120" wide by 67" tall', and have them print it for me there on the spot, laminate it together, then just sell me a little re-usable "connection" module that clips on the edge of the screen to power/activate it.

    If you want a different size screen, you just toss out the old one, keep the module and get a new one printed up.

    And it's starting to sound very, very possible...

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  20. Re:Skintight display by Myco · · Score: 3, Funny

    Speaking of such things, imagine if someone hacked in to your t-shirt. How long would it take before someone told you that you had goatse dot cx on your back?

  21. Just -7 years away! by rayd75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've read a number of articles on these and other flat, flexible displays such as "digital paper". It's amusing that all of this life-changing display technology is just months from everyday use... and has been for the past six or seven years.

  22. Blue polymers perfected? by babymac · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've been following the development of CDT for some time now. The last I heard, they hadn't yet perfected a polymer for the color blue. They would degrade and die within a couple thousand hours of use. Considering the fact that normal CRTs last a lot longer than that, I don't see LEPs becoming popular or practical until this problem is overcome. Does anyone know anything about further development in this area?

    --
    "War makes me sad." - Me
  23. Hmmm I know one I'd like.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd love to buy a roll of TV, change the channel to WB, and then use it as TP.

    Who knows? that could displace Nielson ratings!

  24. Roll-up TV? Why? by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why would I want a roll-up TV screen? Ever since I moved my 4 computers out of my living room and into the second bedroom, my living room has appeared empty. Now I'm supposed to roll-up my TV when I'm done watching? Maybe if it's on remote control, but otherwise, forget it. I like it the way it is.

    I like the "Maps in the field" kinda thing, though. Kinda like Red Planet.

    It's kinda cool watching some things from Sci-Fi come to reality. I just wish they'd get working on the damn holodeck. Talk about the ultimate in addictions. I'd never leave.

  25. Some more uses... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    ALL roadsigns adapt to current conditions. (Detours, construction, accidents, the Fair, the Fair!)

    Change the appearance of large items at will - make your house 'look' scary on Halloween, Waving flags and fireworks on the 4th. Give your house a stone wall, garden, or 'trees'. Make your house 'transparent' or 'invisible' for parties, exhibitionism or to get 'away'! (Screens on both inside and coutside of course.) Change 'wallpaper' at whim, decorate by era, place, or fetish. Make your apartment look like its huge! Play a 'real' game of quake, or nethack!

    Your car could be a different color every day, or adapt 'styling features' (camo trucks for hunters or the army) 'fake' turbo for all the Rice-Boys out there.

    Put 'windows' to the outside world or made up world in your office or cube. Your 'desktop' could be your desktop! Video conferencing could be far more personal, and body language would become useful.

    A VR Holodeck of sorts could be be possible, embed into all surfaces in a room.

    One *real book - any book contained within!

    Graffitti could become an accepted artform. Leave it there a week and then *poof*

    Learn to dance with the 'magic' footprints appearing at the proper times and positions.

    The Hoover dam could be the biggest theater in the world!

    Of course, by the time this comes to pass, the **AAs will probably have legislated that a user cannot view these screens without pervasive advertising. The Hoover dam will play McDonalds and Disney commercials 7 out of 8 hours, some 'Avatar' will follow you around offering product suggestions every two minutes, and someone will get pissed at you for something and hack your house, car and t-shirt to show goatse.cx at random intervals.

    Don't want to think about that on the Hoover dam

  26. Billboard theft by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What a cracker target that would be for defacing.

    Or for stealing. There isn't much use for the LED scrolling banner thingies at home, nor is stealing one of the jumbotron type things in Times Square an option. However, if they have these things everywhere, small poster-sized ones would work nice as a TV at home and wouldn't last too long on the streets.

    I'd say that for a billboard, they will use smaller polymer displays which will be cheaper to make than one mondo 24'x32' display. Say 48 -4'x4' screens. Now, there's a tempting target- you might not have much use for a 24'x32' screen, but all those smaller screens, think what you could do with them?

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  27. Wallpaper! by C60 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've been waiting for this one for a long time. Once this is mass produced how long do you think it's going to take until someone turns it into addressable wallpaper for your home? Screw rolling the thing up, just return the wall to your favorite pattern/color when you're done watching TV.

    Now you go and take this stuff and combine it with the See-Through, Paper-Thin Speakers and you've got your media where ever you go.

    Just makes me wonder how long it's going to be until movies are made from a central perspective, like IMAX in your home.

    At the very least it should be a cheaper method for bringing those remaining 34,940 movie theatres into the digital age

    --
    Karma: 0 (But I wield a mean +10 Vorpal Apathy)