Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Says IBM/Linux Their Biggest Threat
krypt0n0mic0n writes "An article at The Register shows that Microsoft sees IBM and Linux as the biggest threats to their market domination. Microsoft's Eric Rudder is quoted as saying that Linux is a "formidable" challenge and that "IBM is our greatest competitor. In the way they sell products and compete in corporate accounts." It goes on to say that they believe the NET server will be a challenge to these competitors."
It's shameful how bad that movie was compaired to the book. Heinlein is rolling in his grave.
Puppy's only live 12 years and age 6/7 times as fast as people. Cancer would be better, eating away at Microsoft in their old days until there is nothing left.
What?
I realize this is totally off-topic, but I feel I must reply to the difference between the Movie and the Book. To me, the movie and the book are complete opposites. The only thing they really have in common is the name. In the book, the troops were competent; in the movie, they had crappy slug throwere and panicked at the very site of the bugs. In the book, the bugs had weapons (like balsters) and intelligence; in the movie, the bugs were almost pure animal. In the book, people didn't realize a war was going on for years; in the movie, people were completely gung-ho about war. In the book, 3 total people signed up to join the militar; in the movie, thousands of people were joining up. In the book, they glassed planet P; in the movie, it was a small police action. I personally detested the movie, but that was mostly because of the pure facist society that Paul Verhoven and crew thought would be a good idea, which totatlly destroys what I feel Heinlein was trying to put across. It worked in very well Robocop, but this one trick pony should have kept it's mitts off Starship Troopers.
That's what made it so bad.
The ideals presented in the book are taken out of context and made to look absurdly facist.
In the movie one of the cadets says something like "What good is a knife in a nuke fight anyway? All you gotta do is push a button, SIR!" and then the drill instructor says "Put your hand on that wall!" and throws a knife through his hand and says "The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand!"
The drill instructors reply in the book goes like this:
"If you wanted to teach a baby a lesson, would you cut its head off? Of course not. You'd paddle it. There can be circumstances when it's just as foolish to hit an enemy city with an H-bomb as it would be to spank a baby with an axe. War is not violence and killing, pure and simple; war is controlled violence, for a purpose. The purpose of war is to support your government's decisions by force. The purpose is never to kill the enemy just to be killing him...but to make him do what you want to do. Not killing...but controlled and purposeful violence. But it's not your business or mine to decide the purpose of the control. It's never a soldier's business to decide when or where or how -- or why -- he fights; that belongs to the statesmen and the generals. The statesmen decide why and how much; the generals take it from there and tell us where and when and how. We supply the violence; other people -- 'older and wiser heads,' as they say -- supply the control. Which is as it should be."
I hereby retire my /. account. The posted responses to this article are so mindlessly idiotic and empty of any valuable thought, that my back has been broken by this straw. I know I am preaching to many members of the choir. This message is not directed to you. You already know the idiocy of many posts on this site. This is not a sudden realization on my part. I have seen many similar posts in the past. My brain hurts from trying to think of a way to describe the complete and utter stupidity of which I am in awe. Therefore, I am not even going to discuss it. Let it suffice to say that I will never read (or submit) another post on /. as long as I live. I will logout in a few moments, never to be heard from again. I will continue to visit the site for the simple purpose of finding news articles in which I am interested. That is it and that is all. I realize that few, if any, of you care. I just want to let the record show.
"Goodbye. Nice to know you." -Incubus
this is a left handed sig
... and which of those passages makes for a better movie? The first one.
I'm amazed at all the people who are offended by the Starship Troopers movie. Anyone with half a brain would notice the 'propaganda' style of it within the first 5 minutes. Removing all Heinlein's pointless meandering made for a much better plot-line, and a much more satisfactory film that would have resulted from the director being a Heinlein-worshipping fanboy like yourself.
-- Help Digitise the Public Domain at DP.