Slashdot Mirror


Back to the Moon?

An anonymous reader writes "This BBC story discusses the prospects of probes returning to the moon. The article first mentions the ESA's SMART-1 probe, which will overfly the Apollo landing sites during 2003, and then talks with US scientists about why NASA should send probes back."

4 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. I agree by sinistre · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After I saw the documentary claiming it was all a hoax I'm convinced. I think the Russians should send some probes and try to provide "independent" evidence whether the US was there or not. I truly believe it was a hoax.

    Unbelieveable that they'd pull something like that...

  2. So many posts about not getting there by Ark42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why are so many people so damn ignorant that they actually believe we never went to the moon?

    This is a good site, even if they are conspiracy theorists about other coverups and such:
    http://www.lunaranomalies.com/fake-moon.htm

  3. Re:i thought by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I read quite a lot about this too.. I can't really make up my mind. There were many interesting facts suggesting why man never actually made it to the moon all those years ago - you can make up your own mind by checking out some of the sites listed below. I really cannot make up my mind on this..

    http://www.apollohoax.com/

    http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/


    http://a1.nu/moon-landing-hoax/

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  4. Re:i thought by meta-monkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yeah, I've given this a thought, too, and I've seen the photos and what not, but I just don't believe it could be a hoax, because I don't think anybody could keep a secret this big. I mean, the government can barely deliver the mail, I doubt they could fake a project this huge, that received this much media coverage, and involved tens of thousands of people, without it leaking out that it's all fake.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.