Slashdot Mirror


Black Blobs Appearing In Camden, NJ

Ieshan writes "Strange alien scares or just New Jersey Pollution? Occam's razor points towards the latter, but still, odd black blobs are appearing in a New Jersey city - no joke. CNN has the story - apparently, no one can identify them yet. Investigators say that they're not petrolium based, and that's about all anyone knows. On the plus side, at least they don't have stalks with green eyes?"

88 comments

  1. A vote for gum by yasth · · Score: 1, Funny

    They are everywhere in populated areas. They are gum.

    --
    I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    1. Re:A vote for gum by ceejayoz · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Gum that everyone notices at once and that gets larger over time? RTFA...

    2. Re:A vote for gum by Darkstorm · · Score: 1

      Actually they said shrinks over time. Supposedly, although they didn't show a pic of one, it starts at up to 6 inches and then goes down to the size of a half dollar coin.

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    3. Re:A vote for gum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rtfa yourself pinhead

    4. Re:A vote for gum by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      I see splots in down-town L.A. and Frisco also.

      I guess it to be gum too.

      I figure there are plenty to test, so we should have an answer one of these days. Do I get mod points if I am right? (Slashdot Vegas)

      Either that it is alien boogers.

    5. Re:A vote for gum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guys, just relax. The dots are Bill. He'll be gone in a few centuries.

  2. When they start... by Manax · · Score: 1
    When the blobs start moving under their own power, then we should start worrying, and get the nukes ready.

    --
    "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
    1. Re:When they start... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Why wait, I think nj could survive a tactical nuclear strike.

    2. Re:When they start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wait, I think nj could survive a tactical nuclear strike.

      Hasn't NJ already been nuked? Endless rubble heaps?

    3. Re:When they start... by onepoint · · Score: 1

      Go right ahead, drop the bomb on our heads. we would think it's just another fireworks display.

      I guess you never been to NJ, home of the Toxic Avenger, home of some of the best superfund sites, and yes Jimmy Hoffa is under Giant Stadium somewhere.

      Nobody in NJ would even notice that you dropped it, If anything the large hole you would make would be converted into a rather large public pool or roman hot bath.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  3. yup.... by jeffy124 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I go to school in Philadelphia, which is across the river from Camden, and grew up in southern Camden County, NJ, a comfortable 18 miles from Camden's state-leading crime rate and once close-to-nation-leading murder rate.

    Anyways, I've seen this story on the local news. One suspicion is jet fuel falling from planes landing at Philly International, but I dont think that explanation holds much as why havent these blobs been there for however many years the airport has been there?

    I personally would not be surprised if it's drug related. Philly started a huge crack down on drugs in recent weeks, causing many druggies to leave town. Camden then started their own crack down because that's where many druggies went.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:yup.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philly started a huge crack down on drugs in recent weeks, causing many druggies to leave town.
      ..and it was the addicted sidewalks and roads that suffered the most:)

  4. it's fallout... by Galahad · · Score: 3, Funny

    from Bruce Springsteen's latest album.

    --
    --jdp Maintainer of VisEmacs
    1. Re:it's fallout... by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      He was in NJ recently on a concert tour. I think he performed at the Tweeter Center, which is in Camden.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  5. How is this possible!? by quantax · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a resident of NJ for the last 20 years, I can say that there is no way this could possibly happen. As my fellow residents can vouch, NJ is the cleanest place of all the places in the world. Where else in the world can you wake up to the the beautiful view of a smoke-stack filled skyline, emitting fluffy plumes of green tinged smoke. Or perhaps the placid lakes and ponds, that maintain their rainbow colored, slick surfaces all year around. No sir, you cannot be more in tune with nature unless you live in NJ.

    --
    "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    1. Re:How is this possible!? by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      While I realize the joke you're making, you must live near Newark. Come down south some, and you'll find farmland and the Pine Barrens. It's a few miles off the turnpike.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:How is this possible!? by quantax · · Score: 2

      You guessed correctly. Actually, I have been camping in southern NJ a couple times; the pine barrens are pretty nice and I know as well as anyone the southern NJ can be as hickish & rural as Alabama. But we're still 'Dirty Jersey' since the north is where all the attention is directed, us being a massive suburb to NYC.

      --
      "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    3. Re:How is this possible!? by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      Dirty Jersey also exists not just near NYC, but all the way down the turnpike, enhancing that Dirty Jersey feel to people traveling from say Washington DC to New York. That's why I mentioned comming away from the TP by a few miles.

      As mentioned in another post, I grew up in Camden County, about 18 miles from where the blobs are. The area is on the western fringes of the Pine Barrens, and the Barrens are slowly losing their space to urban housing developments.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    4. Re:How is this possible!? by ShavenYak · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I know as well as anyone the southern NJ can be as hickish & rural as Alabama.

      Oh, I doubt that. You'd be surprised how hickish and rural Alabama can be. Ever stopped in Cullman? or Ozark?

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    5. Re:How is this possible!? by Thauma · · Score: 1

      Well at least the Passaic river hasn't caught on fire for a few years now.

      Once that happened, I moved to Maryland...

  6. Why isn't it on cars? by Darkstorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    well, if its something falling from the sky then it should realisticly be on everything, including cars. Actually it should be getting on people also.

    --
    If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    1. Re:Why isn't it on cars? by brejc8 · · Score: 2

      So all we have to do is to see if she weighs as much as a duck.

      Anyway it reminds me of a fortian story about some french scientist who was called to a village where people have been reporting that rock were falling out of the sky.
      He went there. Saw the rocks. Saw how they were driven into the ground like they fell out the sky.
      Then he concluded they made it up as there are no rocks in the sky how can they fall out the sky?
      case solved.

    2. Re:Why isn't it on cars? by Darkstorm · · Score: 2

      Actually, I'm not saying it isn't happening, just that they talk about it on the sidewalk, but not on the cars, or getting on people. It was a bit week on details. But IF it was something that was falling from the sky then it should be on just about everything that isn't covered up.

      First step in figuring any problem out is to determine what is and isn't possible. So if its not on the cars..isn't falling on people...ect. If its only on sidewalks (and I'm assuming the roads) then it would seem to be something that is either accumulating and condension on the ground, or being dropped by people.

      Of course it just might not like cars..eheh

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    3. Re:Why isn't it on cars? by brejc8 · · Score: 2

      I didnt mean it like that.
      Youre probably right

    4. Re:Why isn't it on cars? by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 1

      I remember a story about an (American founding father's?) reaction to reports of a small meteor strike before the existence of such things was widely documented:

      "I'd rather believe that two Yankees lied, than that a rock fell from the sky."

      It was a perfect application of the principle of Ockham's razor, except that in this case, the weirder explanation happened to be true.

      If anyone knows who made the quote, or the origin of this story, please post.

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    5. Re:Why isn't it on cars? by Darkstorm · · Score: 1

      you know, its amazing. I walked outside of work and low and behold on the sidewalks of Baltimore, MD is thousands of black spots. I never noticed how many there were before.

      But from the many times I've stepped in the chewing gum...I don't think there is any mystery here.

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    6. Re:Why isn't it on cars? by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 1

      Occam's Razor

      For the spelling impaired.

    7. Re:Why isn't it on cars? by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A Google search brought up several pages citing Thomas Jefferson as the source of the quote.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    8. Re:Why isn't it on cars? by masterkool · · Score: 0

      Its kind of strange that they are only seen on the ground. You'd think if there were that many of these blobs, someone would have seen one appear or fall or beam in or whatever, and at least there would be some basis of where they were coming from.

      --
      I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
  7. Melty Melty Hans Solo by Terminus0 · · Score: 0

    Perhaps it is poorly mixed asphault-tar that under heat or pressure has decided to melt up through a crack in the road.

    1. Re:Melty Melty Hans Solo by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      Except it's on the sidewalk, and tests seem to show it's not petroleum-based.
      The photo looks like old dried-up gum, but unless a gum factory exploded, that wouldn't explain the rate of accumulation... :)

    2. Re:Melty Melty Hans Solo by arnex · · Score: 1

      tests seem to show it's not petroleum-based.

      Not quite. According to the article, "a quick field test wasn't able to confirm that the substance was petroleum-based." For all we know, somebody licked it and decided it didn't taste like motor oil.

  8. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Drug related? What the fuck are you talking about? Yeah, it's those druggies and their terrorist friends! They're going to use the blobs to resurrect Stalin and infiltrate America with communists, as shown the movie "Invasion of the Body Snatchers!"

    What have you been smoking, friend?

  9. Well, i always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Bob Lentine, assistant commissioner of the county health department, said he thinks the stuff might be ... discharge from the jets that fly directly overhead from nearby Philadelphia."

    Ahhhh, so that's where they empty the toilets in planes.

    1. Re:Well, i always wondered... by Kobal · · Score: 1

      Nah. Emptying toilets in planes is waaaay more funny. More like, say, a large congelated block of crap falling through your roof.

  10. The article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The article states that they were not able to confirm that it was petroleum based. This is completely different from showing it is not petroleum based. If you don't know why, you have a poor understanding of hypothesis testing and the scientific method in general. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because you can't confirm that some stranger is who they say they are doesn't mean they are lying. Etc.

    1. Re:The article by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Actually it is quite possible that the fact the field test didn't work was proof it wasn't tar or oil from cars - as the test may have been reliable for those forms of petroleum products, and while it eliminated those possibilities, it did not totally eliminate other forms of hydrocarbons. The way the article is worded, I can easily see that as a possibility, but given the confused wording, I would not lend any credence to anything "stated" in the article.

      Did a satellite fall to earth in that town recently? If so, even if the town suddenly dies off, I wouldn't worry - it'll probably mutate to a harmless state very quickly.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  11. No cause to worry? by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Funny
    Bob Lentine, assistant commissioner of the county health department, said he thinks the stuff might be industrial pollutants or fuel discharge from the jets that fly directly overhead from nearby Philadelphia. In any case, it's probably nothing to worry about, he said.
    Yeah, Nothing to worry about at all. Just chemical waste or something. Nothing to see here...
    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
  12. It's roofing g tar by netringer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A noticed the black blobs on new sidewalks right here in Chicago. I could see a lot of dots on the sidewalk below when I looked down from the 'L' platform. I figured that they were chewing gum but wondered how there could be so much.

    It makes sense that it's tar that flows off of the roofs in the extreme heat. I saw a temperature of 106 degrees F on concrete a few weeks ago. Black flat roofs probably get a lot hotter.

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    1. Re:It's roofing g tar by jkujawa · · Score: 2

      Unlikely. Roofing tar is petroleum-based, the article stated that this stuff is not.

      I'm betting on The Blob.

    2. Re:It's roofing g tar by jared9900 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the article says that it is not roofing tar. Or at least according to the field test, when they actually take more time they may find that the test was inaccurate.

    3. Re:It's roofing g tar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:It's roofing g tar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes sense that it's tar that flows off of the roofs in the extreme heat.

      See, it's all caused by GLOBAL WARMING.

    5. Re:It's roofing g tar by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just (like 10 min ago) did a study over about 4 blocks of sidewalk. It was along a large road going through a very large campus (UIUC). I counted ~1100 black spots ~2-3cm in diameter, just like the ones in the report. There were virtualy none under overhangs, but the highest concentrations were just outside overhangs, and near trash cans. Trees seemed to have no effect, whether the spots were under, near, or far away from them seemed to have no effect on concentration. Far away from buildings, there were fewer spots, but high concentrations still existed ~10m away. The few parts of brick sidewalk (around covered bus stops) had almost no spots. There was not nearly as much in streets, but there was in crosswalks

      The fact that they are concentrated around trash cans and near buildings, not under overhangs but under trees, and were in crosswalks but not streets all lead me to guess that they are placed there by induviduals, so probably chewing gum built up with crud. As for why they were not under overhangs, maybe there is a sub-concious predispositon not to spid out gum indoors, and the overhang might trick their sub-concious into thinking that they are still inside.

      Roofing tar would all be concentrated right up against the buildings.

      I suspect that this is the same phenomena as in NJ

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    6. Re:It's roofing g tar by t · · Score: 2
      With this kind of description, it would make more sense if it was some kind of weird mold eating the crap that has sunk into the concrete. Mostly likely spreading underneath the concrete.

      t.

    7. Re:It's roofing g tar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and people "proved" we didn't go to the moon.

  13. Blobs? Pits? Same old story? by skaffen42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This reminds me of the Seattle Window Pitting Hysteria (about half way downb the page).

    So these days we blame aliens instead of demons, but that is about the only thing that changes.

    Idiocy is a universal constant...

    --
    People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    1. Re:Blobs? Pits? Same old story? by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 2

      Wait, so was the cause ever found? Or was it just normal pitting that many people have in their windshields from gravel, etc. My last car had one...

      That would be funny if some guy in that other town suddenly had a pit in his windshield that he couldn't explain, and ran around in circles blaming it on fallout, and then the rest of the people of the town noticed pits that they haddn't seen before and fed the hysteria, and then as it passed by word of mouth more people in seattle started noticing, and by that time it seems as if there is an epidemic of winshield pitting, when actualy it is just normal.

      Yeah, that would be funny...


      That sentence was way too long, wasn't it?

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    2. Re:Blobs? Pits? Same old story? by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      Should have used a link to a more in-depth article, but I tend to forget that other people don't spend as much time on skeptic websites as I do and wouldn't recognize the story immediatly. This probably can be explained by my not having a life. :)

      Anyway, here is a quote from the article above that puts things in perspective:

      "Nevertheless, conventional wisdom lay with the scientists. Further investigation by the City of Seattle Police Department showed that most dings pitted older car windshields. In cases where auto lots were involved, brand new cars were unpitted, whereas used older cars showed signs of pitting. Police found rare instances of "copycat" vandalism, but most of the cases had a simple explanation: The pits had been there all along, but no one had noticed them until now."

      So there you have it.

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
  14. map distribution in GIS by Parsec · · Score: 1

    Do you think that if they mapped the distribution of these in a Geographic Information System, it would point to the source? Such as being distributed mainly along a flight path, or exactly downwind of a certain factory, or in a radial pattern from GumWorld(r).

    1. Re:map distribution in GIS by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Do you think that if they mapped the distribution of these in a Geographic Information System, it would point to the source? *)

      Do you mean like crop circles being a secret message, or a trail left by a dripping machine?

      Hey, that would be cool: if you plot them all, they make the shape of Elvis.

  15. The black blobs... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

    don't need to "take over" Camden, NJ - they can have it, for all I care.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  16. right now in the oval office by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

    Mr. President, I regret to inform you that project XV 543b has escaped! Black tar-like spots have been appearing on sidewalks everywhere in Camden NJ, and at they're rate of multiplication they will be ready to attack in roughly two weeks. Shall I order an evacuation sir?

    <Dubya> NJ eh?

    <Some General> Yes Sir.

    <Dubya> Screw 'em they voted Democrat.

    --
    >
  17. Correction by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 1

    Well I'll be! It -can- be spelled Ockham.

    Whoops. Apologies.

    1. Re:Correction by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 1

      I've seen both. Which is more standard?

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    2. Re:Correction by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 1

      Occam, I believe - it's how I've always seen it. But I could be wrong - humbling, isn't it?

  18. Oh brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up in NJ. My dad was a chemical engineer and he knew.

    Anyone in the NJ chemical industry will tell you. New Jersey was chemical dump central for dozens of years. Illegal dumping of all kinds of toxins were spread around the state.

    Why? Corporate cheepness. It costs allot to properly dispose of toxic chemicals. Later, developers built on those areas. Why? Profits. Do you think anyone wants to talk about it? Risk giving up their homes? Risk driving down property values?

    Remember when the US Government admited that nuclear fallout from the hundred or so above ground tests of the 40's, 50's and 60's blew as far as Long Island (how much farther could it go anyway?)

    Say it once, then shut up, wait a little and find a scape goat. The nuclear bomb testing scape-goat is cigarettes. When is the last time you heard Joe Public in the midwest or east coast complain they got cancer from those nuclear tests? And why is it that the cancer rate in Japan (where they smoke 4x more and on average, stronger brands) is less than half that of the US?

    Don't get me started.

    1. Re:Oh brother. by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Wait, there were two nuclear "tests" in Japan in 1945 also, right?

      Do you have any sources for your theory? That is, researh which backs up the statements:
      1) Nicotine does not increase cancer risk, and
      2) Fallout from nuclear testing was spread over the US heavily enough to affect cancer rates.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    2. Re:Oh brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they were Atomic tests. Not to be confused. Do some research, whole other ballgame ;)

    3. Re:Oh brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So nuclear bombs are not the same as atomic bombs. They are way more 'dirty'.

      "The United States conducted 215 atmospheric (includes 5 underwater) tests from 1945 to 1963." - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the Press Secretary

      Sorry, I can't find the reference to the distance it covered off hand. I heard it on news reports (TV not web).

      It is nonetheless simple logic with the jetstream going from west to east. I will keep looking for the ref.

    4. Re:Oh brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since "atomic" power is derived from fission or fusion of the nucleus of the atom, the terms "atomic" and "nuclear" may as well be interchangeable when discussing power generation or bomb building. If you are trying to distinguish between the kind of bomb used to blow up Japs in the '40s as opposed to the kind we wanted to use to blow up Rooskies from the '50s to the '80s, use "fission" and "fusion".

  19. Don't worry, it's just pollution by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2
    Bob Lentine, assistant commissioner of the county health department, said he thinks the stuff might be industrial pollutants or fuel discharge from the jets that fly directly overhead from nearby Philadelphia. In any case, it's probably nothing to worry about, he said.

    Boy, that makes me feel a lot better.

    1. Re:Don't worry, it's just pollution by capnjack41 · · Score: 1
      Fuel discharge from the jets

      Since when is that nothing to worry about? Do jets discharge fuel on a routine basis? For all I know maybe they do, but...

  20. Legacy of cigarette butts, maybe? by Pepperpot · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that black blobs like this occur where cigarette butts are likely to have been discarded. The ones I see do not visually thick or gooey enough to be gum--and they're black, black, black. Looks to me like someone dropped a drop of asphalt crack filler on the concrete or brick surface. So would there be some process that would turn a cigarette filter and/or cigarette ash and/or unburned tobacco into such a blob?

  21. 6"? by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 2

    I find it supicious that these people claim that the blobs start out 6" accross, and then shrink way down to dry 1" spots, yet there are only pictures of the spots.

    In a google image search of the word sidewalk, here are the first few pics that come up in which the sidewalk can be seen clearly enough to make out any potential spots:
    spots
    No spots (but close in)
    2 small spots
    no spots, but quite funny
    no spots
    small spots
    small spots

    Ok, so there is some background spotting on many sidewalks, which MAY explain the smaller ones. The yet unphotographed larger ones could be from public exaguration/hysteria. here are several examples of such events. In particular look at the seattle winshield pitting in 1954, and the school gas leaks in 88. I'd bet that those spots are usualy there, just that nobody paid attention until now.

    --

    Don't Bogart the fish sticks
  22. It's blatant Karma Whoring, but I can't resist by fm6 · · Score: 2


    Beware of The Blob, it creeps
    And leaps and glides and slides
    Across the floor
    Right through the door
    And all around the wall
    A splotch, a blotch
    Be careful of The Blob


    Words and music by Burt Bacharach.

  23. Not able to *confirm* that it's petroleum-based by saforrest · · Score: 1

    From the article (emphasis mine):

    A quick field test wasn't able to confirm that the substance was petroleum-based, said Department of Environmental Protection spokesman Fred Mumford. That seems to rule out tar from roofs or street repairs and leaky cars.

    This is not the same as what the OP claimed: "Investigators say that they're not petrolium based" (sic).

    Maybe it is just tar or cigarette remains.

  24. Windshield pitting epidemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the great Windshield Pitting Epidemic out in Seattle I think it was. The black goo has always been there but some one just noticed it.

  25. Dreamcatcher by zaphod123 · · Score: 1

    Maybe it is a publicity stunt for Dreamcatcher, which is being made into a movie...

    --
    :q!
  26. STORY UPDATE!! by Veramocor · · Score: 2, Funny

    The black blob has been found to be very dangerous. A woman, Denise Crosby, 45, was killed mysteriously when trying to walk pass the blob. Police are warning New Jersey residents to stay away while scientists determine how the blob caused her death.

    --
    Veramocor
  27. Simpsons Reference by aengblom · · Score: 2

    Article: A quick field test wasn't able to confirm that the substance was petroleum-based, said Department of Environmental Protection spokesman Fred Mumford.

    Slashdot: It's roofing tar

    Obligatory simpsons reference:
    Lisa: I don't understand professor, why didn't your tests show that the skeleton was a fake.
    Dr. Gould:
    I'm going to be honest with you Lisa, I never did the tests.
    [Dr. Gould walks away]

    I mean...it's Camden

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  28. It's paraffin wax by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    It was just reported on the local news here in Philadelphia.

    They speculate it got there from candle-drippings from all the candlelight vigils they have for people getting shot to death, etc.

  29. It's not chewing gum or tar by damien_kane · · Score: 1

    It is moldy saliva.
    I saw those spots while growing up in a small town (mitchell) in southwestern Ontario, and I still see them now in Toronto.
    I always saw them in higher concentrations in places where many people smoke (for example smoking sections at highschools).
    They are about the size of a spitwad, and about the shape of a normal one too...
    This would also explain being found just outside of overhangs (as another user pointed out). People will crowd under an overhang in the rain, but they wont spit on each other, they will spit on the ground where all the rain is.
    It's no big deal, just use a pressurewasher to clean them off every couple of months and you have nothing to worry about.
    Give the conspiracy theories a rest.

  30. New Flight Pattern by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

    One suspicion is jet fuel falling from planes landing at Philly International, but I dont think that explanation holds much as why havent these blobs been there for however many years the airport has been there?

    Because Philly International changed their flight patterns about 2 years ago. Now the line is almost a direct line from Lindenwold to the Airport, along roughly the same track as the PATCO high speed line.
    Sit in the Lindenwold parking lot at watch them line up for final approach. The view is even better at Ferry Avenue.

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
    1. Re:New Flight Pattern by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      that would make sense. I live in Clementon (next town over from Lindenwold), about a mile up Berlin Rd from the Park. A few years ago I was landing on a flight from Florida to PHI, and saw the big ferris wheel and my house in the same view.

      Anyways, I saw on Channel 6 News last night that the blobs have been solved - Parafin Wax most from likely from candlelight vigils and such.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  31. Mystery solved. by Peter+T+Ermit · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're wax.

    1. Re:Mystery solved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also on CNN

      Quote: Sanders said she thinks she still doesn't know the truth. "I believe they're covering it up. I really do," she said.

      Translation: I WANT TO GET PAID

    2. Re:Mystery solved. by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      still doesn't explain why said wax is falling from the sky all of a sudden

  32. Well... by cornjchob · · Score: 1

    If it's the Garden State, things should be growing, right? I mean smoke stacks are goin' up like friggin rabbits.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  33. bubble burst by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is all the falling dots from the dying dot-com's

  34. It's Shit from Airplanes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Shit.... Shit... Shit...

    If you have ever seen Joe Dirt, you'll know what I'm talking about!

  35. It's Shit from Airplanes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Shit.... Shit... Shit...

    If you have ever seen Joe Dirt, you'll know what I'm talking about!

  36. Reminds me of a Fritz Leiber short story by Yarn · · Score: 2

    The pollution in the air starts settling out and eventually it's only possible to survive up sky scrapers.

    Can't recall the name, but the collection I read it in was 'The Ghost Light'

    --
    -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  37. wax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just wax
    nothing more

  38. Weird NJ by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

    LOL. I live in Newark... and I take offense. :-p. Just kidding... a price to pay to go to the best comp sci school in the area. :)

    My dad is moving to Lindenwold and he hasnt heard about it yet...

    My guess is it's one of those Weird NJ things...

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  39. Black Blobs? by Stalyn · · Score: 0, Troll

    you mean black people right? hell there are tons of them in Camden. Whats the big deal?

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  40. It is actually Ockham. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man that it is named after is William of Ockham, a Franciscan monk who lived in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries A.D. He died in Munich, where there are streets named after him with the spelling of "Occam". I suppose that if you go by the rule that whatever the majority believes is true, then his name is most definitely Occam. But, if you go by that rule, then you have to believe other pieces of fiction like "Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb".