Slashdot Mirror


Amateur Mars Satellite

Hobbyspacer writes "The German AMSAT-DL group recently announced formal approval of the Phase 5-A project to send a spacecraft to Mars in the 2007 or 2009 launch window. The spacecraft will use the same structure as AO-40 (formerly Phase 3-D) that was launched into earth orbit in the fall of 2000. Like AO-40 the Mars probe will piggyback on an Ariane 5 launch and use the same 400 N propulsion system. (I expect they will solve the problem that caused the engine misfiring that nearly destroyed the spacecraft.) The Phase 3-E project was also approved to follow up AO-40 and to test various techniques and technologies for the Mars mission. The document P5A-to-Mars!(712k pdf) describes the technical challenges and possible solutions for such an ambitious mission. AO-40 cost several million dollars and the Mars probe should cost considerably more, requiring they obtain funds outside of AMSAT members and the ham radio community. The long list, though, of spectacular contributions made by AMSAT to the development of micro sats and space communications gives the program high credibility."

107 comments

  1. A big leap? by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think this is kind of a big leap from just a amateur rocket in space earlier this year. What happened to an actual geosynchronous satelite, a lunar probe, or even an amateur manned space shot? I think they should plan these first before they leap into such a project.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:A big leap? by lostchicken · · Score: 2

      The satellite is the easy part. The booster is the tricky bit.

      AMSAT groups have been putting satellites in space for years now from the tiny and simple to the complex and large (Oscar Phase IIId). It's like the difference between building aircraft and avionics. Boosters and satellites are two completely different animals.

      This probe will be on a commercial booster in a series with a well proven track record.

      --
      -twb
    2. Re:A big leap? by isaac · · Score: 2
      What happened to an actual geosynchronous satelite, a lunar probe, or even an amateur manned space shot?

      Remember that we are talking "amateur" as in "amateur radio," not in the more general context of "non-professional." AMSAT as an organization is concerned with launching satellites for the use of amateur radio operators, not with putting a man in space or a probe on the moon.

      I might also point out that the reason why there are no AMSATs in geostationary orbit has more to do with the fact that (useful) geostationary orbital slots are a scarce resource than anything else. AMSAT 3-D was launched into a geosynchronous transfer orbit (presumably as a piggyback on something else going to geosync) but its final orbit is highly elliptical, a useful orbit that is not at all scarce.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    3. Re:A big leap? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      Years? Try 4 decades.

      Bruce

  2. At the risk of sounding offtopic... by Tsar · · Score: 0

    It's getting easier to imagine a Beowulf cluster of NASA's. Perhaps someday all research of this type will be conducted by consortia of interested (and vested) parties, sharing expertise, resources and data. Sort of an open-source space program?

    1. Re:At the risk of sounding offtopic... by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Yes, maybe they will all fork and independently only ever get half way to the destinations they intend to reach, there will be 32 year old bearded hippies leaving their parents basements all over the world to wind up floating eternally through space desperately trying to use the little time, bandwidth, caffeine, and cold pizza they have left to upload patches to sourceforge.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:At the risk of sounding offtopic... by captainktainer · · Score: 1

      It's a good idea, and actually is close to the current state of affairs. The ESA has been collaborating closely with NASA and, surprisingly, with the Canadian space agency, mentioned in an earlier story. It's not going to be like a Beowulf cluster- more like a blogging community. Everybody links to and feeds off each other while providing unique content. Certainly it's more efficient than today's monolithic structure.

      However, I don't see a lot of private capital entering the picture just yet, and I don't see a lot of cooperation betweeen the public and private sector for a while- at least in America. NASA still has some lessons to learn, and the private sector needs to get seriously involved. The ISS seems to be a significant reason for both the unification of involved public space agencies and the continued lack of participation of commercial agents.

  3. Re:ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how was that off topic?

  4. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being amatures, will this mean they'll be sending bacteria on their probe to boot?

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beware bacteria with box cutter!

    2. Re:hmm by corleth · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then again, NASA almost definitely did so as well with Viking, etc., so you can't really blame it on them being amateurs. Well, unless, that is, you think of NASA as amateurs.

      -Karl

  5. Better not use a compass to orientate the lander.. by A+Rabid+Tibetan+Yak · · Score: 1

    ...with all those magnetic bacteria kicking around Mars these days :).

  6. how can i sign up? by thedbp · · Score: 2

    i want nothing more than an amatuer, grass-roots, half-assed spare time devotion created rocket to blast me away from this dirty goddamn planet full of hippies!

    1. Re:how can i sign up? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      (* rocket to blast me away from this dirty goddamn planet full of hippies! *)

      The hippies bother you more than PHB's?

    2. Re:how can i sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PHBs too, but at least the PHBs can GET us to Mars.

    3. Re:how can i sign up? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      hippies; dopey self-righteous pricks who believe in metaphysics, are anti-progressive, and gave "peace a chance". Whooptie-fucking doo. I have never met more people that proclaim selflessness whilst spenging 100's of dollars a month on drugs, junk food, and entertainment. Bottom feeding tubeworms, the whole lot of them.

    4. Re:how can i sign up? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* PHBs too, but at least the PHBs can GET us to Mars. *)

      At 400% markup or overruns

  7. Amateur Mars Satellite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did I just wake up from a frozen sleep?

  8. Contamination and porly funded projects by Speedy8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While all of these projects are cool, I wonder if the cheaper projects will have problems with lower standards of cleanliness and lead to contamination of Mars, possibly leading to the destruction of any curent life on Mars. After all Scientists have found that there was contamination on the first lunar lander that touched down on the Moon on 1967.

    1. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      I wonder if the cheaper projects will have problems with lower standards of cleanliness and lead to contamination of Mars

      Just use a PC speaker and special software

    2. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      You point isn't without merit, but it seems worth pointing out that any Martian lifeforms should have a tremendous advantage in their native environment.

      The real problem with contamination would probably be that we'd risk a false-positive on the who alien life thing.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by Speedy8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That may be true, but we have a track record of killing off the indigeounus life forms we meet, dating way back, even as far as invasion of the America's with disease.

    4. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      That's an improper analogy. People of Europe and of the America's were both of the same species, and therefore were both vulnerable to the same diseases, whether they've seen them before or not. However, the Europeans have been exposed to those diseases for a long time, and therefore had a certain level of resistance to it.

      There are likely no common species between Earth and Mars, so even if the probe is contaminated by any terrestrial bacteria/diseases, they will not be designed to infect or otherwise compromise Martian species. Not to say it would be impossible to kill of Martian life with terrestrial organisms, but just that your analogy is fallacious.

    5. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by Speedy8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are likely no common species between Earth and Mars, so even if the probe is contaminated by any terrestrial bacteria/diseases, they will not be designed to infect or otherwise compromise Martian species. I think you are limiting the scope of the analogy a little too far. The bacteria and disease was able to kill off the common species becase they have a similar envrnments to live in, the human host. While Martian environment is differant to most of Earth, it does have simularities to many places on Earth and we have many single cell organisms that thrive in the conditions simular to that on Mars and may, very easily drowned out the current populations.

    6. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by guttentag · · Score: 3, Funny
      Filed at 7:08 p.m. MSNST, August 5, 2033
      AMERICAN QUARTER, MARS RESEARCH BASE (MSNAP) -- MSASA researchers have discovered what appears to be a 2012-model German Sony Aibo in a region of Plateau 148 that was previously believed unexplored.

      The artificial dog had a spent CO2 cannister strapped to its back and flexible solar panels in place of floppy ears.

      "Basically, we're thinking this is probably the work of some amateur who thought it would be fun to illegally land on Mars before we got here," Mars Station Director Johnson said. "We are currently swabbing the dog for fingerprints and have been assured the full cooperation of the German police force in bringing this criminal to justice."

      According to initial reports, researchers first thought they had encountered an intelligent extra-terrestrial life form but lost interest when it didn't seem to understand English. A week later, a team carrying a German exchange scientist encountered the Aibo and was able to make it sit up, beg, and sing the Sony Anthem in German.

      The minimum penalty for sending your own property to another planet without MSASA permission is 3 years confinement on the roving Lunar Prison, which is designed to remain on the dark side of the moon at all times.

      "I'd like to remind everyone," Director Johnson said, "that you can't go around sending things to other planets. This isn't a joke. Leave this serious business of interplanetary travel to the professionals."

    7. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by parabyte · · Score: 1

      Fine joke, except: There is no *dark* side of the moon; the moon's rotation locks one side to the earth, not to the sun, so the *far* side of the moon gets as much sunlight as the near side.

      --
      Without order, nothing can exist. Without chaos, nothing can be created.
    8. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Pedantics aside, I'd guess that's why it was a ROVING prison, it moves on a lunar surface, escaping dawn so it always stays on whatever is dark side at the moment. Days and nights at Moon are so long that it wouldn't even have to move very fast.

    9. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      The moon's diameter is 3476 km. The circumference therefore is 3476 x Pi = 10920 km. One moon day lasts 28 earth days, therefore the prison would have to travel 10920 km in 28 earth days to stay in the night part, which equals 390 km in one earth day or about 16 km/h, which is hardly feasible for any vehicle given the rocky mountainous terrain.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    10. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      First, the thing will get to spend at least a year in space before it orbits Mars. Vaccumm and extreme temperatures are very good at sterilizing anything left living. Second, it's not going to land.

      But I do remember those pictures of Bdale without the face mask in Kouru. It seems they didn't have one that fit him.

      Bruce

    11. Re:Contamination and porly funded projects by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

      After all Scientists have found that there was
      contamination on the first lunar lander that
      touched down on the Moon on 1967.

      Yeah, and look what happened to that lush, green
      planet!

  9. Guess I've been an Amateur too long. by MsWillow · · Score: 2

    It took me three times, reading the summary to realize that they actually *are* planning a mission to the *planet* Mars, and that they are not putting up a bird to help out the Military Affiliate Radio System, aka MARS. It still makes more sense that it's a MARS bird - who'll be *on* Mars to use it? But there is (admittedly slight) a chance that this could prove useful here around Earth, if all Hades breaks loose with terrorists.

    73 de NNN0WYZ

    --

    Lemon curry?
  10. Advertising? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    I'd give the project lik $20 or so if they would place a BIG sign on mars, readable from orbit, that says:
    <Power to The User>

    Then again, they would probably misfire, and I would be out $20, unless they refund donations.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  11. Re:Better not use a compass to orientate the lande by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude come on, they'll obviously be using GPS.

  12. Ariane 5? by hendridm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Interesting name for a German craft. Does it have blonde hair and blue eyes too?

    Hallo Zicklein! Oben ankleiden wie hitler ist nicht kühl.

    1. Re:Ariane 5? by Kobal · · Score: 1

      The Ariane series aren't German, but French launchers, though most european countries are funding them by now. They are based in Kourou, French Guyane.

    2. Re:Ariane 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is not a French launcher, it's a European Launcher. 30% of the parts are coming France and 30% from Germany.

  13. Imperial vs. Metric by T-Kir · · Score: 1

    Here's hoping that they don't mix up Kilometers with Miles.

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Imperial vs. Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to worry about, this is a german project, it seems, and so they are using nothing but metrics... ofcourse.

    2. Re:Imperial vs. Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a typical American mistake. On this continent we do not use miles, and are therefore not inclined to make that particular mistake.

      Don't remind me about *other* mistakes ;-)

    3. Re:Imperial vs. Metric by corleth · · Score: 1

      Unless you consider the UK to be part of Europe. We can't decide which to use. At least we keep imperial units completely out of science and engineering.

      -Karl

  14. What's Next by Tablizer · · Score: 1


    Amature brain surgery?

    1. Re:What's Next by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points when I need them? (+1, Funny), dangit!

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
  15. Contamination? Howabout colonization? by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1

    Heck, man! And here I was about to suggest that they shoot some bacteria and cold-tolerant lichens and moss spores up there -- intentionally!

    I'm all for keeping natural environments untouched when there's a clear reason or there's something we're actually protecting...but what would you suggest is being damaged on the Moon or Mars? And, personally, I find the idea of "contaminating" Luna to be ludicrous. We're not talking intelligent life out there, nor are we talking about nutrient-rich environments. We're barely talking atmosphere. The moon (and, it seems, Mars) are about as close to the true definition of "wasteland" as you can get. And, if we kill off the native Martian unicellular organisms, so be it. I want that place to be well on its way to terraforming by the time I head up there with the first wave of manned flights.

    Best way to get at that all that locked-up water and use that carbon dioxide atmosphere would be to send some tough bacteria, with some of your basic algaes and lichens to start putting down roots...

  16. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hippies are the true evil in this world.

  17. Darn ! Now I know ! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0



    Ever since I was a little boy, I kept trying to get my satellite to fly to the moon.

    Everytime I throw the thing, everytime it falls down like a brick of lead.

    Now I know.

    What I need is an Atlas Rocket to get my stuffs "out there".

    Where can I get one, may I ask ?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  18. Re:Contamination? Howabout colonization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By studying life forms that managed to survive on mars we may learn what caused the rest to die off? We really don't know much about the conditions on the planet until we further study it in its existing state. Once that research is completed, we can do as we please with the ecosystem only with a more informed approach to the situation.

  19. Re:Better not use a compass to orientate the lande by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPS is no longer a scientifically correct term. From now on, please use EPS (Earth) MAPS (mars) and MOPS (moon). Thank you dude.

  20. This story reminds me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..of when Taco and I were getting banged by these 2 guys when we were at a spa in Greece. Goddamn- my sphincter hurt for DAYS but Taco took it all in stride. When I was stuck in the hotel room keeping off my fanny, he was off riding a Vespa fer chrissakes- all around Santorini! I can't believe he was able to take the pounding of the scooter's seat on those cheesy Greek roads when just a few hours before his cheeks were stretched to the limit. Dang that's stamina!

  21. waiting... by skydude_20 · · Score: 0

    I'm still browsing through all of NASA's satillite imagry of Mars hoping, waiting to see if they've noticed the probe I sent there many years ago.

    but you ask how do I know it got there ok? Well I put a camera on it and it has sent back some pretty interesting pictures, I'm just waiting for society to be more able to handle knowing that there is life more advanced than ours out there...

    hmm... so much for that secret, anyways...

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  22. Amateur != neophyte by pongo000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems like there's a lot of misconceptions about what the word "amateur" means. Amateur radio is named for its non-commercial nature (amateur as opposed to professional), and has nothing to do with level of competence. There are a great number of amateur radio operators who are experts in their fields of endeavor, and can hardly be considered "amateur" in terms of competence. Here's a list of some of the more famous amateurs. I see a Nobel Prize winner in physics on there, which I'd hardly consider "amateur."

    1. Re:Amateur != neophyte by zulux · · Score: 2


      And to add fuel to the fire - by definition all new ideas are proposed by amateurs. It's only after things have setteled down, do the professionals stands atop the pioneers and pronouce themselves clever.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Amateur != neophyte by linzeal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Criminal prisoners; hardly, you might want to step the accusation up to the prison industry's lobbying efforts. When minimium sentencing and 3 strike laws are written by paid proponents and merciless profiteers in a dying republic that revels in the lucrativeness of its own corruption.

    3. Re:Amateur != neophyte by RealUlli · · Score: 1
      *SPLAT* ... and the link above is already slashdotted... :-(

      Regards, Ulli

      --
      Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
    4. Re:Amateur != neophyte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ignore it, it's just the usual load of right-wing guff. Funny how freepers and dittoheads whine about taxes all the time but are in favour of paying for millions of non-violent drugs users to be locked away in prison, for as long a time as possible.

      Right wing politics isn't about lower taxes, it's about punishing any group you dislike. The taxes issue is a red herring and always was: what they dislike is not so much the paying of taxes but that some of the money goes to help people in need, and in the right-wing playbook, people in need are "losers", evil, and should be in prison.

      If every single mother now on welfare was in prison instead, at 5-10x the expense, you wouldn't hear a peep from zulux and his ilk. Ignore him, and your blood pressure will stay within reasonable levels.

      AC because this is off-topic.

    5. Re:Amateur != neophyte by zulux · · Score: 2

      That's why I made a distinction between prisioner of stupid laws, and a 'criminal prisoner'. We're an odd socioty - we criminialise silly things (pot, prostitition) and we give free reign to evil people (murderers and theives). It's a unjust socioty that imprissones a pot-head longer than the CEO of Enron: you'll get longer time for making love for money then running down a family with an SUV.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    6. Re:Amateur != neophyte by zulux · · Score: 2

      Sombody's been reading a bit too much Chomsky.

      But hey, if you like the stuipd, lazy and criminal - then keep at it. You're doing a pretty good job at the first.

      As for over-breeders beeing in 'need' - thats false. They are gready to over-breed and expect everybody else to pay the bill.

      This will really piss you off - I *enjoy* giving money to Planned Parenthood. I know every doller I spend will save me money in the long run.

      You posted AC because the label fit.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    7. Re:Amateur != neophyte by linzeal · · Score: 1
      The well to do have to have some way of decimating the poor before they revolt I suppose. Abortion meets the eugenic needs of many "well to do" people like Ted Turner and Bill Gates who can't imagine a life lived in poverty to be worth living at all.

      Chomsky has some well founded ideas about many things, but from an academic perspective not a personal one and that is where he fails. Like descarte before him he should of spent his days concentrating on listening to others' common sense before he donned the intellectual cap.

    8. Re:Amateur != neophyte by zulux · · Score: 2

      My main complaint with over-breading, is that all or our environmental and scocial problems stem, mostly, from overpopulation. It's bad enough that people are breading like bacteria, but the class of people that expect me to *pay* for them to over-bread really piss me off. As if their little crack baby is a blessing to this world.

      Once the little vermen are in the world - I do think we should shower them with education, prosperity and opertunity. It's the only chance we have to stop the cycle of stupidity, squalor and greed.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    9. Re:Amateur != neophyte by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Overpopulation has one solution as always, colinzation. Look up, all problems solved, for that.

    10. Re:Amateur != neophyte by zulux · · Score: 2

      A neet thing about colonisieng space too is that if some nutball decided to take out the world with a bang, that at least there's hope for humanity.

      Unfortunaly, it's easier to colonise the open seas than space right now - hopefully things will change soon. Working fusion reactors would help a lot right now..

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    11. Re:Amateur != neophyte by linzeal · · Score: 1

      You'll have to wait for a lot of ignorant people to die before fusion gets the funding it needs.

    12. Re:Amateur != neophyte by zulux · · Score: 2

      You'll have to wait for a lot of ignorant people to die before fusion gets the funding it needs.


      Well, thats easy! We just set up giant pits filled with spikes - put a few signs around stating "Warning, Giant Pit Filled With Spikes. Stay Away!"

      All rational people will take a look, shrug, and back away - the stupid will, of course, fall in. ;)

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    13. Re:Amateur != neophyte by drwho · · Score: 1
      zulux said: Well, thats easy! We just set up giant pits filled with spikes - put a few signs around stating "Warning, Giant Pit Filled With Spikes. Stay Away!"

      All rational people will take a look, shrug, and back away - the stupid will, of course, fall in. ;)

      I came up with another method, a reverse lottery: you go to the convenience store, and stick your hand in a machine that most likely will give you two dollars, but there's a one in 100,000 chance it will electrocute you to death on the spot.

      We'd soon have a pile of dead stupid people, all for only $200,000 each!

  23. Re:Better not use a compass to orientate the lande by Mr+Teddy+Bear · · Score: 1

    Mars... needs... women....

    'nuff said.

  24. Hello brainiac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those viruses/bacteria infected humans no matter where they were from, THAT is why they infected the natives. It is very unlikely that Martian life would be even remotely similar to our own, certainly not compatible to our type of life. Hell, they (if 'they' exist, which is unlikely) could easily be non-carbon based or far more advanced than us and immune to viral threats.

  25. AMSAT going to mars?! by dacarr · · Score: 1
    Wow, that's one hell of a DX contact.

    73 DE KE6ISF

    --
    This sig no verb.
  26. Calling Mars... by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny

    "CQ Mars...CQ Mars..."
    "Mars is on the other side of the Sun, wait a few months"
    "I'm working the bounce off Saturn."
    "Oh. Any luck?"
    "Won't know until morning. Light speed delay."

  27. You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they still have functional OSCARs orbiting, and they have transponders on the some of the same frequencies...

    They've already got a beowulf cluster of these... ;)

  28. HEY TARDBOY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    how the fuck did you get so damn stupid u fucking retard? how's about u come over here so i can kick your ass u piece of shit! suck my fat cock u gay queerboy!

  29. Re:What's Next-ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A dnierf my of deyrt that in I!2 Ti korw better neth be4

    be happpy I

  30. Re:Contamination? Howabout colonization? by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Um, the evaporation of the martian oceans? The elimination of almost all weather conducive to water based lifeforms be they carbon or otherwise?

  31. Join AMSAT or send a donation by ikluft · · Score: 1
    Join AMSAT, the non-profit Amateur Radio Satellite Corporation. In North America, go to AMSAT-NA's membership page. In the US, donations are tax-deductible.

    There are also other national AMSAT organizations in countries around the world.

    Ian Kluft KO6YQ
    San Jose, California
  32. challenge beyond Moonbounce, research opportunity by ikluft · · Score: 1

    Who would use it? Amateur Radio operators have been doing satellite and "moonbounce" (using the Moon as a communications satellite by bouncing radio signals off it) communications for decades. It would be a whole new technical challenge to make contact via a satellite in Mars orbit. Not to mention the accomplishment of just getting a non-government spacecraft to Mars. The Physics to do this are well-known.

    They'll undoubtedly also get some funding from universities who would like to put research payloads on the spacecraft. For example, AMSAT's P3D/AO-40 satellite carried a research payload from NASA (to map GPS reception from above the GPS satellites.) since it was going into a highly-elliptical "Molniya" orbit that NASA didn't have any birds in.

  33. Exactly. by Morky · · Score: 1

    The ham radio community should be pissed off about this use of funds. NASA needs fields of giant antennas to make out a signal from Mars. How is a ham radio operator going to see any benfit from this? Your suggestions would be much more practcal.

    1. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest that you read the referenced pdf document, which explains the radio link budget and the antennas required for certain frequencies and bitrates.

  34. misfiring 400n engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well their engine might work ok for mars if they remember to remove the damn vent caps for the propellent mixing valves the next time....duh......

    1. Re:misfiring 400n engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, this is what happened. It had a sticker on it saying "remove before flight", and someone peeled off the sticker. That's what I heard (from a reliable source).

      I don't think it's a good thing to keep this quiet, since the engine worked just fine, and it does not deserve this incident on it's failure list.

  35. Circle around the pole by BlowCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have you considered the fact that "the roving prison" doesn't have to be on the equator? You should be ashamed :-)

    1. Re:Circle around the pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, NeRDfacE@!!!!!!

    2. Re:Circle around the pole by dylan_- · · Score: 2

      Have you considered the fact that "the roving prison" doesn't have to be on the equator? You should be ashamed :-)

      Won't work. Think how to stay out of sunlight on the earth for three years....would staying at the North/South Pole work? Would circling around it work?

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  36. Re:Contamination? Howabout colonization? by BlowCat · · Score: 2
    What if the new habitants adapt to extreme cold, populate the polar areas and lock the vital resources (water, CO2) on the poles, and thus hinder further attempt to redistribute those resources closer to the equator, where the climat is more palatable to humans?

    If you nuke a polar cap with CO2, you could get more CO2 in the air. If you nuke a polar cap covered by lichens, you could end up with carbon dust on the poles and CO in the air.

  37. A COMPARISON OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The White Race: We Sent Satellites to Mars and Invented the Computer
    The Black Race: We Invented Rap Music and Carjacking

    1. Re:A COMPARISON OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      Germans: We Sent Satellites to Mars and Invented the Computer

      Americans: You Invented Rap Music and Carjacking

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:A COMPARISON OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is stupid. Shall we also compare American slavery with German genocide?

    3. Re:A COMPARISON OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      It's less stupid than its parent. Did you write that?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  38. Re:challenge beyond Moonbounce, research opportuni by MsWillow · · Score: 1

    I'm well aware of both satellite and moonbounce. I used to do satellite, and after finding out that moonbounce took major power and a huge aluminum farm, to do CW at a pre-established time and frequency with somebody you knew ... well, to me it was mainly an exercise in futility. Why even try if you already know who you'll talk to, what you'll say and when you'll say it?

    Somehow, talking via a satellite around Mars seems like that, cubed. Count me out. I was into this to learn electronics, and to meet new people, not to prove that I have the most disposable income.

    --

    Lemon curry?
  39. Finally win the ARRL cup for QSO with mars? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that the award cup on display
    at ARRL HQ for the first QSO with mars will
    finally be awarded to someone?

  40. Re:challenge beyond Moonbounce, research opportuni by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

    If indeed AMSAT does this, who will be the winner
    of the Mars Cup [acutally, it is the Elser-Mathes
    Cup]?

    Actually heats up the race!

  41. Re:Better not use a compass to orient[] the lander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mars... needs... women...

    Pump up the volume!

  42. Computers invented to decode the Enigma code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A british postal engineer first suggested the use of electronic machines(until then, mechanical systems where used) to decrypt the mytical German Enigma code.

    1. Re:Computers invented to decode the Enigma code by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck