Atomic Scale Memory
maddugan writes "Technology Research News is reporting that researchers from the University of Wisconsin at Madison have put the theoretical to the test by using single silicon atoms to represent the 1s and 0s of computing. This is equivalent to storing the contents of 7,800 DVDs in one square inch of material."
A better prediction would be that there will soon be 20 posts about how this new technology will allow folks to enlarge their pr0n collections by a factor of 10,000. I'll bet they're rolling in even as I type.
Steve
Also, you could store the contents of:
149 200GB Fluid Bearing WD HDDs
45850 CDs
116400 256MB Flash Memory Cards
298000 Zip Disks
931300 32MB Memory Sticks
OR!!! 20696000 1.44MB Floppies
No offence guys, but come on. Post meaningful figures.
Its actually 250 trillion bits per square inch.
28.42 TB per square inch.
Now thats impressive.
**AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
First off, if this is widely used, won't this
be expensive?
A small fraction of a cents in gold per 1000 terabytes. Your computer already has much more gold in it than one of these would require.
I realize that these are gold MOLECULES,
Gold ATOMS.
Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
Parkinson's Law of Data: Data expands to fill the space available for storage
Asimov's corollary to Parkinson's Law of data: Backlog expands to overfill planned extensions.
I'm sure we'll find a way to use it...
Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
Atomic scale \b{is} essentially a vacuum. It's the same size as or smaller than any potential nasty air molecules!
General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
This isn't actually very useful : what we want is atomic scale logic gates, not data storage.
This reminds me a bit of what they said to one of my ancestors, when he invented the wheel: "what good is that? What we REALLY need is something to fly, this 'riding' thing is just too slow and way too bumpy. Besides, where do you want to go anyway?"
It's this kind of mindless (an really cheap) new-idea-bashing that really irritates me...