jhonny writes "Sony announced a new DRM technology called OpenMG X. Basically it keeps track on how many times you played/viewed (or tried to copy) your product and sends these statistics to the copyright holder."
It seems like the latest trend is to prefix Open on anything that's proprietary and evil to try and trick "Open Source" hackers into thinking it's not so bad.
-- A musician without the RIAA, is like a fish without a bicycle.
And how long will it be before blocking their DRM management server in your personal firewall is considered circumventing the DMCA?
Re:HERE is a good use for a firewall.
by
guacamolefoo
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
My thoughts exactly. The only problem is, what if Sony
requires
the product to be able to communicate with the "server module" at some point in the future? Basically, I fear a movement towards disabling hardware if reporting does not take place. This may be a first step in that direction.
You might think that Hitler, who got elected with the financial support of big business (while in the US, Henry Ford was a major fan too), wouldn't have resorted to intellectual property to meet his need to acquire vast wealth. Not only did he earn millions in royalties from Mein Kampf, but he got a share in the proceeds from sales of photos of him by his official photographer, on whose behalf he extended the copyright law, showing that there's more than one mousey little guy with an appreciation of the value of his image!
Perhaps if Sony technology had been in place, he would have gained enough through IP control to have been satiated, and not forced take extreme measures to try to make the world a better place through his policy of regime change in neighboring lands. ___
-- "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
Magic Gate by Sony
by
dfenstrate
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Does anyone how successful Sony's MagicGate technology has been?
Is anyone actually buying it? Has it been defeated yet? Though that might require substantial modification to the hardware involved....
-- Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
Sure you can. You have both keys.
by
nyet
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Cryptography is not designed for this sort of thing.
It is designed to let two trusted parties communicate w/o a third either snarfing data or pretending to be one of the trusted parties.
The problem is, both ends are not trusted in ANY DRM scheme, which is what makes DRM a pipe dream.
Slashdot Mirror
It seems like the latest trend is to prefix Open on anything that's proprietary and evil to try and trick "Open Source" hackers into thinking it's not so bad.
A musician without the RIAA, is like a fish without a bicycle.
And how long will it be before blocking their DRM management server in your personal firewall is considered circumventing the DMCA?
- requires
the product to be able to communicate with the "server module" at some point in the future? Basically, I fear a movement towards disabling hardware if reporting does not take place. This may be a first step in that direction.Lots of petrified grits
Comment removed based on user account deletion
You might think that Hitler, who got elected with the financial support of big business (while in the US, Henry Ford was a major fan too), wouldn't have resorted to intellectual property to meet his need to acquire vast wealth. Not only did he earn millions in royalties from Mein Kampf, but he got a share in the proceeds from sales of photos of him by his official photographer, on whose behalf he extended the copyright law, showing that there's more than one mousey little guy with an appreciation of the value of his image!
Perhaps if Sony technology had been in place, he would have gained enough through IP control to have been satiated, and not forced take extreme measures to try to make the world a better place through his policy of regime change in neighboring lands.
___
"with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
Is anyone actually buying it? Has it been defeated yet? Though that might require substantial modification to the hardware involved....
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
Cryptography is not designed for this sort of thing.
It is designed to let two trusted parties communicate w/o a third either snarfing data or pretending to be one of the trusted parties.
The problem is, both ends are not trusted in ANY DRM scheme, which is what makes DRM a pipe dream.