Slashdot Mirror


Feds Open 'Total' Tech Spy System

Diesel Dave writes "A Wired article reports: 'On Wednesday, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) will begin awarding contracts for the design and implementation of a Total Information Awareness (TIA) system...The Total Information Awareness program, with its ability to provide persistent storage of everything from credit card, to employment, to medical, to ISP records, is a recipe for civil liberties disaster unless there are provisions for citizens to find out who is looking at their records and to see and correct those records.' The foundation for the omnipotent National ID database has now been laid."

3 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. BAA 02-08 by xyzzy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before the *DIS*information starts flying fast and furious (doh, wait, it already has!) I recommend everyone read BAA 02-08, the request for proposals for technology that will be transitioned into the TIA system. Here is the link:

    http://www.darpa.mil/iao/BAA02-08.pdf

    This BAA describes exactly what RESEARCH DARPA is looking to fund (emphasis on research: DARPA is NOT a procurement agency, and DARPA is NOT an operational agency). They are not buying off-the-shelf systems, and they are not setting up systems to spy on people. There is even a component to this BAA regarding privacy-protecting technologies.

    It is worth noting that many of the problems for which this BAA is looking for national-security-style solutions are problems common to many organizations, as well as fundamental computer-science questions. Not the malevolent stuff that Wired and others would have you think.

  2. Re:Hey Asshole.. by 3waygeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    How does being an aethist make you unAmerican? I'd LOVE to hear your thoughts on this.

    Read George H.W. Bush's thoughts; that's probably what the grandparent post was referring to.

  3. Re:Your Historical Myopia Is Showing by Dr.+Smoe · · Score: 4, Informative


    > Atheism has no more substantial foundataion for ethics than simple personal preference.

    This is, of course, nonsense, as it assumes that the only possible source for moral or ethical
    values is the belief in a deity or deities.